Exploring sources of public attitudes toward capital punishment in Taiwan

被引:2
作者
Cao, Liqun [1 ]
Lai, Yung-Lien [2 ]
Huang, Chia-Chen [2 ]
机构
[1] Ontario Tech Univ, Fac Social Sci & Humanities, 55 Bond St East, Oshawa, ON, Canada
[2] Cent Police Univ, Dept Crime Prevent & Correct, Taoyuan 33304, Taiwan
关键词
DEATH-PENALTY; RACIAL DIVIDE; SOUTH-KOREA; SUPPORT; EXECUTIONS; TOLERANCE; CRIME;
D O I
10.1007/s10611-020-09913-2
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Capital punishment policy deserves a more prominent place in the analysis of the politics of Taiwan. While Taiwan's political culture is on a par with the mainstream of the world's democratic politics, its public opinion on capital crime policy is under-researched. This study begins with an historical review of capital punishment in Taiwan. After that, we turn to an in-depth analysis of data from a random survey in Taipei and New Taipei, focusing on the government's retentionist policy rather than an exploration of general attitudes toward the death penalty. Results indicate that support for death penalty policy and for the Ministry of Justice's execution policy stems mainly from instrumental sources: Belief in the deterrent effect of capital sentences and faith in a "tough on crime" approach as a generic cure for crime. In contrast, those who believe in the efficacy of rehabilitation tend to oppose capital punishment policy. Unexpectedly, experience with crime victimization and perception of high crime levels in one's residential neighborhood reduce support for capital punishment policy. We end our analysis with a call to political leaders to exercise enlightened leadership on the death sentence policy.
引用
收藏
页码:571 / 588
页数:18
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
Amnesty International, 2018, AB RET COUNTR JUL 20
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2017, The News Lens
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, UK DEATH PENALTY PRO
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2017, CROSS NATL PUBLIC OP
[5]   International Norms, Domestic Politics, and the Death Penalty Comparing Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan [J].
Bae, Sangmin .
COMPARATIVE POLITICS, 2011, 44 (01) :41-+
[6]  
Bakken B, 2014, ROUTLEDGE HANDBOOK OF CHINESE CRIMINOLOGY, P38
[7]  
BBC, 2010, BBC NEWS
[8]  
Browning SandraLee., 1992, JUSTICE Q, V9, P685
[9]  
Cao L, 2014, ROUTL FRONT CRIMINOL, V18, P1
[10]   China and "La questione criminale" ("the criminal question"): Revolutionary and reformist periods [J].
Cao, Liqun ;
Hebenton, Bill .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LAW CRIME AND JUSTICE, 2018, 52 :98-105