EUS-guided fine needle injection is superior to direct endoscopic injection of 2-octyl cyanoacrylate for the treatment of gastric variceal bleeding

被引:73
作者
Bick, Benjamin L. [1 ]
Al-Haddad, Mohammad [1 ]
Liangpunsakul, Suthat [1 ]
Ghabril, Marwan S. [1 ]
DeWitt, John M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Indianapolis, IN 46204 USA
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2019年 / 33卷 / 06期
关键词
Endoscopic ultrasound; Gastric varices; Cyanoacrylate; Fine needle injection; Variceal bleeding; SPLENIC VEIN-THROMBOSIS; TERM FOLLOW-UP; FUNDAL VARICES; N-BUTYL-2-CYANOACRYLATE INJECTION; HISTOACRYL INJECTION; COIL EMBOLIZATION; THERAPY; GLUE; CLASSIFICATION; HEMORRHAGE;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-018-6462-z
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundEndoscopic injection of cyanoacrylate into gastric varices may be performed by EUS-guided fine needle injection (EUS-FNI) or direct endoscopic injection (DEI). The aim of this study is to compare the rate of recurrent GV bleeding and adverse events between DEI and EUS-FNI for treatment of GV.MethodsIn a single-center study, a retrospective cohort of patients with actively/recently bleeding or high-risk GV treated with DEI were compared with a prospective cohort of similar patients treated with EUS-FNI. Repeat endoscopy after index treatment was performed 3months later or earlier if rebleeding occurred. The main outcomes assessed were rates of GV or overall rebleeding and adverse events.ResultsForty patients (mean age 57.29.1years, 73% male) and 64 patients (mean age 58.0 +/- 12.5years, 52% male) underwent DEI and EUS-FNI, respectively. Compared to the DEI group, the frequency of isolated gastric varices type 1 (IGV1) were higher (p<0.001) but MELD scores were lower (p=0.004) in the EUS-FNI group. At index endoscopy, EUS-FNI utilized a lower mean volume of cyanoacrylate (2.0 +/- 0.8mL vs. 3.3 +/- 1.3mL; p<0.001) and injected a greater number of varices (1.6 +/- 0.7 vs. 1.1 +/- 0.4; p<0.001) compared to DEI. Overall, GV rebleeding [5/57 (8.8%) vs. 9/38 (23.7%); p=0.045] and non-GV-related gastrointestinal bleeding [7/64 (10.9%) vs. 11/40 (27.5%); p=0.030] were less frequent in the EUS-FNI group compared to the DEI group, respectively. Adverse event rates were similar (20.3% vs. 17.5%, p=0.723).ConclusionsEUS-guided CYA injection of active or recently bleeding GV in patients with portal hypertension appears to decrease the rate of GV rebleeding despite injection of more varices and less CYA volume during the initial endoscopic procedure. Adverse events are similar between the two groups. EUS-FNI appears to be the preferred strategy for treatment of these patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1837 / 1845
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [21] EUS-guided injection of cyanoacrylate in perforating feeding veins in gastric varices: results in 5 cases
    Romero-Castro, Rafael
    Pellicer-Bautista, Francisco J.
    Jimenez-Saenz, Manuel
    Marcos-Sanchez, Francisco
    Caunedo-Alvarez, Angel
    Ortiz-Moyano, Carlos
    Gomez-Parra, Manuel
    Herrerias-Gutierrez, Juan M.
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2007, 66 (02) : 402 - 407
  • [22] EUS-guided coil versus cyanoacrylate therapy for the treatment of gastric varices: a multicenter study (with videos)
    Romero-Castro, Rafael
    Ellrichmann, Mark
    Ortiz-Moyano, Carlos
    Carlos Subtil-Inigo, Jose
    Junquera-Florez, Felix
    Gornals, Joan B.
    Repiso-Ortega, Alejandro
    Vila-Costas, Juan
    Marcos-Sanchez, Francisco
    Munoz-Navas, Miguel
    Romero-Gomez, Manuel
    Brullet-Benedi, Enric
    Romero-Vazquez, Javier
    Caunedo-Alvarez, Angel
    Pellicer-Bautista, Francisco
    Herrerias-Gutierrez, Juan M.
    Fritscher-Ravens, Annette
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2013, 78 (05) : 711 - 721
  • [23] Fatal multiple systemic embolisms after injection of cyanoacrylate in bleeding gastric varices of a patient who was noncirrhotic but with idiopathic portal hypertension
    Saracco, Giorgio
    Giordanino, Chiara
    Roberto, Navone
    Ezio, David
    Luca, Todros
    Caronna, Stefania
    Carucci, Patrizia
    Venon, Wilma De Bernardi
    Barletti, Claudio
    Bruno, Mauro
    De Angelis, Claudio
    Musso, Alessandro
    Repici, Alessandro
    Suriani, Renzo
    Rizzetto, Mario
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2007, 65 (02) : 345 - 347
  • [24] SARIN SK, 1989, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V84, P1244
  • [25] PREVALENCE, CLASSIFICATION AND NATURAL-HISTORY OF GASTRIC VARICES - A LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP-STUDY IN 568 PORTAL-HYPERTENSION PATIENTS
    SARIN, SK
    LAHOTI, D
    SAXENA, SP
    MURTHY, NS
    MAKWANA, UK
    [J]. HEPATOLOGY, 1992, 16 (06) : 1343 - 1349
  • [26] Long-term follow-up of gastric variceal sclerotherapy: An eleven-year experience
    Sarin, SK
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1997, 46 (01) : 8 - 14
  • [27] A standardized injection technique and regimen ensures success and safety of N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate injection for the treatment of gastric fundal varices (with videos)
    Seewald, Stefan
    Ang, Tiing Leong
    Imazu, Hiroo
    Naga, Mazen
    Omar, Salern
    Groth, Stefan
    Seitz, Uwe
    Zhong, Yan
    Thonke, Frank
    Soehendra, Nib
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2008, 68 (03) : 447 - 454
  • [28] Shah VH, 2016, SLEISENGER FORDTRANS, P1524
  • [29] A case of portal and splenic vein thrombosis after histoacryl injection therapy in gastric varices
    Shim, CS
    Cho, YD
    Kim, JO
    Bong, HK
    Kim, YS
    Lee, JS
    Lee, MS
    Hwang, SG
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 1996, 28 (05) : 461 - 461
  • [30] ENDOSCOPIC OBLITERATION OF LARGE ESOPHAGOGASTRIC VARICES WITH BUCRYLATE
    SOEHENDRA, N
    NAM, VC
    GRIMM, H
    KEMPENEERS, I
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 1986, 18 (01) : 25 - 26