High-definition vs. standard-definition colonoscopy in the characterization of small colonic polyps: results from a randomized trial

被引:43
作者
Longcroft-Wheaton, G. [1 ]
Brown, J. [2 ]
Cowlishaw, D. [1 ]
Higgins, B. [3 ]
Bhandari, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Queen Alexandra Hosp, Portsmouth PO6 3LY, Hants, England
[2] Univ Portsmouth, Dept Pharm & Biomed Sci, Portsmouth, Hants, England
[3] Univ Portsmouth, Dept Math & Biostat, Portsmouth, Hants, England
关键词
COMPUTED VIRTUAL CHROMOENDOSCOPY; COLORECTAL LESIONS; CLASSIFICATION; SURVEILLANCE;
D O I
10.1055/s-0032-1310004
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and study aims: The resolution of endoscopes has increased in recent years. Modern Fujinon colonoscopes have a charge-coupled device (CCD) pixel density of 650000 pixels compared with the 410000 pixel CCD in standard-definition scopes. Acquiring high-definition scopes represents a significant capital investment and their clinical value remains uncertain. The aim of the current study was to investigate the impact of high-definition endoscopes on the in vivo histology prediction of colonic polyps. Patients and methods: Colonoscopy procedures were performed using Fujinon colonoscopes and EPX-4400 processor. Procedures were randomized to be performed using either a standard-definition EC-530 colonoscope or high-definition EC-530 and EC-590 colonoscopes. Polyps of < 10 mm were assessed using both white light imaging (WLI) and flexible spectral imaging color enhancement (FICE), and the predicted diagnosis was recorded. Polyps were removed and sent for histological analysis by a pathologist who was blinded to the endoscopic diagnosis. The predicted diagnosis was compared with the histology to calculate the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of in vivo assessment using either standard- or high-definition scopes. Results: A total of 293 polyps of < 10mm were examined - 150 polyps using the standard-definition colonoscope and 143 polyps using high-definition colonoscopes. There was no difference in sensitivity, specificity or accuracy between the two scopes when WLI was used (standard vs. high: accuracy 70% [95% CI 62-77] vs. 73% [95% CI 65-80]; P=0.61). When FICE was used, high-definition colonoscopes showed a sensitivity of 93% compared with 83% for standard-definition colonoscopes (P=0.048); specificity was 81% and 82%, respectively. Conclusions: There was no difference between high- and standard-definition colonoscopes when white light was used, but FICE significantly improved the in vivo diagnosis of small polyps when high- definition scopes were used compared with standard definition.
引用
收藏
页码:905 / 910
页数:6
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2003, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V58, P3
[2]   Guidelines for colorectal cancer screening and surveillance in moderate and high risk groups (update from 2002) [J].
Cairns, Stuart R. ;
Scholefield, John H. ;
Steele, Robert J. ;
Dunlop, Malcolm G. ;
Thomas, Huw J. W. ;
Evans, Gareth D. ;
Eaden, Jayne A. ;
Rutter, Matthew D. ;
Atkin, Wendy P. ;
Saunders, Brian P. ;
Lucassen, Anneke ;
Jenkins, Paul ;
Fairclough, Peter D. ;
Woodhouse, Christopher R. J. .
GUT, 2010, 59 (05) :666-689
[3]   ASGE guideline: colorectal cancer screening and surveillance [J].
Davila, RE ;
Rajan, E ;
Baron, TH .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2006, 63 (04) :546-557
[4]  
Gunnam R, 2010, GLOBAL ENDOSCOPES PI
[5]   A Resect and Discard Strategy Would Improve Cost-Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening [J].
Hassan, Cesare ;
Pickhardt, Perry J. ;
Rex, Douglas K. .
CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2010, 8 (10) :865-869
[6]   Optical diagnosis of small colorectal polyps at routine colonoscopy (Detect InSpect ChAracterise Resect and Discard; DISCARD trial): a prospective cohort study [J].
Ignjatovic, Ana ;
East, James E. ;
Suzuki, Noriko ;
Vance, Margaret ;
Guenther, Thomas ;
Saunders, Brian P. .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2009, 10 (12) :1171-1178
[7]   Flexible spectral imaging color enhancement and indigo carmine in neoplasia diagnosis during colonoscopy: a large prospective UK series [J].
Longcroft-Wheaton, Gaius Richard ;
Higgins, Bernard ;
Bhandari, Pradeep .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2011, 23 (10) :903-911
[8]   Computed virtual chromoendoscopy versus standard colonoscopy with targeted indigocarmine chromoscopy: a randomised multicentre trial [J].
Pohl, J. ;
Lotterer, E. ;
Balzer, C. ;
Sackmann, M. ;
Schmidt, K-D ;
Gossner, L. ;
Schaab, C. ;
Frieling, T. ;
Medve, M. ;
Mayer, G. ;
Nguyen-Tat, M. ;
Ell, C. .
GUT, 2009, 58 (01) :73-78
[9]   Computed Virtual Chromoendoscopy for Classification of Small Colorectal Lesions: A Prospective Comparative Study [J].
Pohl, Juergen ;
Nguyen-Tat, Marc ;
Pech, Oliver ;
May, Andrea ;
Rabenstein, Thomas ;
Ell, Christian .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2008, 103 (03) :562-569
[10]   The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy PIVI (Preservation and Incorporation of Valuable Endoscopic Innovations) on real-time endoscopic assessment of the histology of diminutive colorectal polyps [J].
Rex, Douglas K. ;
Kahi, Charles ;
O'Brien, Michael ;
Levin, T. R. ;
Pohl, Heiko ;
Rastogi, Amit ;
Burgart, Larry ;
Imperiale, Tom ;
Ladabaum, Uri ;
Cohen, Jonathan ;
Lieberman, David A. .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2011, 73 (03) :419-422