Transbasal versus endoscopic endonasal versus combined approaches for olfactory groove meningiomas: importance of approach selection

被引:39
作者
Liu, James K. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Silva, Nicole A. [1 ]
Sevak, Ilesha A. [1 ]
Eloy, Jean Anderson [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers New Jersey Med Sch, Dept Neurol Surg, Newark, NJ USA
[2] Rutgers New Jersey Med Sch, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Newark, NJ USA
[3] Rutgers New Jersey Med Sch, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Newark, NJ USA
[4] Rutgers New Jersey Med Sch, Neurol Inst New Jersey, Ctr Skull Base & Pituitary Surg, Newark, NJ USA
关键词
olfactory groove meningiomas; endoscopic endonasal approach; transbasal approach; combined approach; skull base meningiomas; endoscopic skull base surgery; anterior skull base; ANTERIOR CRANIAL BASE; SURGICAL-TREATMENT; PTERIONAL APPROACH; RESECTION; RECURRENCE; MANAGEMENT; SINONASAL; DEFECTS; SERIES;
D O I
10.3171/2018.1.FOCUS17722
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE There has been much debate regarding the optimal surgical approach for resecting olfactory groove meningiomas (OGMs). In this paper, the authors analyzed the factors involved in approach selection and reviewed the surgical outcomes in a series of OGMs. METHODS A retrospective review of 28 consecutive OGMs from a prospective database was conducted. Each tumor was treated via one of 3 approaches: transbasal approach (n = 15), pure endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA; n = 5), and combined (endoscope-assisted) transbasal-EEA (n = 8). RESULTS The mean tumor volume was greatest in the transbasal (92.02 cm(3)) and combined (101.15 cm(3)) groups. Both groups had significant lateral dural extension over the orbits (transbasal 73.3%, p < 0.001; combined 100%), while the transbasal group had the most cerebral edema (73.3%, p < 0.001) and vascular involvement (66.7%, p < 0.001), and the least presence of a cortical cuff (33.3%, p = 0.019). All tumors in the combined group were recurrent tumors that invaded into the sinonasal cavity. The purely EEA group had the smallest mean tumor volume (33.33 cm(3)), all with a cortical cuff and no lateral dural extension. Gross-total resection was achieved in 80% of transbasal, 100% of EEA, and 62.5% of combined cases. Near-total resection (> 95%) was achieved in 20% of transbasal and 37.5% of combined cases, all due to tumor adherence to the critical neurovascular structures. The rate of CSF leakage was 0% in the transbasal and combined groups, and there was 1 leak in the EEA group (20%), resulting in an overall CSF leakage rate of 3.6%. Olfaction was preserved in 66.7% in the transbasal group. There was no significant difference in length of stay or 30-day readmission rate between the 3 groups. The mean modified Rankin Scale score was 0.79 after the transbasal approach, 2.0 after EEA, and 2.4 after the combined approach (p = 0.0604). The mean follow-up was 14.5 months (range 1-76 months). CONCLUSIONS The transbasal approach provided the best clinical outcomes with the lowest rate of complications for large tumors (> 40 mm) and for smaller tumors (< 40 mm) with intact olfaction. The role of EEA appears to be limited to smaller, appropriately selected tumors in which olfaction is already absent. EEA also plays an important adjunctive role when combined with the transbasal approach for recurrent OGMs invading the sinonasal cavity. Careful patient selection using an individualized, tailored strategy is important to optimize surgical outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] The Evolution of Endoscopic Endonasal Approach for Olfactory Groove Meningiomas
    Champagne, Pierre-Olivier
    Zenonos, Georgios A.
    Wang, Eric W.
    Snyderman, Carl H.
    Gardner, Paul A.
    OPERATIVE NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 24 (02) : 121 - 130
  • [2] Endoscopic Endonasal Approach for Olfactory Groove Meningiomas: Operative Technique and Nuances
    Liu, James K.
    Hattar, Ellina
    Eloy, Jean Anderson
    NEUROSURGERY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2015, 26 (03) : 377 - +
  • [3] Endoscopic endonasal versus transcranial approach to resection of olfactory groove meningiomas: a systematic review
    Purohit, Aarti
    Jha, Roshani
    Khalafallah, Adham M.
    Price, Carrie
    Rowan, Nicholas R.
    Mukherjee, Debraj
    NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2020, 43 (06) : 1465 - 1471
  • [4] Supraorbital Versus Endoscopic Endonasal Approaches for Olfactory Groove Meningiomas: A Cost- Minimization Study
    Gandhoke, Gurpreet S.
    Pease, Matthew
    Smith, Kenneth J.
    Sekula, Raymond F., Jr.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 105 : 126 - 136
  • [5] Pure endoscopic expanded endonasal approach for olfactory groove and tuberculum sellae meningiomas
    Khan, Osaama H.
    Krischek, Boris
    Holliman, Damian
    Klironomos, George
    Kucharczyk, Walter
    Vescan, Allan
    Gentili, Fred
    Zadeh, Gelareh
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 21 (06) : 927 - 933
  • [6] Surgical Approaches to Resection of Olfactory Groove Meningiomas: Comparative Meta-analysis of the Endoscopic Endonasal versus Transcranial and Unilateral versus Bilateral Approaches
    Brown, Nolan J.
    Pennington, Zach
    Patel, Saarang
    Kuo, Cathleen
    Chakravarti, Sachiv
    Bui, Nicolas E.
    Gendreau, Julian
    Van Gompel, Jamie J.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY PART B-SKULL BASE, 2025, 86 (02) : 208 - 220
  • [7] Surgical nuances for removal of olfactory groove meningiomas using the endoscopic endonasal transcribriform approach
    Liu, James K.
    Christiano, Lana D.
    Patel, Smruti K.
    Tubbs, R. Shane
    Eloy, Jean Anderson
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2011, 30 (05)
  • [8] Endoscopic endonasal surgery for olfactory groove meningiomas: outcomes and limitations in 50 patients
    Koutourousiou, Maria
    Fernandez-Miranda, Juan C.
    Wang, Eric W.
    Snyderman, Carl H.
    Gardner, Paul A.
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2014, 37 (04)
  • [9] Comparison of endoscopic endonasal and bifrontal craniotomy approaches for olfactory groove meningiomas: A matched pair analysis of outcomes and frontal lobe changes on MRI
    de Almeida, John R.
    Carvalho, Felipe
    Guimaraes Filho, Francisco Vaz
    Kiehl, Tim-Rasmus
    Koutourousiou, Maria
    Su, Shirley
    Vescan, Allan D.
    Witterick, Ian J.
    Zadeh, Gelareh
    Wang, Eric W.
    Fernandez-Miranda, Juan C.
    Gardner, Paul A.
    Gentili, Fred
    Snyderman, Carl H.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 22 (11) : 1733 - 1741
  • [10] Olfactory groove meningiomas: supraorbital keyhole versus orbitofrontal, frontotemporal, or bifrontal approaches
    Bander, Evan D.
    Pandey, Abhinav
    Yan, Jenny
    Giantini-Larsen, Alexandra M.
    Schwartz, Alexandra
    Estin, Joshua
    Stieg, Phillip E.
    Ramakrishna, Rohan
    Tsiouris, Apostolos John
    Schwartz, Theodore H.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 140 (06) : 1568 - 1575