Retrospective and reconsideration: The first 25 years of the Steinitz framework for landscape architecture education and environmental design

被引:3
作者
Hollstein, Leah M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cincinnati, Sch Planning, Coll Design Architecture Art & Planning, Cincinnati, OH USA
关键词
Landscape architecture; Design education; Steinitz framework; Geodesign; Decision-making; Environmental design disciplines; ALTERNATIVE FUTURES; PHYSICAL BASIS; CONSERVATION; SYSTEMS; MANAGEMENT; STRATEGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.02.020
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Carl Steinitz' "Framework for Theory" is a valuable heuristic for organizing environmental design processes. Originally designed for use in the discipline of landscape architecture, it has diffused into related environmental design disciplines; its most prominent current use is in the multidisciplinary approach of geodesign. The framework has been used for academic and professional purposes and modified multiple times since it was first published in 1990. The framework has proven especially robust in providing disciplinary focus, organizing multifaceted research and planning projects, bridging individual and collective design tensions, and parsing convoluted decision-making. This article revisits the use of frameworks in the environmental design disciplines, the framework's creation and initial publication, and considers its early positionings that, while not widely followed, offer promising disciplinary services. It further explores limitations and criticisms of the framework, contemplates its use for emerging disciplinary needs, and advocates for the framework's use in the environmental design disciplines.
引用
收藏
页码:56 / 66
页数:11
相关论文
共 65 条
[21]   Integrated landscape planning and remuneration of agri-environmental services Results of a case study in the Fuhrberg region of Germany [J].
Haaren, Christina V. ;
Bathke, Manfred .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2008, 89 (03) :209-221
[22]   Mapping in and out of "messes": An adaptive, participatory, and transdisciplinary approach to assessing cumulative environmental justice impacts [J].
Huang, Ganlin ;
London, Jonathan K. .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2016, 154 :57-67
[23]   Anticipating floodplain trajectories: a comparison of two alternative futures approaches [J].
Hulse, David ;
Branscomb, Allan ;
Enright, Chris ;
Bolte, John .
LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2009, 24 (08) :1067-1090
[24]  
Jorgensen LB, 2017, GROUNDED THEORY REV, V16, P10
[25]   Application of a scenario-based modeling system to evaluate the air quality impacts of future growth [J].
Kahyaoglu-Koracin, Juelide ;
Bassett, Scott D. ;
Mouat, David A. ;
Gertler, Alan W. .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 43 (05) :1021-1028
[26]   'Learning by doing': adaptive planning as a strategy to address uncertainty in planning [J].
Kato, Sadahisa ;
Ahern, Jack .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2008, 51 (04) :543-559
[27]   Integration and visualization of the ecological value of rural landscapes in maintaining the physical environment of Japan [J].
Kato, Y ;
Yokohari, M ;
Brown, RD .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 1997, 39 (01) :69-82
[28]  
Kirkwood N., 2001, Why Is There So Little Residential Redevelopment of Brownfields?
[29]  
Lawson B., 2006, How Designers Think: The Design Process Demystified
[30]  
Leitao AB, 2002, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V59, P65, DOI 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00005-1