Randomized trials and endpoints in advanced HCC: Role of PFS as a surrogate of survival

被引:163
|
作者
Llovet, Josep M. [1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ]
Montal, Robert [1 ,5 ]
Villanueva, Augusto [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Barcelona, Hosp Clin Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Liver Unit,Translat Res Hepat Oncol, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
[2] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Div Liver Dis, Tisch Canc Inst, Mt Sinai Liver Canc Program, New York, NY 10029 USA
[3] ICREA, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
[4] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Med, Div Hematol & Med Oncol, New York, NY 10029 USA
[5] IDIBAPS Hosp Clin, Translat Res Hepat Oncol, Rossello 153, Barcelona 08039, Catalonia, Spain
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Trial design; Liver cancer; Systemic therapies; FDA approval; ADVANCED HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; RESPONSE EVALUATION CRITERIA; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; SOLID TUMORS RECIST; PHASE-III; CLINICAL-TRIALS; DOUBLE-BLIND; OPEN-LABEL; HEPATOBILIARY CANCERS; EUROPEAN ASSOCIATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhep.2019.01.028
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a major cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Around half of patients with HCC will receive systemic therapies during their life span. The pivotal positive sorafenib trial and regulatory approval in 2007 was followed by a decade of negative studies with drugs leading to marginal antitumoral efficacy, toxicity, or trials with a lack of enrichment strategies. This trend has changed over the last 2 years with several compounds, such as lenvatinib (in first-line) and regorafenib, cabozantinib, ramucirumab and nivolumab (in second-line), showing clinical benefit. These successes came at a cost of increasing the complexity of decision-making, and ultimately, impacting the design of future clinical trials. Nowadays, life expectancy with single active agents has surpassed the threshold of 1 year and sequential strategies have provided encouraging outcomes. Overall survival (OS) remains the main end-point in phase III investigations, but as in other solid tumours, there is a clear need to define surrogate end-points that both reliably recapitulate survival benefits and can be assessed before additional efficacious drugs are administered. A thorough analysis of 21 phase III trials published in advanced HCC demonstrated a moderate correlation between progression-free survival (PFS) or time to progression (TTP) and OS (R = 0.84 and R = 0.83, respectively). Nonetheless, the significant differences in PFS identified in 7 phase III studies only correlated with differences in OS in 3 cases. In these cases, the hazard ratio (HR) for PFS was <= 0.6. Thus, this threshold is herein proposed as a potential surrogate endpoint of OS in advanced HCC. Conversely, PFS with an HR between 0.6-0.7, despite significance, was not associated with better survival, and thus these magnitudes are considered uncertain surrogates. In the current review, we discuss the reasons for positive or negative phase III trials in advanced HCC, and the strengths and limitations of surrogate endpoints (PFS, TTP and objective response rate [ORR]) to predict survival. (C) 2019 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1262 / 1277
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Surrogate endpoints in randomized cardiovascular clinical trials
    Domanski, Michael
    Pocock, Stuart
    Bernaud, Corine
    Borer, Jeffrey
    Geller, Nancy
    Revkin, James
    Zannad, Faiez
    FUNDAMENTAL & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2011, 25 (04) : 411 - 413
  • [2] Statistical challenges in the evaluation of surrogate endpoints in randomized trials
    Molenberghs, G
    Buyse, M
    Geys, H
    Renard, D
    Burzykowski, T
    Alonso, A
    CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 2002, 23 (06): : 607 - 625
  • [3] Surrogate endpoints for overall survival in randomized clinical trials testing antibody-drug conjugates
    Pala, Laura
    Merlo, Federico
    Sala, Isabella
    Pagan, Eleonora
    Oriecuia, Chiara
    Specchia, Claudia
    Catania, Chiara
    Cocorocchio, Emilia
    Laszlo, Daniele
    Ceresoli, Giovanni
    Locatelli, Marzia
    De Pas, Tommaso
    Zambelli, Alberto
    Cortes, Javier
    Giaccone, Giuseppe
    Moore, Kathleen N.
    Bardia, Aditya
    Viale, Giuseppe
    Gelber, Richard D.
    Bagnardi, Vincenzo
    Conforti, Fabio
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2025,
  • [4] The validity of progression-free survival (PFS) 2 as a surrogate endpoint for overall survival (OS) in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of advanced solid tumors.
    Woodford, Rachel
    Zhou, Deborah
    Kok, Peey-Sei
    Lord, Sally
    Marschner, Ian
    Friedlander, Michael
    Lee, Chee Khoon
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 39 (15)
  • [5] Progression-free survival (PFS) as a surrogate for overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: An analysis of 3159 patients randomized in 11 trials.
    Buyse, M
    Burzykowski, T
    Carroll, K
    Michiels, S
    Pignon, JP
    Piedbois, P
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (16) : 249S - 249S
  • [6] SURROGATE ENDPOINTS AS PREDICTORS OF SURVIVAL IN METASTATIC UROTHELIAL CANCER TRIALS
    Ghali, Fady
    Patel, Devin
    Jewell, Teresa
    Gore, John
    Wright, Jonathan
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 207 (05): : E980 - E980
  • [7] Surrogate endpoints for overall survival in lung cancer trials: a review
    Fiteni, Frederic
    Westeel, Virginie
    Bonnetain, Franck
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2017, 17 (05) : 447 - 454
  • [8] Surrogate and Intermediate Endpoints in Randomized Trials: What's the Goal?
    Korn, Edward L.
    Freidlin, Boris
    CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2018, 24 (10) : 2239 - 2240
  • [9] PFS as a surrogate end point for OS in advanced colorectal cancer trials
    Nature Clinical Practice Oncology, 2008, 5 (5): : 245 - 245
  • [10] Surrogate Endpoints for Overall Survival in Immune- Oncology Trials of Advanced Gastro-Esophageal Carcinoma
    Li, Yuan Fang
    Wang, Yun
    Zhou, Jie
    Wei, Yi Cheng
    Lin, Jun
    Yin, Yi Xin
    Chen, Guo Ming
    Zhang, Fei Yang
    Chen, Shi
    Zhou, Zhi Wei
    Chen, Ying Bo
    Nie, Run Cong
    WORLD JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY, 2022, 13 (03) : 126 - 135