ARAIM Continuity and Availability Assertions, Assumptions, and Evaluation Methods

被引:11
作者
Joerger, Mathieu [1 ]
Zhai, Yawei [2 ,3 ]
Martini, Ilaria
Blanch, Juan [4 ]
Pervan, Boris [2 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
[2] Illinois Tech, Chicago, IL USA
[3] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Stanford Univ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2020 INTERNATIONAL TECHNICAL MEETING OF THE INSTITUTE OF NAVIGATION | 2020年
关键词
D O I
10.33012/2020.17152
中图分类号
TH7 [仪器、仪表];
学科分类号
0804 ; 080401 ; 081102 ;
摘要
In this paper, we describe assumptions and assertions needed to account for continuity and availability risks in Advance Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring (ARAIM). We identify key differences with current RAIM-based operations, including the potential of ARAIM to not require systematic pre-flight availability screening. The assumptions and assertions provide a rationale on why fault exclusion is needed in horizontal-ARAIM (H-ARAIM), but is not needed in vertical ARAIM (V-ARAIM). We implement existing methods and design new approaches to predict continuity and availability in the presence of satellite faults and outages, and we analyze performance sensitivity to risk requirements and measurement models.
引用
收藏
页码:404 / 420
页数:17
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1991, RTCADO208
[2]  
Blanch J., 2019, ARAIM WG C M EL SEG
[3]  
Blanch J., 2017, WORK GROUP C MARCH
[4]  
EUUS Cooperation on Satellite Navigation WG CARAIM Technical Subgroup., 2012, EU US COOPERATION SA
[5]  
FAA, 2011, SYSTEM SAFETY ANA 23
[6]  
FAA NSTB /WAAS T&E Team, 2019, 104 FAA NSTBWAAS TE
[7]  
Grimes J., 2008, Global positioning system standard positioning service performance standard
[8]  
Gunning K., 2017, APPENDIX CONTI UNPUB
[9]  
International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), 2009, ANN 10 AER TEL, V1
[10]  
Joerger M., 2019, ARAIM WG C M EL SEG