Transbasal versus endoscopic endonasal versus combined approaches for olfactory groove meningiomas: importance of approach selection

被引:39
作者
Liu, James K. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Silva, Nicole A. [1 ]
Sevak, Ilesha A. [1 ]
Eloy, Jean Anderson [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers New Jersey Med Sch, Dept Neurol Surg, Newark, NJ USA
[2] Rutgers New Jersey Med Sch, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Newark, NJ USA
[3] Rutgers New Jersey Med Sch, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Newark, NJ USA
[4] Rutgers New Jersey Med Sch, Neurol Inst New Jersey, Ctr Skull Base & Pituitary Surg, Newark, NJ USA
关键词
olfactory groove meningiomas; endoscopic endonasal approach; transbasal approach; combined approach; skull base meningiomas; endoscopic skull base surgery; anterior skull base; ANTERIOR CRANIAL BASE; SURGICAL-TREATMENT; PTERIONAL APPROACH; RESECTION; RECURRENCE; MANAGEMENT; SINONASAL; DEFECTS; SERIES;
D O I
10.3171/2018.1.FOCUS17722
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE There has been much debate regarding the optimal surgical approach for resecting olfactory groove meningiomas (OGMs). In this paper, the authors analyzed the factors involved in approach selection and reviewed the surgical outcomes in a series of OGMs. METHODS A retrospective review of 28 consecutive OGMs from a prospective database was conducted. Each tumor was treated via one of 3 approaches: transbasal approach (n = 15), pure endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA; n = 5), and combined (endoscope-assisted) transbasal-EEA (n = 8). RESULTS The mean tumor volume was greatest in the transbasal (92.02 cm(3)) and combined (101.15 cm(3)) groups. Both groups had significant lateral dural extension over the orbits (transbasal 73.3%, p < 0.001; combined 100%), while the transbasal group had the most cerebral edema (73.3%, p < 0.001) and vascular involvement (66.7%, p < 0.001), and the least presence of a cortical cuff (33.3%, p = 0.019). All tumors in the combined group were recurrent tumors that invaded into the sinonasal cavity. The purely EEA group had the smallest mean tumor volume (33.33 cm(3)), all with a cortical cuff and no lateral dural extension. Gross-total resection was achieved in 80% of transbasal, 100% of EEA, and 62.5% of combined cases. Near-total resection (> 95%) was achieved in 20% of transbasal and 37.5% of combined cases, all due to tumor adherence to the critical neurovascular structures. The rate of CSF leakage was 0% in the transbasal and combined groups, and there was 1 leak in the EEA group (20%), resulting in an overall CSF leakage rate of 3.6%. Olfaction was preserved in 66.7% in the transbasal group. There was no significant difference in length of stay or 30-day readmission rate between the 3 groups. The mean modified Rankin Scale score was 0.79 after the transbasal approach, 2.0 after EEA, and 2.4 after the combined approach (p = 0.0604). The mean follow-up was 14.5 months (range 1-76 months). CONCLUSIONS The transbasal approach provided the best clinical outcomes with the lowest rate of complications for large tumors (> 40 mm) and for smaller tumors (< 40 mm) with intact olfaction. The role of EEA appears to be limited to smaller, appropriately selected tumors in which olfaction is already absent. EEA also plays an important adjunctive role when combined with the transbasal approach for recurrent OGMs invading the sinonasal cavity. Careful patient selection using an individualized, tailored strategy is important to optimize surgical outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [21] Preferences and Utilities for Health States after Treatment of Olfactory Groove Meningioma: Endoscopic versus Open
    Yao, Christopher M.
    Kahane, Alyssa
    Monteiro, Eric
    Gentili, Fred
    Zadeh, Gelareh
    de Almeida, John R.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY PART B-SKULL BASE, 2017, 78 (04) : 315 - 323
  • [22] Endoscopic endonasal versus transcranial approach to tuberculum sellae and planum sphenoidale meningiomas in a similar cohort of patients
    Bander, Evan D.
    Singh, Harminder
    Ogilvie, Colin B.
    Cusic, Ryan C.
    Pisapia, David J.
    Tsiouris, Apostolos John
    Anand, Vijay K.
    Schwartz, Theodore H.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 128 (01) : 40 - 48
  • [23] Septal transposition: a novel technique for preservation of the nasal septum during endoscopic endonasal resection of olfactory groove meningiomas
    Rosen, Marc R.
    Rabinowitz, Mindy R.
    Farrell, Christopher J.
    Schaberg, Madeleine R.
    Evans, James J.
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2014, 37 (04)
  • [24] Endoscopic endonasal approaches for the management of skull base meningiomas: selection criteria and clinical outcomes
    Todeschini, Alexandre B.
    Otto, Bradley A.
    Carrau, Ricardo L.
    Prevedello, Daniel M.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 62 (06) : 617 - 626
  • [25] Endoscopic Endonasal Approach to Ventral Posterior Fossa Meningiomas: From Case Selection to Surgical Management
    Beer-Furlan, Andre
    Vellutini, Eduardo A. S.
    Balsalobre, Leonardo
    Stamm, Aldo C.
    NEUROSURGERY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2015, 26 (03) : 413 - +
  • [26] Results of Transcranial Resection of Olfactory Groove Meningiomas in Relation to Imaging-Based Case Selection Criteria for the Endoscopic Approach
    Patel, Krunal
    Kolias, Angelos G.
    Santarius, Thomas
    Mannion, Richard J.
    Kirollos, Ramez W.
    OPERATIVE NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 16 (05) : 539 - 547
  • [27] Endoscopic Endonasal versus Open Transcranial Resection of Anterior Midline Skull Base Meningiomas
    Komotar, Ricardo J.
    Starke, Robert M.
    Raper, Daniel M. S.
    Anand, Vijay K.
    Schwartz, Theodore H.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2012, 77 (5-6) : 713 - 724
  • [28] Comparison of Three Surgical Approaches for Frontobasal Meningiomas: Purely Endoscopic Endonasal, Purely Microscopic Bifrontal Transcranial, and Combined Endoscopic and Microscopic Supraorbital Transciliary Approaches
    Kahilogullari, Gokmen
    Baykara, Yigit
    Eroglu, Umit
    Guler, Tugba Morali
    Beton, Suha
    Comert, Ayhan
    Meco, Cem
    Caglar, Sukru
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2021, 32 (03) : 844 - 850
  • [29] Endoscopic endonasal versus open approach for craniopharyngioma treatment: a systematic review of clinical characteristics
    Jung, Geena
    Cohen, Joshua M.
    Oriko, David
    Buckner-Wolfson, Emery
    Kim, Timothy
    Liriano, Genesis
    Kobets, Andrew J.
    CHILDS NERVOUS SYSTEM, 2025, 41 (01)
  • [30] In-Hospital Cost Comparison for Open Versus Endoscopic Endonasal Approach for Meningioma Resection
    Parasher, Arjun K.
    Lerner, David K.
    Miranda, Stephen P.
    Douglas, Jennifer E.
    Glicksman, Jordan T.
    Alexander, Tyler
    Lin, Theodore
    Ebesutani, Darren
    Kohanski, Michael
    Lee, John Y. K.
    Storm, Phillip B.
    O'Malley Jr, Bert W.
    Yoshor, Daniel
    Palmer, James N.
    Grady, M. Sean
    Adappa, Nithin D.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY & ALLERGY, 2023, 37 (03) : 324 - 329