Can we use a lower intravaginal dose of misoprostol in the medical management of miscarriage? A randomised controlled study

被引:15
|
作者
Petersen, Scott G. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Perkins, Anneliese [1 ]
Gibbons, Kristen [2 ]
Bertolone, Julia [1 ]
Devenish-Meares, Paul [1 ]
Cave, Donald [1 ]
Mahomed, Kassam [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, So Med Sch, Mater Mothers Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[2] Mater Med Res Inst, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Toowoomba Base Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Toowoomba, Qld, Australia
[4] Ipswich Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Ipswich, Qld, Australia
关键词
dose; medical management; miscarriage; misoprostol; pregnancy loss; MANUAL VACUUM ASPIRATION; 600; MU-G; EXPECTANT MANAGEMENT; SPONTANEOUS-ABORTION; SURGICAL-MANAGEMENT; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1111/ajo.12009
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background The optimal dose of misoprostol to be used in the medical management of miscarriage before 13weeks has not been resolved. Aim To evaluate the effectiveness and side effect profile of two different dosages of misoprostol. Methods A randomised controlled, equivalence study comparing 400 vs 800g misoprostol per vaginum (PV) on an outpatient basis. The allocated dose was repeated the next day if clinically the products of conception had not been passed. Complete miscarriage was evaluated using two methods: ultrasound criteria on Day 7 and the need for surgical management (clinical criteria). Equivalence was demonstrated if the 95% confidence interval [CI] of the observed risk difference between the two doses for complete miscarriage lay between 15.0 and 15.0%. Differences in side effects and patient satisfaction were evaluated using patient-completed questionnaires. Results One hundred and fifty-eight women were allocated to receive 400g and 152 women to 800g misoprostol for the management of missed (91.3%) or incomplete (8.7%) miscarriage. The rate of induced complete miscarriage was equivalent using both ultrasound criteria (observed risk difference (ORD) 4.6%, 95% CI 12.8 to 3.7%; P=0.313) and clinical criteria (ORD 5.6%, 95% CI 14.8 to 3.6%; P=0.273). Following the 400g dose, the reported rate of fever/rigors was lower (ORD 15.6%, 95% CI 28.1 to 3.0%; P=0.015), and more women reported their decision to undergo medical management as a good decision (ORD 15.2%, 95% CI 2.8 to 27.7%; P=0.018). Conclusion Four hundred-microgram misoprostol PV can be recommended for the medical management of miscarriage on an outpatient basis.
引用
收藏
页码:64 / 73
页数:10
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] Cost-effectiveness of curettage vs. expectant management in women with an incomplete evacuation after misoprostol treatment for first-trimester miscarriage: a randomized controlled trial and cohort study
    Lemmers, Marike
    Verschoor, Marianne A. C.
    Bossuyt, Patrick M.
    Huirne, Judith A. F.
    Spinder, Teake
    Nieboer, Theodoor E.
    Bongers, Marlies Y.
    Janssen, Ineke A. H.
    Van Hooff, Marcel H. A.
    Mol, Ben W. J.
    Ankum, Willem M.
    Bosmans, Judith E.
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2018, 97 (03) : 294 - 300
  • [2] Clinical and psychological impact after surgical, medical or expectant management of first-trimester miscarriage - a randomised controlled trial
    Kong, Grace Wing Shan
    Lok, Ingrid Hung
    Yiu, Alice Ka Wah
    Hui, Annie Shuk Yi
    Lai, Beatrice Pui Yee
    Chung, Tony Kwok Hung
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2013, 53 (02) : 170 - 177
  • [3] Mifepristone and misoprostol versus misoprostol alone for the management of missed miscarriage (MifeMiso): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
    Chu, Justin J.
    Devall, Adam J.
    Beeson, Leanne E.
    Hardy, Pollyanna
    Cheed, Versha
    Sun, Yongzhong
    Roberts, Tracy E.
    Ogwulu, C. Okeke
    Williams, Eleanor
    Jones, Laura L.
    Papadopoulos, Jenny H. La Fontaine
    Bender-Atik, Ruth
    Brewin, Jane
    Hinshaw, Kim
    Choudhary, Meenakshi
    Ahmed, Amna
    Naftalin, Joel
    Nunes, Natalie
    Oliver, Abigail
    Izzat, Feras
    Bhatia, Kalsang
    Hassan, Ismail
    Jeve, Yadava
    Hamilton, Judith
    Deb, Shilpa
    Bottomley, Cecilia
    Ross, Jackie
    Watkins, Linda
    Underwood, Martyn
    Cheong, Ying
    Kumar, Chitra S.
    Gupta, Pratima
    Small, Rachel
    Pringle, Stewart
    Hodge, Frances
    Shahid, Anupama
    Gallos, Ioannis D.
    Horne, Andrew W.
    Quenby, Siobhan
    Coomarasamy, Arri
    LANCET, 2020, 396 (10253) : 770 - 778
  • [4] Expectant versus surgical management of first-trimester miscarriage: a randomised controlled study
    Wael Al-Ma’ani
    Erich-Franz Solomayer
    Mohamad Hammadeh
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2014, 289 : 1011 - 1015
  • [5] Expectant versus surgical management of first-trimester miscarriage: a randomised controlled study
    Al-Ma'ani, Wael
    Solomayer, Erich-Franz
    Hammadeh, Mohamad
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2014, 289 (05) : 1011 - 1015
  • [6] Evaluation of Low-dose and High-dose Intravaginal Misoprostol for Induction of Labour: A Randomised, Double-blinded, Single Centre Study
    Mummalaneni, Gowthami
    Sravanthi, Thodeti Chaitanya
    Sridhar, I
    Sayana, Suresh Babu
    Kumar, Meela Ranjith
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2022, 16 (07) : QC10 - QC14
  • [7] Incidence of pregnancy after expectant, medical, or surgical management of spontaneous first trimester miscarriage: long term follow-up of miscarriage treatment (MIST) randomised controlled trial
    Smith, Lindsay F. P.
    Ewings, Paul D.
    Quinlan, Catherine
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 339 : 910
  • [8] A randomized controlled study comparing 600 versus 1200 μg oral misoprostol for medical management of incomplete abortion
    Ngoc, NTN
    Blum, J
    Durocher, J
    Quan, TTV
    Winikoff, B
    CONTRACEPTION, 2005, 72 (06) : 438 - 442
  • [9] Prospective open-label non-inferiority randomised controlled trial comparing letrozole and mifepristone pretreatment in medical management of first trimester missed miscarriage: study protocol
    Du, Libei
    Li, Raymond Hang Wun
    Gemzell-Danielsson, Kristina
    Du, Yan Hong
    Zhang, Li
    Diao, Wei Yu
    Ho, Pak Chung
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (01):
  • [10] Can easy-to-use software deliver effective e-learning in dental education? A randomised controlled study
    Woelber, J. P.
    Hilbert, T. S.
    Ratka-Krueger, P.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF DENTAL EDUCATION, 2012, 16 (03) : 187 - 192