Equity in Regional Public Transit Finance: Tradeoffs between Social and Geographic Equity

被引:14
作者
Iseki, Hiroyuki [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Natl Ctr Smart Growth Res & Educ, Sch Architecture Planning & Preservat, Urban Studies & Planning, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
关键词
Public transit finance; Transit equity; Local transit finance; Regional transit planning; TRANSPORTATION FINANCE;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000328
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This study examines equity in public transit finance for transit service among nine cities and townships that formed a consortium for regional transit service in Toledo, Ohio, in 2006. The main data for the analysisoperating and financial data of fixed-route bus and demand-responsive services and data on local property tax receiptswere obtained from the transit agency, as well as the National Transit Database. The analysis results show that the distribution of costs and benefits of transit subsidy was progressive among sociodemographic groups while it exhibited geographic inequity, and suggest that it is inevitable to find a conflict between social equity and geographic equity in public transit finance within urban areas where transit dependents remain in inner cities while regional transit funding has to rely more on taxes provided by affluent suburban communities. The shrinking role of federal and state governments in public transit assistance exacerbated this conflicting situation by reducing funding that could be used to enhance transit service in each community.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Altsushuler A., 1979, URBAN TRANSPORTATION
  • [2] Considering the environment in transportation planning: Review of emerging paradigms and practice in the United States
    Amekudzi, A
    Meyer, MD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-ASCE, 2006, 132 (01): : 42 - 52
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2010, THE BLADE
  • [4] Bates J. W., 1982, TRANSPORT RES REC, V857, P60
  • [5] Black Alan., 1995, URBAN MASS TRANSPORT
  • [6] Bollens SA, 2002, HOUS POLICY DEBATE, V13, P631
  • [7] Bradley J., 1999, ATLANTIC, P26
  • [8] FLAT VERSUS DIFFERENTIATED TRANSIT PRICING - WHATS A FAIR FARE
    CERVERO, R
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION, 1981, 10 (03) : 211 - 232
  • [9] Cervero R., 1981, Transportation Research Record, V799, P7
  • [10] Ferreri M. G., 1979, PUBLIC TRANSPORTATIO