Sitting Pressure in the Tilted Position Manual Tilt-in-Space Wheelchair vs. Manual Wheelchair with a New Rear Antitip Device

被引:6
作者
MacDonald, Blair [2 ]
Kirby, R. Lee [1 ,2 ]
Smith, Cher [3 ]
MacLeod, Donald A. [4 ]
Webber, Adam
机构
[1] Dalhousie Univ, Nova Scotia Rehabil Ctr Site, Queen Elizabeth II Hlth Sci Ctr, Halifax, NS B3H 4K4, Canada
[2] Dalhousie Univ, Div Phys Med & Rehabil, Dept Med, Halifax, NS B3H 4K4, Canada
[3] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Occupat Therapy, Halifax, NS B3H 4K4, Canada
[4] Dalhousie Univ, Clin Locomotor Funct Lab, Halifax, NS B3H 4K4, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Rehabilitation; Wheelchairs; Pressure Ulcers; Measurement; INTERFACE PRESSURE; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; SEAT-INTERFACE; EFFICACY; POSTURE;
D O I
10.1097/PHM.0b013e31818dff2a
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
To test the hypothesis that, in comparison with a heavier, larger and more expensive manual tilt-in-space wheelchair, a lightweight manual wheelchair equipped with new rear antitip devices provides comparable mean sifting pressures in the tilted position, each of eight able-bodied participants sat for 8 mins in each wheelchair, upright, and tilted back (38-39 degrees). The mean (+/-SD) sitting pressures (of all active sensors in a force-sensing array) at the eighth minute in the upright and tilted positions with the new rear antitip device wheelchair were 58.6 (+/-14.0) and 45.8 (+/-9.3) mm Hg (a 20.7% reduction) (P = 0.005). For the tilt-in-space wheelchair, the mean values were 55.7 (+/-13.9) and 47.2 (+/-10.8) mm Hg (a 26.3% reduction) (P = 0.008). There were no significant differences between the wheelchairs in the upright (P = 0.843) or tilted (P = 0.624) positions. A lightweight manual wheelchair equipped with a new rear antitip device provides equivalent reductions of sitting pressures in the tilted position to a comparably tilted tilt-in-space wheelchair.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 65
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Seating pressures with conventional and dynamic wheelchair cushions in tetraplegia
    Burns, SP
    Betz, KL
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1999, 80 (05): : 566 - 571
  • [2] Impact of sitting time on seat-interface pressure and on pressure mapping with multiple sclerosis patients
    Crawford, SA
    Stinson, MD
    Walsh, DM
    Porter-Armstrong, AP
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2005, 86 (06): : 1221 - 1225
  • [3] DING D, 2007, C P IEEE ENG MED BIO, P4364
  • [4] The role of wheelchair seating standards in determining clinical practices and funding policy
    Ferguson-Pell, M
    Nicholson, G
    Bain, D
    Call, E
    Grady, J
    deVries, J
    [J]. ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 17 (01) : 1 - 6
  • [5] HENDERSON JL, 1994, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V75, P535
  • [6] COMPARATIVE EFFECTS OF POSTURE ON PRESSURE AND SHEAR AT THE BODY-SEAT INTERFACE
    HOBSON, DA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 1992, 29 (04): : 21 - 31
  • [7] Comparison between a tilt-in-space wheelchair and a manual wheelchair equipped with a new rear anti-tip device from the perspective of the caregiver
    Kirby, R. Lee
    MacDonald, Blair
    Smith, Cher
    MacLeod, Donald A.
    Webber, Adam
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2008, 89 (09): : 1811 - 1815
  • [8] Comparing performance of manual wheelchair skills using new and conventional rear anti-tip devices: Randomized controlled trial
    Kirby, R. Lee
    Corkum, Casey G.
    Smith, Cher
    Rushton, Paula
    MacLeod, Donald A.
    Webber, Adam
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2008, 89 (03): : 480 - 485
  • [9] New wheelie aid for wheelchairs: Controlled trial of safety and efficacy
    Kirby, RL
    Lugar, JA
    Breckenridge, C
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2001, 82 (03): : 380 - 390
  • [10] KIRBY RL, 2003, Patent No. 6530598