Vegetation community response to hydrologic and geomorphic changes following dam removal

被引:16
作者
Lisius, G. L. [1 ]
Snyder, N. P. [1 ]
Collins, M. J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Boston Coll, Dept Earth & Environm Sci, Chestnut Hill, MA 02167 USA
[2] Natl Marine Fisheries Serv, NOAA Restorat Ctr, Gloucester, MA USA
关键词
dam removal; restoration ecology; stream restoration; vegetation change; SALT-MARSH; RESTORATION; ECOLOGY;
D O I
10.1002/rra.3261
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Dam removal can restore fish passage, natural flow regimes, sediment transport in streams, dispersal of organic matter, and drift of aquatic insects. However, dam removal also impacts the riparian vegetation, with both immediate and delayed responses. In this study, we measure vegetation change at the Merrimack Village Dam site on the Souhegan River in Merrimack, NH, USA. The August 2008 removal caused a similar to 3-m drop in water level and rapid erosion of impounded sediment, with similar to 50% removed in the first 3months. Terrace, floodplain, and wetland communities were surveyed in summer 2007, 2009, 2014, and 2015. Temporal change was quantified using Analysis of Similarity on the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity matrix. Only herbaceous vegetation closest to the river channel and in the off-channel wetland changed significantly. The herbaceous plots directly adjacent to the impoundment eroded to bare sand in 2009, but by 2014, the original riparian fringe community had re-established in the newly developed floodplain. Between 2007 and 2014, the off-channel wetland area changed from aquatic species to a stable terrestrial community that persisted without significant change in 2015. The vegetation response was greatest in areas with the largest geomorphic and hydrologic change. These included the channel margin where erosion and bank slumping created an unstable scarp. The mid-channel island and off-channel wetland were strongly affected by the lowered water table. However, large unvegetated areas never persisted nor did the areal coverage of invasive species expand, which are two frequent concerns of dam removal stakeholders.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 327
页数:11
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Bellmore J.R., 2016, WiREs Water, DOI DOI 10.1002/WAT2.1164
[2]  
Borcard D, 2011, USE R, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-7976-6
[3]  
Collins M. J., 2007, GULF MAINE COUNCIL M, V85
[4]   Channel response to sediment release: insights from a paired analysis of dam removal [J].
Collins, Mathias J. ;
Snyder, Noah P. ;
Boardman, Graham ;
Banks, William S. L. ;
Andrews, Mary ;
Baker, Matthew E. ;
Conlon, Maricate ;
Gellis, Allen ;
McClain, Serena ;
Miller, Andrew ;
Wilcock, Peter .
EARTH SURFACE PROCESSES AND LANDFORMS, 2017, 42 (11) :1636-1651
[5]  
Doyle M. W., 2005, MANAGING WATERSHEDS, P1
[6]  
Elzinga C. L., 1998, MEASURING MONITORING
[7]  
Lisius G.L., 2016, THESIS
[8]   The ecology of interfaces: Riparian zones [J].
Naiman, RJ ;
Decamps, H .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS, 1997, 28 :621-658
[9]  
Oksanen J., 2013, COMMUNITY ECOLOGY PA, V2
[10]   Vegetation development and restoration potential of drained reservoirs following dam removal in Wisconsin [J].
Orr, CH ;
Stanley, EH .
RIVER RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2006, 22 (03) :281-295