Significance of sperm characteristics in the evaluation of male infertility

被引:224
作者
Nallella, KP
Sharma, RK
Aziz, N
Agarwal, A
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Glickman Urol Inst, Ctr Adv Res Human Reprod Infertil & Sexual Funct, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[2] Liverpool Womens Hosp, Reprod Med Unit, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
关键词
spermatozoa; male factor inferfility; sperm parameters; sperm characteristics; infertility evaluation;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.08.024
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare sperm characteristics among: patients undergoing infertility evaluation, patients with male factor infertility (MFI), healthy sperm donors, and men with proven fertility to examine the overlap of sperm characteristics in all four of these groups; and to identify good discriminators of fertility versus infertility among sperm characteristics. Design: Retrospective study. Setting: Male infertility clinic at a tertiary care hospital. Patient(s): Proven fertile men (n = 56), normal donors (n = 91), men presenting for infertility evaluation (n = 406), and MFI patients (n = 166). Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): Routine semen analysis. Result(s): Using current World Health Organization (WHO) reference values, a large group of MFI patients presented with higher sperm concentration (27.5 X 10(6) to 99.2 X 10(6)), resulting in broader overlap with fertile men and poor sensitivity (0.48). Similarly, percentage normal morphology (%) using Tygerberg's strict criteria was low in most of the MFI patients (sensitivity 0.83), almost half of the fertile men also presented with abnormal morphology (specificity 0.51). Of all the variables examined, sperm motility (%) was superior, having minimum overlap range (lower and upper cut-off values 46% and 75%) and high sensitivity (0.74) and specificity (0.90). Areas under curve were higher for, motility (0.90) and concentration (0,84) compared with morphology, (WHO 0.65 and Tygerberg's strict criteria 0.74). Conclusion(s): Sperm, motility and concentration provide more accurate information than morphology (WHO and Tygerberg's criteria) during infertility evaluation. Redefining the reference values for concentration and morphology may significantly increase the importance of routine semen analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:629 / 634
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [11] COMPUTER-ASSISTED SEMEN ANALYSIS SYSTEMS - SPERM MOTILITY ASSESSMENT
    IRVINE, DS
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1995, 10 : 53 - 59
  • [12] Kolettis PN, 2003, AM FAM PHYSICIAN, V67, P2165
  • [13] Krause W, 1995, INT J ANDROL, V18, P32
  • [14] NEW METHOD OF EVALUATING SPERM MORPHOLOGY WITH PREDICTIVE VALUE FOR HUMAN INVITRO FERTILIZATION
    KRUGER, TF
    ACOSTA, AA
    SIMMONS, KF
    SWANSON, RJ
    MATTA, JF
    VEECK, LL
    MORSHEDI, M
    BRUGO, S
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1987, 30 (03) : 248 - 251
  • [15] MACLEOD J, 1953, FERTIL STERIL, V4, P10
  • [16] Male Infertility Best Practice Policy Committee of the American Urological Association, 2004, Fertil Steril, V82 Suppl 1, pS123
  • [17] MCCONNELL JD, 1997, INFERTILITY MALE, P249
  • [18] Semen parameters, including WHO and strict criteria morphology, in a fertile and subfertile population: an effort towards standardization of in-vivo thresholds
    Menkveld, R
    Wong, WY
    Lombard, CJ
    Wetzels, AMM
    Thomas, CMG
    Merkus, HMWM
    Steegers-Theunissen, RPM
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2001, 16 (06) : 1165 - 1171
  • [19] Moldenhauer JS, 2003, J ANDROL, V24, P783
  • [20] ACTIVATION OF MOTILITY IN QUIESCENT HAMSTER SPERM FROM EPIDIDYMIS BY CALCIUM AND CYCLIC NUCLEOTIDES
    MORTON, B
    HARRIGAN.J
    ALBAGLI, L
    JOOSS, T
    [J]. BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 1974, 56 (02) : 372 - 379