Empirical Study of Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Ensemble Models for Software Development Effort Estimation

被引:42
作者
Elish, Mahmoud O. [1 ]
Helmy, Tarek [1 ,2 ]
Hussain, Muhammad Imtiaz [1 ]
机构
[1] King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals, Dept Informat & Comp Sci, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
[2] Tanta Univ, Coll Engn, Tanta, Egypt
关键词
NEURAL-NETWORK; PROJECT EFFORT; PREDICTION; REGRESSION;
D O I
10.1155/2013/312067
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Accurate estimation of software development effort is essential for effective management and control of software development projects. Many software effort estimation methods have been proposed in the literature including computational intelligence models. However, none of the existing models proved to be suitable under all circumstances; that is, their performance varies from one dataset to another. The goal of an ensemble model is to manage each of its individual models' strengths and weaknesses automatically, leading to the best possible decision being taken overall. In this paper, we have developed different homogeneous and heterogeneous ensembles of optimized hybrid computational intelligence models for software development effort estimation. Different linear and nonlinear combiners have been used to combine the base hybrid learners. We have conducted an empirical study to evaluate and compare the performance of these ensembles using five popular datasets. The results confirm that individual models are not reliable as their performance is inconsistent and unstable across different datasets. Although none of the ensemble models was consistently the best, many of them were frequently among the best models for each dataset. The homogeneous ensemble of support vector regression (SVR), with the nonlinear combiner adaptive neurofuzzy inference systems-subtractive clustering (ANFIS-SC), was the best model when considering the average rank of each model across the five datasets.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   SOFTWARE FUNCTION, SOURCE LINES OF CODE, AND DEVELOPMENT EFFORT PREDICTION - A SOFTWARE SCIENCE VALIDATION [J].
ALBRECHT, AJ ;
GAFFNEY, JE .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 1983, 9 (06) :639-648
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Applied Statistics for Software Managers
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1981, Software Engineering Economics
[4]  
Araújo RD, 2009, PROC INT C TOOLS ART, P630, DOI 10.1109/ICTAI.2009.39
[5]  
Baskeles B, 2007, 2007 22ND INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER AND INFORMATION SCIENCES, P208
[6]   Bagging predictors for estimation of software project effort [J].
Braga, Petronio L. ;
Oliveira, Adriano L. I. ;
Ribeiro, Gustavo H. T. ;
Meira, Silvio R. L. .
2007 IEEE INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON NEURAL NETWORKS, VOLS 1-6, 2007, :1595-+
[7]  
Brown G., 2005, Information Fusion, V6, P5, DOI 10.1016/j.inffus.2004.04.004
[8]   Can genetic programming improve software effort estimation? A comparative evaluation [J].
Burgess, CJ ;
Lefley, M .
INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 43 (14) :863-873
[9]   Why software fails [J].
Charette, RN .
IEEE SPECTRUM, 2005, 42 (09) :42-49
[10]   The adjusted analogy-based software effort estimation based on similarity distances [J].
Chiu, Nan-Hsing ;
Huang, Sun-Jen .
JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE, 2007, 80 (04) :628-640