Randomized trials and endpoints in advanced HCC: Role of PFS as a surrogate of survival

被引:166
作者
Llovet, Josep M. [1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ]
Montal, Robert [1 ,5 ]
Villanueva, Augusto [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Barcelona, Hosp Clin Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Liver Unit,Translat Res Hepat Oncol, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
[2] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Div Liver Dis, Tisch Canc Inst, Mt Sinai Liver Canc Program, New York, NY 10029 USA
[3] ICREA, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
[4] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Med, Div Hematol & Med Oncol, New York, NY 10029 USA
[5] IDIBAPS Hosp Clin, Translat Res Hepat Oncol, Rossello 153, Barcelona 08039, Catalonia, Spain
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Trial design; Liver cancer; Systemic therapies; FDA approval; ADVANCED HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; RESPONSE EVALUATION CRITERIA; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; SOLID TUMORS RECIST; PHASE-III; CLINICAL-TRIALS; DOUBLE-BLIND; OPEN-LABEL; HEPATOBILIARY CANCERS; EUROPEAN ASSOCIATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhep.2019.01.028
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a major cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Around half of patients with HCC will receive systemic therapies during their life span. The pivotal positive sorafenib trial and regulatory approval in 2007 was followed by a decade of negative studies with drugs leading to marginal antitumoral efficacy, toxicity, or trials with a lack of enrichment strategies. This trend has changed over the last 2 years with several compounds, such as lenvatinib (in first-line) and regorafenib, cabozantinib, ramucirumab and nivolumab (in second-line), showing clinical benefit. These successes came at a cost of increasing the complexity of decision-making, and ultimately, impacting the design of future clinical trials. Nowadays, life expectancy with single active agents has surpassed the threshold of 1 year and sequential strategies have provided encouraging outcomes. Overall survival (OS) remains the main end-point in phase III investigations, but as in other solid tumours, there is a clear need to define surrogate end-points that both reliably recapitulate survival benefits and can be assessed before additional efficacious drugs are administered. A thorough analysis of 21 phase III trials published in advanced HCC demonstrated a moderate correlation between progression-free survival (PFS) or time to progression (TTP) and OS (R = 0.84 and R = 0.83, respectively). Nonetheless, the significant differences in PFS identified in 7 phase III studies only correlated with differences in OS in 3 cases. In these cases, the hazard ratio (HR) for PFS was <= 0.6. Thus, this threshold is herein proposed as a potential surrogate endpoint of OS in advanced HCC. Conversely, PFS with an HR between 0.6-0.7, despite significance, was not associated with better survival, and thus these magnitudes are considered uncertain surrogates. In the current review, we discuss the reasons for positive or negative phase III trials in advanced HCC, and the strengths and limitations of surrogate endpoints (PFS, TTP and objective response rate [ORR]) to predict survival. (C) 2019 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1262 / 1277
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Surrogate end points for survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors
    Zhu, Andrew X.
    Lin, Yong
    Ferry, David
    Widau, Ryan C.
    Saha, Abhijoy
    [J]. IMMUNOTHERAPY, 2022, 14 (16) : 1341 - 1351
  • [42] Prognostic and Predictive Factors in Patients with Advanced HCC and Elevated Alpha-Fetoprotein Treated with Ramucirumab in Two Randomized Phase III Trials
    Llovet, Josep M.
    Singal, Amit G.
    Villanueva, Augusto
    Finn, Richard S.
    Kudo, Masatoshi
    Galle, Peter R.
    Ikeda, Masafumi
    Callies, Sophie
    McGrath, Louise M.
    Wang, Chunxiao
    Abada, Paolo
    Widau, Ryan C.
    Gonzalez-Gugel, Elena
    Zhu, Andrew X.
    [J]. CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2022, 28 (11) : 2297 - 2305
  • [43] Alternate Endpoints for Phase II Trials in Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors
    Imaoka, Hiroshi
    Sasaki, Mitsuhito
    Takahashi, Hideaki
    Hashimoto, Yusuke
    Ohno, Izumi
    Mitsunaga, Shuichi
    Watanabe, Kazuo
    Umemoto, Kumiko
    Kimura, Gen
    Suzuki, Yuko
    Kan, Motoyasu
    Ikeda, Masafumi
    [J]. ONCOLOGIST, 2019, 24 (01) : 47 - 53
  • [44] A rationale for expanding the endpoints for clinical trials in advanced pancreatic carcinoma
    Rothenberg, ML
    Abbruzzese, JL
    Moore, M
    Portenoy, RK
    Robertson, JM
    Wanebo, HJ
    [J]. CANCER, 1996, 78 (03) : 627 - 632
  • [45] Power analysis for cluster randomized trials with continuous coprimary endpoints
    Yang, Siyun
    Moerbeek, Mirjam
    Taljaard, Monica
    Li, Fan
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 2023, 79 (02) : 1293 - 1305
  • [46] Clinical Trials of Cannabidiol for Substance Use Disorders: Outcome Measures, Surrogate Endpoints, and Biomarkers
    Morel, Alix
    Lebard, Pierre
    Dereux, Alexandra
    Azuar, Julien
    Questel, Frank
    Bellivier, Frank
    Marie-Claire, Cynthia
    Fatseas, Melina
    Vorspan, Florence
    Bloch, Vanessa
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2021, 12
  • [47] Estimating survival scenarios in advanced or metastatic gastric and oesophageal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review of randomized-controlled trials
    Naher, Sayeda K.
    Mercieca-Bebber, Rebecca
    Siu, Derrick
    Stockler, Martin R.
    Kiely, Belinda E.
    Grimison, Peter
    [J]. CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2024, 40 (08) : 1357 - 1367
  • [48] Properties of a nonparametric test for early comparison of treatments in clinical trials in the presence of surrogate endpoints
    Venkatraman, ES
    Begg, CB
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 1999, 55 (04) : 1171 - 1176
  • [49] Surrogacy of intermediate endpoints for overall survival in randomized controlled trials of first-line treatment for advanced soft tissue sarcoma in the pre- and post-pazopanib era: a meta-analytic evaluation
    Tanaka, Kazuhiro
    Kawano, Masanori
    Iwasaki, Tatsuya
    Itonaga, Ichiro
    Tsumura, Hiroshi
    [J]. BMC CANCER, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [50] Incorporating patient centered benefits as endpoints in randomized trials of maintenance therapies in advanced ovarian cancer: A position paper from the GCIG symptom benefit committee
    Kurtz, Jean-Emmanuel
    Gebski, Val
    Sukhin, Vladyslav
    Carey, Mark
    Kong, Iwa
    Glasspool, Rosalind M.
    Berek, Jonathan S.
    Batista, Mariana de Paiva
    Hall, Marcia
    Kim, Jae-Weon
    Yeoshoua, Effi
    Fujiwara, Noriko
    Nam, Byung-Ho
    Polleis, Sandra
    Lee, Jung-Yun
    Strojna, Aleksandra
    Farrelly, Laura
    Schwameis, Richard
    Fossati, Roldano
    Darlington, Anne-Sophie
    Lai, Chyong-Huey
    Wright, Alexi A.
    Rosenblat, Orgad
    Harter, Phillip
    Roxburgh, Patricia
    Chowdhury, Rahul Roy
    Chang, Ting-Chang
    Paoletti, Xavier
    Friedlander, Michael
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2021, 161 (02) : 502 - 507