Reliability of Predictors for Screw Cutout in Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures

被引:135
|
作者
De Bruijn, Kirstin [1 ]
den Hartog, Dennis
Tuinebreijer, Wim
Roukema, Gert
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Rotterdam, Erasmus MC, Dept Surg, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
TIP-APEX DISTANCE; FIXATION; FAILURE; FEMUR; NAIL;
D O I
10.2106/JBJS.K.00357
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Following internal fixation of intertrochanteric hip fractures, tip apex distance, fracture classification, position of the screw in the femoral head, and fracture reduction are known predictors for screw cutout, but the reliability of these measurements is unknown. We investigated the reliability of the tip apex distance measurement, the Cleveland femoral head dividing system, the three-grade classification system of Baumgaertner for fracture reduction, and the AO classification system as predictors for screw cutout. Methods: All patients with an intertrochanteric hip fracture who were managed with either a dynamic hip screw or a gamma nail between January 2007 and June 2010 were evaluated from our hip trauma database. Results: The tip apex distance measurement was reliable and patients with device cutout had a significantly higher tip apex distance. The agreement between observers with regard to screw position and fracture reduction was moderately reliable. After adjustment for tip apex distance and screw position, A3 fractures were at more risk of cutout compared with A1 fractures. Poor fracture reduction was significantly related with a higher incidence of cutout in univariate analysis, but not in multivariate analysis. Central-inferior and anterior-inferior positions, after adjustment for tip apex distance and screw position, were significantly protective against cutout. Conclusion: To decrease probable risks of cutout, the tip apex distance needs to stay small or the screw needs to be placed central-inferiorly or anterior-inferiorly. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
引用
收藏
页码:1266 / 1272
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Dynamic hip screw versus intramedullary nailing for the treatment of A1 intertrochanteric fractures: A retrospective, comparative study and cost analysis
    Alessio-Mazzola, Mattia
    Traverso, Giacomo
    Coccarello, Francesco
    Sanguineti, Francesca
    Formica, Matteo
    JOINT DISEASES AND RELATED SURGERY, 2022, 33 (02) : 314 - 322
  • [32] Hip Arthroplasty After Surgical Treatment of Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures
    Yuan, Brandon J.
    Abdel, Matthew P.
    Cross, William W.
    Berry, Daniel J.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2017, 32 (11) : 3438 - 3444
  • [33] Intramedullary nailing confers an increased risk of medial migration compared to dynamic hip screw fixation in unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures
    Law, Gin Way
    Wong, Yoke Rung
    Gardner, Antony
    Ng, Yau Hong
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2021, 52 (11): : 3440 - 3445
  • [34] Comparison of Dynamic Hip Screw and Proximal Femoral Nailing Techniques in Stable Intertrochanteric Fractures
    Shiraz, Salman
    Shujauddin, Mohammad
    Hasan, Khalid
    Elramadi, Ahmed
    Ahmed, Ghalib
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (01)
  • [35] Optimizing fixation methods for stable and unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures treated with sliding hip screw or cephalomedullary nailing: A comparative biomechanical and finite element analysis study
    Kyriakopoulos, G.
    Panagopoulos, A.
    Pasiou, E.
    Kourkoulis, S. K.
    Diamantakos, I.
    Anastopoulos, G.
    Tserpes, K.
    Tatani, I.
    Lakoumentas, J.
    Megas, P.
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2022, 53 (12): : 4072 - 4085
  • [36] Risk Factors Associated With Cephalomedullary Nail Cutout in the Treatment of Trochanteric Hip Fractures
    Ciufo, David J.
    Zaruta, Douglas A.
    Lipof, Jason S.
    Judd, Kyle T.
    Gorczyca, John T.
    Ketz, John P.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2017, 31 (11) : 583 - 588
  • [37] Helical Blade Versus Screw Fixation in the Treatment of Hip Fractures With Cephalomedullary Devices: Incidence of Failure and Atypical "Medial Cutout"
    Chapman, Talia
    Zmistowski, Benjamin
    Krieg, James
    Stake, Seth
    Jones, Christopher M.
    Levicoff, Eric
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2018, 32 (08) : 397 - 402
  • [38] Lateral wall thickness is not associated with revision risk of medially stable intertrochanteric fractures fixed with a sliding hip screw
    Chen, B.
    Duckworth, A. D.
    Farrow, L.
    Xu, Y. J.
    Clement, N. D.
    BONE & JOINT OPEN, 2024, 5 (02): : 123 - 131
  • [39] Proximal Femoral Nail vs. Dynamic Hip Screw in Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fractures: A Meta-Analysis
    Zhang, Kairui
    Zhang, Sheng
    Yang, Jun
    Dong, Weiqiang
    Wang, Shengnan
    Cheng, Yirong
    Al-Qwbani, Mohammed
    Wang, Qiang
    Yu, Bin
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2014, 20 : 1628 - 1633
  • [40] Intraoperative lateral wall fractures during Dynamic Hip Screw fixation for intertrochanteric fractures-Incidence, causative factors and clinical outcome
    Pradeep, Annur R.
    KiranKumar, Addala
    Dheenadhayalan, Jayaramaraju
    Rajasekaran, Shanmuganathan
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2018, 49 (02): : 334 - 338