Yield and quality of sweet corn under deficit irrigation

被引:50
作者
Ertek, A. [1 ]
Kara, B. [2 ]
机构
[1] Suleyman Demirel Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Irrigat, TR-32200 Isparta, Turkey
[2] Suleyman Demirel Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Field Crops, TR-32200 Isparta, Turkey
关键词
Sweet corn; Drip irrigation; Yield and quality; Ear characteristics; MAIZE; SUNFLOWER; WATER;
D O I
10.1016/j.agwat.2013.07.012
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The present study was conducted to determine the effects of different irrigation levels (I-100: full irrigation; I-85: 15% deficit; I-70: 30% deficit; I-55: 45% deficit and I-40: 60% deficit) on yield and yield components, sugar and protein content of fresh sweet corn during the years of 2011 and 2012. Experiments were carried out in a randomized complete-block design with three replications. The lowest and the highest plant water consumptions (E-t) were found in I-40 (240-406 mm) and I-100 (348-504 mm) treatments in both years. Water deficit affected on maize fresh ear yields, yield components, quality and water use efficiencies. The lowest fresh ear yields (11515.7 and 10952.3 kg ha(-1)) were determined in I-40 treatments in both years, respectively. The highest fresh ear yields (14857.7 and 14712.7 kg ha(-1)) were obtained from I-100 treatments in 2011 and 2012 years, respectively. Maize fresh ear yields were significantly affected by water deficits. Low irrigation levels decreased the ear yields. However, it was clearly observed that I-70 treatment could be a water-saving treatment without a significant decrease in yield. In addition, the highest protein content and sugar amount was also observed in I-70 treatment. I-70 treatment seems to have lowest impact on yield and higher quality for sweet corn. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:138 / 144
页数:7
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Adrienn V. S., 2012, Australian Journal of Crop Science, V6, P381
  • [2] Physiological Determinants of Crop Growth and Yield in Maize, Sunflower and Soybean: Their Application to Crop Management Modeling and Breeding
    Andrade, F. H.
    Sadras, V. O.
    Vega, C. R. C.
    Echarte, L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CROP IMPROVEMENT, 2005, 14 (1-2) : 51 - 101
  • [3] [Anonymous], BASIC ANAL METHODS F
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1979, YIELD RESPONSE WATER
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1954, Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline and Alkali Soils, P160
  • [6] Ayla C., 1993, RAPOR SERISI, V87
  • [7] FACTORS AFFECTING YIELD AND QUALITY IN IRRIGATED WHEAT
    BARBER, JS
    JESSOP, RS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 1987, 109 : 19 - 26
  • [8] Bauer A., 1966, N DAKOTA AGR EXPT ST, V2413, P4
  • [9] CHOWDHURY N. H., 1997, J AGR RES, V5, P77
  • [10] Irrigation scheduling based on pan evaporation values for cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) grown under field conditions
    Ertek, A
    Sensoy, S
    Gedik, I
    Küçükyumuk, C
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2006, 81 (1-2) : 159 - 172