A quasi-randomized group trial of a brief alcohol intervention on risky single occasion drinking among secondary school students

被引:27
作者
Gmel, Gerhard [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Venzin, Vigeli [5 ]
Marmet, Katrin [5 ]
Danko, George [6 ]
Labhart, Florian [1 ]
机构
[1] Addict Switzerland, Res Dept, CH-1001 Lausanne, Switzerland
[2] Univ Lausanne Hosp, Alcohol Treatment Ctr, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
[3] Ctr Addict & Mental Hlth, Toronto, ON M5S 2S1, Canada
[4] Univ W New England, Bristol BS16 1QY, Avon, England
[5] Cantonal Off Secondary Educ Zurich, CH-8090 Zurich, Switzerland
[6] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Psychiat, San Diego, CA 92093 USA
关键词
Group randomized trial; Brief alcohol intervention; Risky single occasion drinking; Secondary school students; ADOLESCENT SUBSTANCE-ABUSE; MOTIVATIONAL-ENHANCEMENT; PRIMARY-CARE; CONSUMPTION; OUTCOMES; DRINKERS;
D O I
10.1007/s00038-012-0419-0
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
To show the effectiveness of a brief group alcohol intervention. Aims of the intervention were to reduce the frequency of heavy drinking occasions, maximum number of drinks on an occasion and overall weekly consumption. A cluster quasi-randomized control trial (intervention n = 338; control n = 330) among 16- to 18-year-old secondary school students in the Swiss Canton of Zurich. Groups homogeneous for heavy drinking occasions (5+/4+ drinks for men/women) consisted of those having medium risk (3-4) or high risk (5+) occasions in the past 30 days. Groups of 8-10 individuals received two 45-min sessions based on motivational interviewing techniques. Borderline significant beneficial effects (p < 0.10) on heavy drinking occasions and alcohol volume were found 6 months later for the medium-risk group only, but not for the high-risk group. None of the effects remained significant after Bonferroni corrections. Group intervention was ineffective for all at-risk users. The heaviest drinkers may need more intensive treatment. Alternative explanations were iatrogenic effects among the heaviest drinkers, assessment reactivity, or reduction of social desirability bias at follow-up through peer feedback.
引用
收藏
页码:935 / 944
页数:10
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2008, PASS USERS GUIDE
  • [2] Babor T., 2010, ALCOHOL NO ORDINARY, V2nd
  • [3] Babor T.F., 2001, BRIEF INTERVENTION H
  • [4] Bachmann K, 1999, LUST ODER LAST BERUF
  • [5] Reduction of alcohol consumption by brief alcohol intervention in primary care - Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bertholet, N
    Daeppen, JB
    Wietlisbach, V
    Fleming, M
    Burnand, B
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2005, 165 (09) : 986 - 995
  • [6] Sample size in guidelines trials
    Bland, JM
    [J]. FAMILY PRACTICE, 2000, 17 : S17 - S20
  • [7] Group intervention for coexisting psychosis and substance use disorders in rural Australia: outcomes over 3 years
    Bradley, Adrian C.
    Baker, Amanda
    Lewin, Terry J.
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2007, 41 (06) : 501 - 508
  • [8] Developing a Group Motivational Interviewing Intervention for First-Time Adolescent Offenders At-Risk for an Alcohol or Drug Use Disorder
    D'Amico, Elizabeth J.
    Osilla, Karen Chan
    Hunter, Sarah B.
    [J]. ALCOHOLISM TREATMENT QUARTERLY, 2010, 28 (04) : 417 - 436
  • [9] Social desirability biases in self-reported alcohol consumption and harms
    Davis, Christopher G.
    Thake, Jennifer
    Vilhena, Natalie
    [J]. ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 2010, 35 (04) : 302 - 311
  • [10] Pragmatism in modeling peer influence: Dynamics, outcomes, and change processes
    Dishion, TJ
    Bullock, BM
    Granic, I
    [J]. DEVELOPMENT AND PSYCHOPATHOLOGY, 2002, 14 (04) : 969 - 981