Properties of rule interestingness measures and alternative approaches to normalization of measures

被引:39
作者
Greco, Salvatore [2 ]
Slowinski, Roman [1 ,3 ]
Szczech, Izabela [1 ]
机构
[1] Poznan Univ Tech, Inst Comp Sci, PL-60965 Poznan, Poland
[2] Univ Catania, Dept Econ & Business, I-95129 Catania, Italy
[3] Polish Acad Sci, Syst Res Inst, PL-01447 Warsaw, Poland
关键词
Rule interestingness measures; Properties of measures; Confirmation; Normalization; BAYESIAN CONFIRMATION MEASURES; ROUGH MEMBERSHIP; DECISION; SUPPORT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ins.2012.05.018
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
We are considering properties of interestingness measures of rule; induced from data. These are: Bayesian confirmation property, two properties related to the case of entailment or refutation, called (Ex(1)) and logicality L, and a group of symmetry properties. We propose a modification of properties (Ex(1)) and L, called weak (Ex(1)), and weak 1, that deploy the concept of confirmation in its larger sense. We demonstrate that properties (Ex(1)) and L do not fully reflect such understanding of the confirmation concept, and thus, we propose to substitute (Ex(1)) by weak (Ex(1)) and L by weak L Moreover, we introduce four new approaches to normalization of confirmation measures in order to transform measures so that they would obtain desired properties. The analysis of the results of the normalizations of the confirmation measures takes into account all considered properties. We advocate for two normalized confirmation measures: measure Z considered in the literature, and newly proposed measure A. Finally, we provide some ideas for combining them in a single measure keeping all desirable properties. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 16
页数:16
相关论文
共 41 条
[21]  
Greco Salvatore, 2010, Computational Intelligence for Knowledge-Based Systems Design. Proceedings 13th International Conference on Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty, IPMU 2010, P230, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-14049-5_24
[22]   Parameterized rough set model using rough membership and Bayesian confirmation measures [J].
Greco, Salvatore ;
Matarazzo, Benedetto ;
Slowinski, Roman .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING, 2008, 49 (02) :285-300
[23]  
Greco S, 2008, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT, V5097, P556, DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-69731-2_54
[24]  
Greco S, 2009, CONTROL CYBERN, V38, P9
[25]  
Hempel C. G., 1945, MIND, V54, P1, DOI DOI 10.1093/MIND/LIV.213.1
[26]  
Kolmogorov A.N., 1956, Foundations of Probability
[27]   On selecting interestingness measures for association rules: User oriented description and multiple criteria decision aid [J].
Lenca, Philippe ;
Meyer, Patrick ;
Vaillant, Benoit ;
Lallich, Stephane .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2008, 184 (02) :610-626
[28]  
Maher P., 2005, ENCY PHILOS
[29]   A survey of interestingness measures for knowledge discovery [J].
McGarry, K .
KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING REVIEW, 2005, 20 (01) :39-61
[30]  
Mortimer H, 1988, LOGIC INDUCTION