Diffusion-Tensor MRI at 3 T: Differentiation of Central Gland Prostate Cancer From Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

被引:15
作者
Park, Sung Yoon [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Chan Kyo [1 ,2 ]
Park, Byung Kwan [1 ,2 ]
Ha, Sang Yun [3 ]
Kwon, Ghee Young [3 ]
Kim, Bohyun [4 ]
机构
[1] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Seoul 135710, South Korea
[2] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Samsung Med Ctr, Ctr Imaging Sci, Seoul 135710, South Korea
[3] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, Seoul 135710, South Korea
[4] Mayo Clin, Coll Med, Dept Radiol, Rochester, MN USA
关键词
benign prostate hyperplasia; central gland; diffusion-weighted imaging; MRI; prostate cancer; TRANSITION ZONE; FIBER TRACTOGRAPHY; COEFFICIENT VALUES; PERIPHERAL ZONES; TUMOR TYPE; TISSUE; PREDICTION; CARCINOMA; FEATURES;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.13.11015
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to retrospectively evaluate the utility of diffusion- tensor imaging (DTI) at 3 T in differentiating central gland prostate cancer from benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). MATERIALS AND METHODS. Eighty consecutive patients (57 with central gland cancer and 23 without central gland cancer) were included in this study. All patients underwent T2-weighted imaging and DTI at 3 T, followed by surgery. For predicting central gland cancer, experienced and less-experienced radiologists independently analyzed T2-weighted imaging and combined T2-weighted imaging and DTI, respectively. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and fractional anisotropy (FA) values were measured for central gland cancers and BPH foci of stromal and glandular hyperplasia. Statistical analyses were performed using McNemar test, linear mixed model, receiver operating characteristic (ROC), and kappa statistics. RESULTS. For predicting central gland cancers, the area under the curve (A(z)) of combined T2-weighted imaging and DTI for the experienced (0.915) and less-experienced reader (0.753) was superior to that of T2-weighted imaging (0.723 vs 0.664; p < 0.001). The mean ADC and FA values were 0.77 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s and 0.35, respectively, for central gland cancers, 1.22 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s and 0.26, respectively, for stromal hyperplasia foci, and 1.59 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s and 0.21, respectively, for glandular hyperplasia foci, and the values differed significantly. For differentiating central gland cancer from stromal hyperplasia foci and glandular hyperplasia foci, A z values of ADC versus FA were 0.989 and 1.0 versus 0.818 and 0.916, respectively, and the difference was statistically different. CONCLUSION. DTI at 3 T is useful for distinguishing central gland cancers from BPH foci, with significantly different ADC and FA values. Furthermore, ADC showed greater diagnostic accuracy than FA in differentiating central gland cancers from stromal and glandular hyperplasia foci.
引用
收藏
页码:W254 / W262
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Transition zone prostate cancers: Features, detection, localization, and staging at endorectal MR imaging
    Akin, Oguz
    Sala, Evis
    Moskowitz, Chaya S.
    Kuroiwa, Kentaro
    Ishill, Nicole M.
    Pucar, Darko
    Scardino, Peter T.
    Hricak, Hedvig
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2006, 239 (03) : 784 - 792
  • [2] Evaluation of Diffusion Tensor Imaging and Fiber Tractography of the Median Nerve: Preliminary Results on Intrasubject Variability and Precision of Measurements
    Andreisek, Gustav
    White, Lawrence M.
    Kassner, Andrea
    Sussman, Marshall S.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 194 (01) : W65 - W72
  • [3] ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    Richenberg, Jonathan
    Clements, Richard
    Choyke, Peter
    Verma, Sadhna
    Villeirs, Geert
    Rouviere, Olivier
    Logager, Vibeke
    Futterer, Jurgen J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2012, 22 (04) : 746 - 757
  • [4] Prediction of prostate cancer extracapsular extension with high spatial resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced 3-T MRI
    Bloch, B. Nicolas
    Genega, Elizabeth M.
    Costa, Daniel N.
    Pedrosa, Ivan
    Smith, Martin P.
    Kressel, Herbert Y.
    Ngo, Long
    Sanda, Martin G.
    DeWolf, William C.
    Rofsky, Neil M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2012, 22 (10) : 2201 - 2210
  • [5] Prospective evaluation of systematic sextant transition zone biopsies in large prostates for cancer detection
    Chang, JJ
    Shinohara, K
    Hovey, RM
    Montgomery, C
    Presti, JC
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1998, 52 (01) : 89 - 93
  • [6] Central zone carcinoma of the prostate gland: A distinct tumor type with poor prognostic features
    Cohen, Ronald J.
    Shannon, Beverley A.
    Phillips, Michael
    Moorin, Rachael E.
    Wheeler, Thomas M.
    Garrett, Kerryn L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (05) : 1762 - 1767
  • [7] Discrimination of prostate cancer from normal peripheral zone and central gland tissue by using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging
    Engelbrecht, MR
    Huisman, HJ
    Laheij, RJF
    Jager, GJ
    van Leenders, GJLH
    Hulsbergen-Van De Kaa, CA
    de la Rosette, JJMCH
    Blickman, JG
    Barentsz, JO
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2003, 229 (01) : 248 - 254
  • [8] Diffusion Tensor Magnetic Resonance Tractography of the Prostate: Feasibility for Mapping Periprostatic Fibers
    Finley, David S.
    Ellingson, Benjamin M.
    Natarajan, Shyam
    Zaw, Taryar M.
    Raman, Steve S.
    Schulam, Peter
    Reiter, Robert E.
    Margolis, Daniel
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2012, 80 (01) : 219 - 223
  • [9] Evaluating pediatric brain tumor cellularity with diffusion-tensor imaging
    Gauvain, KM
    McKinstry, RC
    Mukherjee, P
    Perry, A
    Neil, JJ
    Kaufman, BA
    Hayashi, RJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2001, 177 (02) : 449 - 454
  • [10] Diffusion imaging of the prostate at 3.0 tesla
    Gibbs, P
    Pickles, MD
    Turnbull, LW
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2006, 41 (02) : 185 - 188