Synthesized biocompatible and conductive ink for 3D printing of flexible electronics

被引:37
|
作者
Farizhandi, Amir Abbas Kazemzadeh [1 ]
Khalajabadi, Shahrouz Zamani [1 ]
Krishnadoss, Vaishali [1 ]
Noshadi, Iman [1 ]
机构
[1] Rowan Univ, Sch Chem Engn, 201 Mullica Hill Rd, Glassboro, NJ 08028 USA
关键词
Bioink; 3D printing; Conductive biomaterial; Flexible biopolymer; Metal-polymer biocomposites; POLYMERS; SCAFFOLDS; HYDROGEL; BIOINK; BIOMATERIALS; ALGINATE; CELLS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103960
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Three-dimensional (3D) printing is an efficient technique for the fabrication of electronic devices. It also enables the use conductive of biomaterials in various applications, such as implants and flexible devices. Designing a new bioink is extremely challenging. For bioelectronics devices, bioink materials should be printable, flexible, conductive, harmless to cells, and sufficiently strong to maintain their shape when immersed in nutrients or under pressure. Over the past few years, several flexible conductive bioinks have been developed that are based on composite pastes containing a biopolymer and conductive micro- and nanoscale materials in the form of metallic particles, conducting polymers, or a mixture of them. Herein, we report a new strategy for the fabrication of a bioink for a commercial 3D printer with the desired conductivity, mechanical properties, and biocompatibility, using a poly(glycerol-co-sebacate) (PGS)-based polymer and zinc. The PGS-based polymer and lithium phenyl-2,4,6-trimethylbenzoylphosphinate (as a photoinitiator) were added to the zinc, and then, the prepared bioink was polymerized during 3D printing under visible light. According to a microstructural investigation using scanning electron microscopy, the zinc particles were homogeneously distributed in the PGSA matrix. The conductivity of bioink increases with chemical sintering and with an increase in the amount of zinc particles. Based on rheology tests, the appropriate printable composition is 60% zinc and 40% PGS-based polymer. This bioink exhibited remarkable mechanical and adhesive properties in comparison with the PGS-based polymer without zinc, according to tensile, compression, lap shear, wound closure, and burst pressure modules. In vitro and in vivo results indicated that the bioink was not toxic to the cells or the animal over a period of culturing.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Collagen as a bio-ink for 3D printing: a critical review
    Debnath, Souvik
    Agrawal, Akhilesh
    Jain, Nipun
    Chatterjee, Kaushik
    Player, Darren J.
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY B, 2025, 13 (06) : 1890 - 1919
  • [32] Materials Testing for the Development of Biocompatible Devices through Vat-Polymerization 3D Printing
    Gonzalez, Gustavo
    Baruffaldi, Desiree
    Martinengo, Cinzia
    Angelini, Angelo
    Chiappone, Annalisa
    Roppolo, Ignazio
    Pirri, Candido Fabrizio
    Frascella, Francesca
    NANOMATERIALS, 2020, 10 (09) : 1 - 13
  • [33] A self-healing, adaptive and conductive polymer composite ink for 3D printing of gas sensors
    Wu, Tongfei
    Gray, Euan
    Chen, Biqiong
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY C, 2018, 6 (23) : 6200 - 6207
  • [34] A Novel Integrated Dielectric-and-Conductive Ink 3D Printing Technique for Fabrication of Microwave Devices
    Ahmadloo, Majid
    Mousavi, Pedram
    2013 IEEE MTT-S INTERNATIONAL MICROWAVE SYMPOSIUM DIGEST (IMS), 2013,
  • [35] Liquid-phase 3D bioprinting of gelatin alginate hydrogels: influence of printing parameters on hydrogel line width and layer height
    Alruwaili, Maha
    Lopez, Jose A.
    McCarthy, Kevin
    Reynaud, Emmanuel G.
    Rodriguez, Brian J.
    BIO-DESIGN AND MANUFACTURING, 2019, 2 (03) : 172 - 180
  • [36] Recent trends in bioinks for 3D printing
    Gopinathan J.
    Noh I.
    Biomaterials Research, 22 (1)
  • [37] Direct Ink Writing: A 3D Printing Technology for Diverse Materials
    Saadi, M. A. S. R.
    Maguire, Alianna
    Pottackal, Neethu T.
    Thakur, Md Shajedul Hoque
    Ikram, Maruf Md
    Hart, A. John
    Ajayan, Pulickel M.
    Rahman, Muhammad M.
    ADVANCED MATERIALS, 2022, 34 (28)
  • [38] Highly Conductive 3D Printable Materials for 3D Structural Electronics
    Baker, Daina, V
    Bao, Chao
    Kim, Woo Soo
    ACS APPLIED ELECTRONIC MATERIALS, 2021, 3 (06) : 2423 - 2433
  • [39] Recent advances on 3D printing in hard and soft tissue engineering
    Janmohammadi, Mahsa
    Nourbakhsh, Mohammad Sadegh
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF POLYMERIC MATERIALS AND POLYMERIC BIOMATERIALS, 2020, 69 (07) : 449 - 466
  • [40] Nanoporous, Gas Permeable PEGDA Ink for 3D Printing Organ-on-a-Chip Devices
    Karamzadeh, Vahid
    Shen, Molly L.
    Shafique, Houda
    Lussier, Felix
    Juncker, David
    ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS, 2024, 34 (28)