Antagonistic, overlapping and distinct responses to biotic stress in rice (Oryza sativa) and interactions with abiotic stress

被引:81
|
作者
Narsai, Reena [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Wang, Chuang [3 ,4 ]
Chen, Jie [5 ]
Wu, Jianli [5 ]
Shou, Huixia [3 ,4 ]
Whelan, James [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Australia, Ctr Computat Syst Biol, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
[2] Univ Western Australia, ARC Ctr Excellence Plant Energy Biol, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
[3] Zhejiang Univ, Joint Res Lab Genom & Nutri, Hangzhou 310058, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[4] Zhejiang Univ, Coll Life Sci, Hangzhou 310058, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[5] China Natl Rice Res Inst, Hangzhou 310006, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[6] Univ Western Australia, ARC Ctr Excellence Plant Energy Biol, Ctr Computat Syst Biol, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
来源
BMC GENOMICS | 2013年 / 14卷
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
PATHOGEN XANTHOMONAS ORYZAE; WRKY TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; DEFENSE-RELATED GENES; HEAT-SHOCK FACTORS; DISEASE RESISTANCE; BACTERIAL-BLIGHT; SALT TOLERANCE; BLAST FUNGUS; PV; ORYZAE; FUNCTIONAL-CHARACTERIZATION;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2164-14-93
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Background: Every year, substantial crop loss occurs globally, as a result of bacterial, fungal, parasite and viral infections in rice. Here, we present an in-depth investigation of the transcriptomic response to infection with the destructive bacterial pathogen Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae(Xoo) in both resistant and susceptible varieties of Oryza sativa. A comparative analysis to fungal, parasite and viral infection in rice is also presented. Results: Within 24 h of Xoo inoculation, significant reduction of cell wall components and induction of several signalling components, membrane bound receptor kinases and specific WRKY and NAC transcription factors was prominent, providing a framework for how the presence of this pathogen was signalled and response mounted. Extensive comparative analyses of various other pathogen responses, including in response to infection with another bacterium (Xoc), resistant and susceptible parasite infection, fungal, and viral infections, led to a proposed model for the rice biotic stress response. In this way, a conserved induction of calcium signalling functions, and specific WRKY and NAC transcription factors, was identified in response to all biotic stresses. Comparison of these responses to abiotic stress (cold, drought, salt, heat), enabled the identification of unique genes responsive only to bacterial infection, 240 genes responsive to both abiotic and biotic stress, and 135 genes responsive to biotic, but not abiotic stresses. Functional significance of a number of these genes, using genetic inactivation or over-expression, has revealed significant stress-associated phenotypes. While only a few antagonistic responses were observed between biotic and abiotic stresses, e.g. for a number of endochitinases and kinase encoding genes, some of these may be crucial in explaining greater pathogen infection and damage under abiotic stresses. Conclusions: The analyses presented here provides a global view of the responses to multiple stresses, further validates known resistance-associated genes, and highlights new potential target genes, some lineage specific to rice, that play important roles in response to stress, providing a roadmap to develop varieties of rice that are more resistant to multiple biotic and abiotic stresses, as encountered in nature.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Walking through crossroads-rice responses to heat and biotic stress interactions
    Kumar, Ritesh
    Bahuguna, Rajeev N.
    Tiwari, Manish
    Pal, Madan
    Chinnusamy, Viswanathan
    Sreeman, Sheshshayee
    Muthurajan, Raveendran
    Krishna Jagadish, S. V.
    THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 2022, 135 (11) : 4065 - 4081
  • [42] The role of rice microRNAs in abiotic stress responses
    Dong-Hoon Jeong
    Pamela J. Green
    Journal of Plant Biology, 2013, 56 : 187 - 197
  • [43] Salicylic Acid and Abiotic Stress Responses in Rice
    Pal, M.
    Kovacs, V.
    Szalai, G.
    Soos, V.
    Ma, X.
    Liu, H.
    Mei, H.
    Janda, T.
    JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY AND CROP SCIENCE, 2014, 200 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [44] The role of rice microRNAs in abiotic stress responses
    Jeong, Dong-Hoon
    Green, Pamela J.
    JOURNAL OF PLANT BIOLOGY, 2013, 56 (04) : 187 - 197
  • [45] Rice DREB1B promoter shows distinct stress-specific responses, and the overexpression of cDNA in tobacco confers improved abiotic and biotic stress tolerance
    Linga Reddy Gutha
    Arjula R. Reddy
    Plant Molecular Biology, 2008, 68 : 533 - 555
  • [46] Rice DREB1B promoter shows distinct stress-specific responses, and the overexpression of cDNA in tobacco confers improved abiotic and biotic stress tolerance
    Gutha, Linga Reddy
    Reddy, Arjula R.
    PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2008, 68 (06) : 533 - 555
  • [47] Biotic and abiotic stress responses of interspecific hybrid cherry rootstocks
    Lang, G
    Howell, W
    Ophardt, D
    Mink, G
    INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INTEGRATING CANOPY, ROOTSTOCKS AND ENVIRONMENTAL PHYSIOLOGY IN ORCHARD SYSTEMS, PROCEEDINGS - VOLS 1 AND 2, 1997, (451): : 217 - 224
  • [48] miRNAs and lncRNAs in tomato: Roles in biotic and abiotic stress responses
    Li, Qian
    Shen, Heng
    Yuan, Shoujuan
    Dai, Xigang
    Yang, Changxian
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2023, 13
  • [49] Plant RABs: Role in Development and in Abiotic and Biotic Stress Responses
    Tripathy, Manas K.
    Deswal, Renu
    Sopory, Sudhir K.
    CURRENT GENOMICS, 2021, 22 (01) : 26 - 40
  • [50] Biotic and abiotic stress - physiological responses in agri-environment
    Jolankai, Marton
    CEREAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2009, 37 : 1 - 1