The Practice of Pre-Marketing Safety Assessment in Drug Development

被引:12
作者
Chuang-Stein, Christy [1 ]
Xia, H. Amy [2 ]
机构
[1] Pfizer Inc, Stat Res & Consulting Ctr, Kalamazoo, MI USA
[2] Amgen Inc, Global Biostat Sci, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320 USA
关键词
Designated medical events; Graphical display of safety data; Multiplicity adjustment; Program safety analysis plan; Targeted medical event; Three-tier approach; FALSE DISCOVERY RATE; BENEFIT;
D O I
10.1080/10543406.2013.736805
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
The last 15 years have seen a substantial increase in efforts devoted to safety assessment by statisticians in the pharmaceutical industry. While some of these efforts were driven by regulations and public demand for safer products, much of the motivation came from the realization that there is a strong need for a systematic approach to safety planning, evaluation, and reporting at the program level throughout the drug development life cycle. An efficient process can help us identify safety signals early and afford us the opportunity to develop effective risk minimization plan early in the development cycle. This awareness has led many pharmaceutical sponsors to set up internal systems and structures to effectively conduct safety assessment at all levels (patient, study, and program). In addition to process, tools have emerged that are designed to enhance data review and pattern recognition. In this paper, we describe advancements in the practice of safety assessment during the premarketing phase of drug development. In particular, we share examples of safety assessment practice at our respective companies, some of which are based on recommendations from industry-initiated working groups on best practice in recent years.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 25
页数:23
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Graphical approaches to the analysis of safety data from clinical trials [J].
Amit, Ohad ;
Heiberger, Richard M. ;
Lane, Peter W. .
PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2008, 7 (01) :20-35
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Guidance for industry drug-induced liver injury: premarketing clinical evaluation
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1998, ICH HARM TRIP GUID S
[4]   CONTROLLING THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE - A PRACTICAL AND POWERFUL APPROACH TO MULTIPLE TESTING [J].
BENJAMINI, Y ;
HOCHBERG, Y .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 1995, 57 (01) :289-300
[5]  
Berry SM, 2010, CH CRC BIOSTAT SER, P1, DOI 10.1201/EBK1439825488
[6]   Accounting for multiplicities in assessing drug safety: A three-level hierarchical mixture model [J].
Berry, SM ;
Berry, DA .
BIOMETRICS, 2004, 60 (02) :418-426
[7]  
Chuang-Stein C, 2001, DRUG INF J, V35, P377, DOI 10.1177/009286150103500207
[8]  
Chuang-Stein C., 1993, DRUG SAFETY ASSESSME
[9]  
Chuang-Stein C, 2008, DRUG INF J, V42, P223, DOI 10.1177/009286150804200304
[10]   A NEW PROPOSAL FOR BENEFIT-LESS-RISK ANALYSIS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
CHUANGSTEIN, C .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1994, 15 (01) :30-43