Transbasal versus endoscopic endonasal versus combined approaches for olfactory groove meningiomas: importance of approach selection

被引:41
作者
Liu, James K. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Silva, Nicole A. [1 ]
Sevak, Ilesha A. [1 ]
Eloy, Jean Anderson [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers New Jersey Med Sch, Dept Neurol Surg, Newark, NJ USA
[2] Rutgers New Jersey Med Sch, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Newark, NJ USA
[3] Rutgers New Jersey Med Sch, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Newark, NJ USA
[4] Rutgers New Jersey Med Sch, Neurol Inst New Jersey, Ctr Skull Base & Pituitary Surg, Newark, NJ USA
关键词
olfactory groove meningiomas; endoscopic endonasal approach; transbasal approach; combined approach; skull base meningiomas; endoscopic skull base surgery; anterior skull base; ANTERIOR CRANIAL BASE; SURGICAL-TREATMENT; PTERIONAL APPROACH; RESECTION; RECURRENCE; MANAGEMENT; SINONASAL; DEFECTS; SERIES;
D O I
10.3171/2018.1.FOCUS17722
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE There has been much debate regarding the optimal surgical approach for resecting olfactory groove meningiomas (OGMs). In this paper, the authors analyzed the factors involved in approach selection and reviewed the surgical outcomes in a series of OGMs. METHODS A retrospective review of 28 consecutive OGMs from a prospective database was conducted. Each tumor was treated via one of 3 approaches: transbasal approach (n = 15), pure endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA; n = 5), and combined (endoscope-assisted) transbasal-EEA (n = 8). RESULTS The mean tumor volume was greatest in the transbasal (92.02 cm(3)) and combined (101.15 cm(3)) groups. Both groups had significant lateral dural extension over the orbits (transbasal 73.3%, p < 0.001; combined 100%), while the transbasal group had the most cerebral edema (73.3%, p < 0.001) and vascular involvement (66.7%, p < 0.001), and the least presence of a cortical cuff (33.3%, p = 0.019). All tumors in the combined group were recurrent tumors that invaded into the sinonasal cavity. The purely EEA group had the smallest mean tumor volume (33.33 cm(3)), all with a cortical cuff and no lateral dural extension. Gross-total resection was achieved in 80% of transbasal, 100% of EEA, and 62.5% of combined cases. Near-total resection (> 95%) was achieved in 20% of transbasal and 37.5% of combined cases, all due to tumor adherence to the critical neurovascular structures. The rate of CSF leakage was 0% in the transbasal and combined groups, and there was 1 leak in the EEA group (20%), resulting in an overall CSF leakage rate of 3.6%. Olfaction was preserved in 66.7% in the transbasal group. There was no significant difference in length of stay or 30-day readmission rate between the 3 groups. The mean modified Rankin Scale score was 0.79 after the transbasal approach, 2.0 after EEA, and 2.4 after the combined approach (p = 0.0604). The mean follow-up was 14.5 months (range 1-76 months). CONCLUSIONS The transbasal approach provided the best clinical outcomes with the lowest rate of complications for large tumors (> 40 mm) and for smaller tumors (< 40 mm) with intact olfaction. The role of EEA appears to be limited to smaller, appropriately selected tumors in which olfaction is already absent. EEA also plays an important adjunctive role when combined with the transbasal approach for recurrent OGMs invading the sinonasal cavity. Careful patient selection using an individualized, tailored strategy is important to optimize surgical outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Endoscope-assisted endonasal versus supraorbital keyhole resection of olfactory groove meningiomas: comparison and combination of 2 minimally invasive approaches [J].
Banu, Matei A. ;
Mehta, Alpesh ;
Ottenhausen, Malte ;
Fraser, Justin F. ;
Patel, Kunal S. ;
Szentirmai, Oszkar ;
Anand, Vijay K. ;
Tsiouris, Apostolos J. ;
Schwartz, Theodore H. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2016, 124 (03) :605-620
[2]   Transfrontal-Sinus-Subcranial Approach to Olfactory Groove Meningiomas: Surgical Results and Clinical and Functional Outcome in a Consecutive Series of 21 Patients [J].
Barzaghi, Lina Raffaella ;
Spina, Alfio ;
Gagliardi, Filippo ;
Boari, Nicola ;
Mortini, Pietro .
WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 101 :315-324
[3]   Olfactory groove meningiomas: functional outcome in a series treated microsurgically [J].
Bassiouni, H. ;
Asgari, S. ;
Stolke, D. .
ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2007, 149 (02) :109-121
[4]   The Role of the Pterional Approach in the Surgical Treatment of Olfactory Groove Meningiomas: A 20-year Experience [J].
Bitter, Andrej D. ;
Stavrinou, Lampis C. ;
Ntoulias, Georgios ;
Petridis, Athanasios K. ;
Dukagjin, Morina ;
Scholz, Martin ;
Hassler, Werner .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY PART B-SKULL BASE, 2013, 74 (02) :97-102
[5]   INTEROBSERVER AGREEMENT FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF HANDICAP IN STROKE PATIENTS [J].
BLOCH, RF .
STROKE, 1988, 19 (11) :1448-1448
[6]   Comparison of endoscopic endonasal and bifrontal craniotomy approaches for olfactory groove meningiomas: A matched pair analysis of outcomes and frontal lobe changes on MRI [J].
de Almeida, John R. ;
Carvalho, Felipe ;
Guimaraes Filho, Francisco Vaz ;
Kiehl, Tim-Rasmus ;
Koutourousiou, Maria ;
Su, Shirley ;
Vescan, Allan D. ;
Witterick, Ian J. ;
Zadeh, Gelareh ;
Wang, Eric W. ;
Fernandez-Miranda, Juan C. ;
Gardner, Paul A. ;
Gentili, Fred ;
Snyderman, Carl H. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 22 (11) :1733-1741
[7]   Surgical treatment of anterior basal meningiomas [J].
DeMonte, F .
JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 1996, 29 (03) :239-248
[8]   Unilateral Tailored Fronto-Orbital Approach for Giant Olfactory Groove Meningiomas: Technical Nuances [J].
Downes, Angela E. ;
Freeman, Jacob L. ;
Ormond, D. Ryan ;
Lillehei, Kevin O. ;
Youssef, A. Samy .
WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2015, 84 (04) :1166-1173
[9]   Epilepsy surgery Introduction [J].
Eisenberg, Howard M. ;
Liu, Charles Y. ;
Sagher, Oren .
NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2013, 34 (06)
[10]   Management of Skull Base Defects After Surgical Resection of Sinonasal and Ventral Skull Base Malignancies [J].
Eloy, Jean Anderson ;
Marchiano, Emily ;
Vazquez, Alejandro ;
Pfisterer, Michael J. ;
Mady, Leila J. ;
Baredes, Soly ;
Liu, James K. .
OTOLARYNGOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2017, 50 (02) :397-+