MR imaging in probably benign lesions (BI-RADS category 3) of the breast

被引:24
作者
Gökalp, G [1 ]
Topal, U [1 ]
机构
[1] Uludag Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, TR-16059 Bursa, Turkey
关键词
probably benign lesions; BI-RADS; mammography; breast MR imaging;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2005.10.004
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To investigate the role of dynamic magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the evaluation of probably benign lesions (BI-RADS category 3) and its contribution to patient management. Materials and methods: Dynamic breast MR imaging was performed in 56 lesions assessed as probably benign in mammography of 43 patients. In MR imaging, T2-weighted turbo spin echo (TSE) with fat suppression sequence followed by pre- and post-contrast T1-weighted 3D-FLASH sequences were used. MR imaging findings were scored using 0-2 point criterion scale. The lesions were divided into five groups according to their total score (0 point: group 1, negative; 1-2 points: group 2, benign; 3 points: group 3, probably benign; 4-5 points: group 4, suspicious for malignancy; 6-8 points: group 5, highly suggestive of malignancy). Histopathologic verification of lesions in group 4 and above was obtained. Lesions in group 3 were either biopsied or followed up by mammography or MR imaging. Lesions in group 1-2 were followed by mammography of 6-month intervals for 2 years. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values of MR imaging in the determination of malignancy in BI-RADS category 3 lesions were calculated. Results: Fifty-six findings (45 mass, 9 breast tissue, 2 focal enhancement) in 43 patients were detected in MR imaging. According to their total score, 41 lesions (73.2%) and breast tissue had 0 point (group 1); 10 lesions (17.8%) had 1-2 points (group 2); 2 lesions (3.6%) had 3 points (group 3); 2 lesions (3.6%) had 4 and 5 points (group 4); and I lesion (1.8%) had 6 points (group 5). Ten lesions (of six in groups I and 2, one in group 3, three in groups 4 and 5) were histopathologically confirmed. Out of 10 lesions, only 1 (1.8%) with 4 points in group 4 was diagnosed as invasive ductal carcinoma. Other lesions followed with mammography or MR imaging did not change. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive values of MR imaging in the determination of malignancy in BI-RADS category 3 lesions were calculated as 100, 96.4, 96.4, 33.3, and 100%, respectively. Conclusion: In the evaluation of BI-RADS category 3 lesions, dynamic MR imaging does not provide additional information with low positive predictive value similar to that of short interval mammography follow-up. (C) 2005 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:436 / 444
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
American College of Radiology, 1998, ILL BREAST IM REP DA
[2]   Classification of hypervascularized lesions in CE MR imaging of the breast [J].
Baum, F ;
Fischer, U ;
Vosshenrich, R ;
Grabbe, E .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2002, 12 (05) :1087-1092
[3]   Incidental enhancing lesions found on MR imaging of the breast [J].
Brown, J ;
Smith, RC ;
Lee, CH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2001, 176 (05) :1249-1254
[4]   Clustered breast microcalcifications: Evaluation by dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MRI [J].
Gilles, R ;
Meunier, M ;
Lucidarme, O ;
Zafrani, B ;
Guinebretiere, JM ;
Tardivon, AA ;
LeGal, M ;
Vanel, D ;
Neuenschwander, S ;
Arriagada, R .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1996, 20 (01) :9-14
[5]   Breast magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Harms, SE .
SEMINARS IN ULTRASOUND CT AND MRI, 1998, 19 (01) :104-120
[6]   Development, standardization, and testing of a lexicon for reporting contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging studies [J].
Ikeda, DM ;
Hylton, NM ;
Kinkel, K ;
Hochman, MG ;
Kuhl, CK ;
Kaiser, WA ;
Weinreb, JC ;
Smazal, SF ;
Degani, H ;
Viehweg, P ;
Barclay, J ;
Schnall, MD .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2001, 13 (06) :889-895
[7]   Detection of breast cancer with conventional mammography and contrast-enhanced MR imaging [J].
Kacl, GM ;
Liu, PF ;
Debatin, JF ;
Garzoli, E ;
Caduff, RE ;
Krestin, GP .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 1998, 8 (02) :194-200
[8]   Observer variability and applicability of BI-RADS terminology for breast MR imaging: Invasive carcinomas as focal masses [J].
Kim, SJ ;
Morris, EA ;
Liberman, L ;
Ballon, DJ ;
La Trenta, LR ;
Hadar, O ;
Abramson, A ;
Dershaw, DD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2001, 177 (03) :551-557
[9]   Dynamic breast MR imaging: Are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? [J].
Kuhl, CK ;
Mielcareck, P ;
Klaschik, S ;
Leutner, C ;
Wardelmann, E ;
Gieseke, J ;
Schild, HH .
RADIOLOGY, 1999, 211 (01) :101-110
[10]   MRI of breast tumors [J].
Kuhl, CK .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2000, 10 (01) :46-58