Significance of sperm characteristics in the evaluation of male infertility

被引:224
作者
Nallella, KP
Sharma, RK
Aziz, N
Agarwal, A
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Glickman Urol Inst, Ctr Adv Res Human Reprod Infertil & Sexual Funct, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[2] Liverpool Womens Hosp, Reprod Med Unit, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
关键词
spermatozoa; male factor inferfility; sperm parameters; sperm characteristics; infertility evaluation;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.08.024
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare sperm characteristics among: patients undergoing infertility evaluation, patients with male factor infertility (MFI), healthy sperm donors, and men with proven fertility to examine the overlap of sperm characteristics in all four of these groups; and to identify good discriminators of fertility versus infertility among sperm characteristics. Design: Retrospective study. Setting: Male infertility clinic at a tertiary care hospital. Patient(s): Proven fertile men (n = 56), normal donors (n = 91), men presenting for infertility evaluation (n = 406), and MFI patients (n = 166). Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): Routine semen analysis. Result(s): Using current World Health Organization (WHO) reference values, a large group of MFI patients presented with higher sperm concentration (27.5 X 10(6) to 99.2 X 10(6)), resulting in broader overlap with fertile men and poor sensitivity (0.48). Similarly, percentage normal morphology (%) using Tygerberg's strict criteria was low in most of the MFI patients (sensitivity 0.83), almost half of the fertile men also presented with abnormal morphology (specificity 0.51). Of all the variables examined, sperm motility (%) was superior, having minimum overlap range (lower and upper cut-off values 46% and 75%) and high sensitivity (0.74) and specificity (0.90). Areas under curve were higher for, motility (0.90) and concentration (0,84) compared with morphology, (WHO 0.65 and Tygerberg's strict criteria 0.74). Conclusion(s): Sperm, motility and concentration provide more accurate information than morphology (WHO and Tygerberg's criteria) during infertility evaluation. Redefining the reference values for concentration and morphology may significantly increase the importance of routine semen analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:629 / 634
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Agarwal A, 2003, J ANDROL, V24, P343
  • [2] ESTIMATING FERTILITY POTENTIAL VIA SEMEN ANALYSIS DATA
    BARTOOV, B
    ELTES, F
    PANSKY, M
    LEDERMAN, H
    CASPI, E
    SOFFER, Y
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1993, 8 (01) : 65 - 70
  • [3] Bedaiwy MA, 2003, J ANDROL, V24, P353
  • [4] Relation between semen quality and fertility:: a population-based study of 430 first-pregnancy planners
    Bonde, JPE
    Ernst, E
    Jensen, TK
    Hjollund, NHI
    Kolstad, H
    Henriksen, TB
    Scheike, T
    Giwercman, A
    Olsen, J
    Skakkebæk, NE
    [J]. LANCET, 1998, 352 (9135) : 1172 - 1177
  • [5] Advanced semen analysis: a simple screening test to predict intrauterine insemination success
    Branigan, EF
    Estes, MA
    Muller, CH
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1999, 71 (03) : 547 - 551
  • [6] What constitutes a normal seminal analysis? Semen parameters of 243 fertile men
    Chia, SE
    Tay, SK
    Lim, ST
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1998, 13 (12) : 3394 - 3398
  • [7] Predictive value of normal sperm morphology: a structured literature review
    Coetzee, K
    Kruge, TF
    Lombard, CJ
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 1998, 4 (01) : 73 - 82
  • [8] REASSESSMENT OF THE ACCURACY OF TRADITIONAL SPERM CHARACTERISTICS AND ADENOSINE-TRIPHOSPHATE (ATP) IN ESTIMATING THE FERTILIZING POTENTIAL OF HUMAN-SEMEN INVIVO
    COMHAIRE, FH
    VERMEULEN, L
    SCHOONJANS, F
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 1987, 10 (05): : 653 - 662
  • [9] COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER 2 OR MORE CORRELATED RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES - A NONPARAMETRIC APPROACH
    DELONG, ER
    DELONG, DM
    CLARKEPEARSON, DI
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (03) : 837 - 845
  • [10] Sperm morphology, motility, and concentration in fertile and infertile men.
    Guzick, DS
    Overstreet, JW
    Factor-Litvak, P
    Brazil, CK
    Nakajima, ST
    Coutifaris, C
    Carson, SA
    Cisneros, P
    Steinkampf, MP
    Hill, JA
    Xu, D
    Vogel, DL
    Natl Cooperative Reprod Med Network
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 345 (19) : 1388 - 1393