Lexical selection in bilinguals: Do words in the bilingual's two lexicons compete for selection?

被引:368
作者
Costa, A
Miozzo, M
Caramazza, A
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Dept Psychol, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[2] Univ Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
[3] MIT, Dept Brain & Cognit Sci, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
bilingualism; lexical access; naming; speech production;
D O I
10.1006/jmla.1999.2651
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
In a series of picture-word interference experiments, Catalan-Spanish bilinguals named pictures in Catalan with distracter words printed either in Catalan (same-language pairs) or in Spanish (different-language pairs). Naming was facilitated when the distracter was the name of the picture in both same[e.g., taula-taula (table in Catalan)] and different-language pairs [e.g., taula-mesa (table in Spanish)]. We also found that the facilitation effect was larger for same-language pairs and that semantically related distracters in the same- vs different-language conditions were similarly interfering. These results are interpreted within a lexical model that assumes that only words of the target language are considered for lexical selection and can, therefore, compete for selection. Converging evidence from several experiments indicates that the facilitation asymmetry for same name distracters arises because same-language distracters can activate target phonemes via nonlexical, grapheme phoneme conversion processes. Facilitation was obtained with phonologically related distracters for both same- and different-language conditions but not for their translations. The results suggest that nonlexical phonological processes contribute to the phonological facilitation effect, (C) 1999 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:365 / 397
页数:33
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]   Conceptual and lexical development in second language acquisition [J].
Altarriba, J ;
Mathis, KM .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1997, 36 (04) :550-568
[2]   The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts [J].
Andrews, S .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 1997, 4 (04) :439-461
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1978, BILINGUAL BRAIN
[4]   Masked orthographic priming in bilingual word recognition [J].
BijeljacBabic, R ;
Biardeau, A ;
Grainger, J .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1997, 25 (04) :447-457
[5]   PHONOLOGICAL CODING IN GOOD AND POOR READERS [J].
BRIGGS, P ;
UNDERWOOD, G .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 1982, 34 (01) :93-112
[6]   ON THE TIP OF THE TONGUE - WHAT CAUSES WORD FINDING FAILURES IN YOUNG AND OLDER ADULTS [J].
BURKE, DM ;
MACKAY, DG ;
WORTHLEY, JS ;
WADE, E .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1991, 30 (05) :542-579
[7]   How many levels of processing are there in lexical access? [J].
Caramazza, A .
COGNITIVE NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 14 (01) :177-208
[8]   SEMANTIC CLASSIFICATION BY BILINGUALS [J].
CARAMAZZA, A ;
BRONES, I .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE, 1980, 34 (01) :77-81
[9]   The relation between syntactic and phonological knowledge in lexical access: evidence from the 'tip-of-the-tongue' phenomenon [J].
Caramazza, A ;
Miozzo, M .
COGNITION, 1997, 64 (03) :309-343
[10]   DEVELOPMENT OF STROOP INTERFERENCE IN CHINESE-ENGLISH BILINGUALS [J].
CHEN, HC ;
HO, C .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1986, 12 (03) :397-401