Randomized trials and endpoints in advanced HCC: Role of PFS as a surrogate of survival

被引:163
|
作者
Llovet, Josep M. [1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ]
Montal, Robert [1 ,5 ]
Villanueva, Augusto [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Barcelona, Hosp Clin Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Liver Unit,Translat Res Hepat Oncol, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
[2] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Div Liver Dis, Tisch Canc Inst, Mt Sinai Liver Canc Program, New York, NY 10029 USA
[3] ICREA, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
[4] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Med, Div Hematol & Med Oncol, New York, NY 10029 USA
[5] IDIBAPS Hosp Clin, Translat Res Hepat Oncol, Rossello 153, Barcelona 08039, Catalonia, Spain
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Trial design; Liver cancer; Systemic therapies; FDA approval; ADVANCED HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; RESPONSE EVALUATION CRITERIA; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; SOLID TUMORS RECIST; PHASE-III; CLINICAL-TRIALS; DOUBLE-BLIND; OPEN-LABEL; HEPATOBILIARY CANCERS; EUROPEAN ASSOCIATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhep.2019.01.028
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a major cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Around half of patients with HCC will receive systemic therapies during their life span. The pivotal positive sorafenib trial and regulatory approval in 2007 was followed by a decade of negative studies with drugs leading to marginal antitumoral efficacy, toxicity, or trials with a lack of enrichment strategies. This trend has changed over the last 2 years with several compounds, such as lenvatinib (in first-line) and regorafenib, cabozantinib, ramucirumab and nivolumab (in second-line), showing clinical benefit. These successes came at a cost of increasing the complexity of decision-making, and ultimately, impacting the design of future clinical trials. Nowadays, life expectancy with single active agents has surpassed the threshold of 1 year and sequential strategies have provided encouraging outcomes. Overall survival (OS) remains the main end-point in phase III investigations, but as in other solid tumours, there is a clear need to define surrogate end-points that both reliably recapitulate survival benefits and can be assessed before additional efficacious drugs are administered. A thorough analysis of 21 phase III trials published in advanced HCC demonstrated a moderate correlation between progression-free survival (PFS) or time to progression (TTP) and OS (R = 0.84 and R = 0.83, respectively). Nonetheless, the significant differences in PFS identified in 7 phase III studies only correlated with differences in OS in 3 cases. In these cases, the hazard ratio (HR) for PFS was <= 0.6. Thus, this threshold is herein proposed as a potential surrogate endpoint of OS in advanced HCC. Conversely, PFS with an HR between 0.6-0.7, despite significance, was not associated with better survival, and thus these magnitudes are considered uncertain surrogates. In the current review, we discuss the reasons for positive or negative phase III trials in advanced HCC, and the strengths and limitations of surrogate endpoints (PFS, TTP and objective response rate [ORR]) to predict survival. (C) 2019 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1262 / 1277
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] How well do surrogate endpoints and overall survival endpoints in clinical trials predict real-world survival?
    Shafrin, Jason
    Brookmeyer, Ron
    Peneva, Desi
    Park, Jinhee
    Zhang, Jie
    Figlin, Robert A.
    Lakdawalla, Darius N.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (15)
  • [22] Surrogate endpoints for overall survival (OS) in advanced pancreatic cancer (APC): Analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) exploring gemcitabine (G)-based combinations
    Milella, M.
    Bria, E.
    Carlini, P.
    Cuppone, F.
    Gelibter, A.
    Nistico, C.
    Ruggeri, E. M.
    Terzoli, E.
    Cognetti, F.
    Giannarelli, D.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (18)
  • [23] The current role and limitations of surrogate endpoints in advanced prostate cancer
    Gomella, Leonard G.
    Sartor, A. Oliver
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2014, 32 (01) : 28.e1 - 28.e9
  • [24] Potential surrogate endpoints for overall survival in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an analysis of a phase III randomized trial
    Chen, Yu-Pei
    Chen, Yong
    Zhang, Wen-Na
    Liang, Shao-Bo
    Zong, Jing-Feng
    Chen, Lei
    Mao, Yan-Ping
    Tang, Ling-Long
    Li, Wen-Fei
    Liu, Xu
    Guo, Ying
    Lin, Ai-Hua
    Liu, Meng-Zhong
    Sun, Ying
    Ma, Jun
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2015, 5
  • [25] Potential surrogate endpoints for overall survival in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an analysis of a phase III randomized trial
    Yu-Pei Chen
    Yong Chen
    Wen-Na Zhang
    Shao-Bo Liang
    Jing-Feng Zong
    Lei Chen
    Yan-Ping Mao
    Ling-Long Tang
    Wen-Fei Li
    Xu Liu
    Ying Guo
    Ai-Hua Lin
    Meng-Zhong Liu
    Ying Sun
    Jun Ma
    Scientific Reports, 5
  • [26] SURROGATE ENDPOINTS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS
    FRIEDMAN, L
    YUSUF, S
    CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1985, 6 (03): : 222 - 222
  • [27] Surrogate Efficacy Endpoints in Oncology Trials
    Maurie Markman
    Pharmaceutical Medicine, 2009, 23 (5-6) : 283 - 287
  • [28] OMARKERS AS SURROGATE ENDPOINTS IN CLINICAL TRIALS
    Rosenkranz, Bernd
    MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2010, 19 : S31 - S32
  • [29] Assessing Correlation between Surrogate Endpoints and Overall Survival for Oncology Clinical Trials
    Chu, Guotao
    Zhu, Xiaochen
    Wu, Jiaju
    Tang, Yike
    Luu, Jonathan
    He, Chunsheng
    Huang, Shu-Pang
    Liu, Liangang
    Hsieh, Hsin-Ju
    CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2025,
  • [30] Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints in clinical trials
    Fleming, Thomas R.
    Powers, John H.
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2012, 31 (25) : 2973 - 2984