Community asset participation and social medicine increases qualities of life

被引:22
作者
Munford, Luke A. [1 ]
Panagioti, Maria [2 ]
Bower, Peter [3 ]
Skevington, Suzanne M. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Manchester Acad Hlth Sci Ctr, Ctr Primary Care & Hlth Serv Res, Hlth Org Policy & Econ Res Team, Manchester, Lancs, England
[2] Univ Manchester, Manchester Acad Hlth Sci Ctr, NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translat R, NIHR Sch Primary Care Res, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
[3] Univ Manchester, Manchester Acad Hlth Sci Ctr, Ctr Primary Care, NIHR Sch Primary Care Res,Div Populat Hlth Hlth S, Manchester, Lancs, England
[4] Univ Manchester, Manchester Ctr Hlth Psychol, Div Psychol Sci & Mental Hlth, Coupland 1 Bldg,Oxford Rd, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Community assets; Social participation; Quality of life; WHOQOL-BREF; Elderly; Social cohesion; WORLD-HEALTH-ORGANIZATION; OF-LIFE; ASSESSMENT WHOQOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113149
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Rationale: Social prescribing to community assets, like social groups, is a current policy goal. As aging adults lead longer, healthier lives, the effects of participating in community assets raises questions about whether subjective quality of life (QoL) improves during participation and on what dimensions. Objective: The study's goal was to examine the effectiveness of community assets at improving QoL among older people living in the community. Method: Examining longitudinal survey data which tracked health and wellbeing in older adults living in Salford, UK over 12 months, we first used regressions on community assets to compare the World Health Organization's QoL Assessment (WHOQOL-BREF) domains at baseline for those who already participated in community assets (54%) and with non-participants (46%). Second, we used propensity score matching to compare QoL in an 'uptake' group (no initial participation but who participated at 12 months), to those who never participated, and to a 'cessation' group who participated initially, but ceased within one year, to those who always participated. Results: Group comparisons confirmed that participants reported significantly higher QoL on all domains - environmental, psychological, physical, and social QoL - and on 16 predicted facets. After affirming group matching reliability, the strongest results were for the uptake group, with significant improvements in all domains, and in 18 facets. All QoL domains decreased in the cessation group, but overall, the effect was weaker. As predicted from the context, QoL relating to 'opportunities for recreation and leisure' showed the greatest effect. Furthermore, QoL increased with uptake, and decreased with cessation. Conclusion: Policies to improve QoL in later life should be designed not just to promote community assets, but also maintain participation once initiated.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2011, ASSET BASED APPROACH
[2]  
Bower P., 2018, Health Serv Deliv Res, V6, P1, DOI [10.3310/hsdr06310, DOI 10.3310/HSDR06310]
[3]   Non-clinical community interventions: a systematised review of social prescribing schemes [J].
Chatterjee, Helen J. ;
Camic, Paul M. ;
Lockyer, Bridget ;
Thomson, Linda J. M. .
ARTS & HEALTH, 2018, 10 (02) :97-123
[4]   Valuing the ICECAP capability index for older people [J].
Coast, Joanna ;
Flynn, Terry N. ;
Natarajan, Lucy ;
Sproston, Kerry ;
Lewis, Jane ;
Louviere, Jordan J. ;
Peters, Tim J. .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2008, 67 (05) :874-882
[5]   A comparison of the EQ-5D-3L and ICECAP-O in an older post-acute patient population relative to the general population [J].
Couzner L. ;
Crotty M. ;
Norman R. ;
Ratcliffe J. .
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 2013, 11 (4) :415-425
[6]   Older adults' quality of life - Exploring the role of the built environment and social cohesion in community-dwelling seniors on low income [J].
Engel, L. ;
Chudyk, A. M. ;
Ashe, M. C. ;
McKay, H. A. ;
Whitehurst, D. G. T. ;
Bryan, S. .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2016, 164 :1-11
[7]  
Euro-QoL group, 2015, EQ 5D 5L USER GUIDE
[8]   Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment [J].
Harper, A ;
Power, M .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 1998, 28 (03) :551-558
[9]  
King's Fund, 2017, REIM COMM SERV MAK M
[10]   THE WORLD-HEALTH-ORGANIZATION QUALITY-OF-LIFE ASSESSMENT (WHOQOL) - POSITION PAPER FROM THE WORLD-HEALTH-ORGANIZATION [J].
KUYKEN, W ;
ORLEY, J ;
POWER, M ;
HERRMAN, H ;
SCHOFIELD, H ;
MURPHY, B ;
METELKO, Z ;
SZABO, S ;
PIBERNIKOKANOVIC, M ;
QUEMADA, N ;
CARIA, A ;
RAJKUMAR, S ;
KUMAR, S ;
SAXENA, S ;
BARON, D ;
AMIR, M ;
TAZAKI, M ;
NOJI, A ;
VANHECK, G ;
DEVRIES, J ;
SUCRE, JA ;
PICARDAMI, L ;
KABANOV, M ;
LOMACHENKOV, A ;
BURKOVSKY, G ;
CARRASCO, RL ;
BODHARAMIK, Y ;
MEESAPYA, K ;
SKEVINGTON, S ;
PATRICK, D ;
MARTIN, M ;
WILD, D ;
ACUDA, W ;
MUTAMBIRWA, J ;
AARONSON, NK ;
BECH, P ;
BULLINGER, M ;
CHEN, HN ;
FOXRUSHBY, J ;
MOINPOUR, C ;
ROSSER, R ;
BUESCHING, D ;
BUCQUET, D ;
CHAMBERS, LW ;
JAMBON, B ;
JENKINS, CD ;
DELEO, D ;
FALLOWFIELD, L ;
GERIN, P ;
GRAHAM, P .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1995, 41 (10) :1403-1409