Experimenting with a democratic ideal: Deliberative Polling and public opinion

被引:296
作者
Fishkin, JS [1 ]
Luskin, RC
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Commun, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Univ Texas, Dept Govt, Austin, TX 78712 USA
关键词
Deliberative Polling; deliberative democracy; political equality; informed; opinion;
D O I
10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500121
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
The values of deliberation and political equality have proven hard to achieve simultaneously. Deliberative Polling, which embodies both, provides a useful window on deliberative democracy. The results, responding to 'defeatist,' 'extenuationist,' and 'alarmist' critiques, show that ordinary people can deliberate, that they benefit from doing so, and that the process neither biases nor polarizes their opinions.
引用
收藏
页码:284 / 298
页数:15
相关论文
共 39 条
[21]  
LUSKIN R, 1999, ANN M AM POL SCI ASS
[22]  
Luskin R, 2000, ANN M AM POL SCI ASS
[23]  
Luskin R. C., 2002, THINKING POLITICAL P
[24]   Considered opinions: Deliberative polling in Britain [J].
Luskin, RC ;
Fishkin, JS ;
Jowell, R .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2002, 32 :455-487
[25]   MEASURING POLITICAL SOPHISTICATION [J].
LUSKIN, RC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 1987, 31 (04) :856-899
[26]  
Luskin RC., 2003, ELECTORAL DEMOCRACY
[27]  
Luskin Robert C, 2004, CONSIDERED OPINIONS
[28]  
Mackie Gerry., 2003, Democracy Defended
[29]  
Mccombs Maxwell., 1999, POLL HUMAN FACE NATL
[30]   Facilitating communication across lines of political difference: The role of mass media [J].
Mutz, DC ;
Martin, PS .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2001, 95 (01) :97-114