Risk and Protective Factors for Probation Success Among Youth Offenders in Singapore

被引:21
作者
Li, Dongdong [1 ]
Chu, Chi Meng [1 ]
Xu, Xuexin [1 ]
Zeng, Gerald [1 ]
Ruby, Kala [2 ]
机构
[1] Minist Social & Family Dev, Ctr Res Rehabil & Protect, 512 Thomson Rd,12-00 MSF Bldg, Singapore 298136, Singapore
[2] Minist Social & Family Dev, Probat & Community Rehabil Serv, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
youth offender; protective factor; risk factor; YLS; CMI; SAPROF; PREDICTIVE-VALIDITY; PROBLEM BEHAVIOR; VIOLENCE; YLS/CMI; RECIDIVISM; FAMILY; FRAMEWORK; UTILITY; CRIME; LEVEL;
D O I
10.1177/1541204018778887
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
The study examined the risk and protective factors for the successful completion of probation orders among youth offenders in Singapore. Specifically, we proposed a typology whereby a predictor can be labeled as a promotive factor, hazard factor, or mixed factor in a direct relationship; or a booster factor or buffering factor in an interactive relationship. This study included 701 youth offenders. Retrospective case file coding was conducted to score the Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory (YLS/CMI) and Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for Violence Risk-Youth Version (SAPROF-YV). Most SAPROF factors were shown to be mixed protective factors, whereas most YLS/CMI domains were either mixed risk factors or hazard factors. An absence of a supportive external pedagogical climate (PC) was the strongest mixed factor. For youth with high PC, significant booster factors included high levels of attitudes toward agreements and conditions, motivation for treatment, perseverance, and bonding to school/work, as well as low levels of risk in peer relations and education/employment. For youth with limited PC, buffering factors with the strongest effects include self-control, future orientation, and school/work. Implications for practice and future research were discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:194 / 213
页数:20
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
Andrews D.A., 2017, PSYCHOL CRIMINAL CON, V6th
[2]   The recent past and near future of risk and/or need assessment [J].
Andrews, DA ;
Bonta, J ;
Wormith, JS .
CRIME & DELINQUENCY, 2006, 52 (01) :7-27
[3]  
Aos S., 2011, Return on investment: Evidence-based options to improve statewide outcomes
[4]  
Borum R., 2006, Manual for the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY)
[5]  
Chan Y. H., 2004, SMJ Singapore Medical Journal, V45, P149
[6]   A Latent Class Analysis of Family Characteristics Linked to Youth Offending Outcomes [J].
Chng, Grace S. ;
Chu, Chi Meng ;
Zeng, Gerald ;
Li, Dongdong ;
Ting, Ming Hwa .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN CRIME AND DELINQUENCY, 2016, 53 (06) :765-787
[7]  
Chu CM, 2015, ROUTL FRONT CRIMINOL, V23, P140
[8]   Assessing Youth Offenders in a Non-Western Context: The Predictive Validity of the YLS/CMI Ratings [J].
Chu, Chi Meng ;
Lee, Yirong ;
Zeng, Gerald ;
Yim, Grace ;
Tan, Chen Yeh ;
Ang, Yaming ;
Chin, Shannon ;
Ruby, Kala .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2015, 27 (03) :1013-1021
[9]   THE UTILITY OF THE YLS/CMI-SV FOR ASSESSING YOUTH OFFENDERS IN SINGAPORE [J].
Chu, Chi Meng ;
Yu, Hui ;
Lee, Yirong ;
Zeng, Gerald .
CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND BEHAVIOR, 2014, 41 (12) :1437-1457
[10]   The Short- to Medium-Term Predictive Accuracy of Static and Dynamic Risk Assessment Measures in a Secure Forensic Hospital [J].
Chu, Chi Meng ;
Thomas, Stuart D. M. ;
Ogloff, James R. P. ;
Daffern, Michael .
ASSESSMENT, 2013, 20 (02) :230-241