Peer pressure in an agency relationship

被引:97
作者
Barron, JM [1 ]
Gjerde, KP [1 ]
机构
[1] SUNY STONY BROOK,STONY BROOK,NY 11794
关键词
D O I
10.1086/209832
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We investigate the role of peer pressure in influencing the optimal incentive scheme offered to workers engaged in team production. We develop an agency model of peer policing to identify factors that affect the extent of mutual monitoring. As the principal must compensate workers for their monitoring efforts and the costs that peer pressure imposes on workers, introducing peer pressure alters the optimal compensation package. We establish conditions under which the principal reduces the marginal compensation rule to reduce monitoring efforts. As such, peer pressure provides a rationale for a reduced link between compensation and output in a team setting.
引用
收藏
页码:234 / 254
页数:21
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   INFORMATION REVELATION AND PRINCIPAL-AGENT CONTRACTS [J].
ALVI, E .
JOURNAL OF LABOR ECONOMICS, 1988, 6 (01) :132-146
[2]  
Barron JM, 1996, J ECON MANAGE STRAT, V5, P69
[3]   THE EMERGENCE OF NORMS IN COMPETITIVE DECISION-MAKING GROUPS [J].
BETTENHAUSEN, K ;
MURNIGHAN, JK .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1985, 30 (03) :350-372
[4]   THE TEAM BUILDING-TASK PERFORMANCE RELATION - SOME CONCEPTUAL AND METHODOLOGICAL REFINEMENTS [J].
BULLER, PF .
GROUP & ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 1986, 11 (03) :147-168
[5]   THE DEVELOPMENT AND ENFORCEMENT OF GROUP NORMS [J].
FELDMAN, DC .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1984, 9 (01) :47-53
[6]   THE PRESENCE OF MORAL HAZARD IN BUDGET BREAKING [J].
GAYNOR, M .
PUBLIC CHOICE, 1989, 61 (03) :261-267
[7]   PIECE-RATE INCENTIVE SCHEMES [J].
GIBBONS, R .
JOURNAL OF LABOR ECONOMICS, 1987, 5 (04) :413-429
[8]   INCENTIVES IN TEAMS [J].
GROVES, T .
ECONOMETRICA, 1973, 41 (04) :617-631
[9]   MORAL HAZARD IN TEAMS [J].
HOLMSTROM, B .
BELL JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1982, 13 (02) :324-340
[10]   MULTITASK PRINCIPAL AGENT ANALYSES - INCENTIVE CONTRACTS, ASSET OWNERSHIP, AND JOB DESIGN [J].
HOLMSTROM, B ;
MILGROM, P .
JOURNAL OF LAW ECONOMICS & ORGANIZATION, 1991, 7 :24-52