Risk assessment and requirements for the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) in agriculture

被引:0
|
作者
Hinz, T [1 ]
Hornicke, E [1 ]
机构
[1] Bundesforsch Anstalt Landwirtschaft, Inst Technol & Biosyst Techn, FAL, D-38116 Braunschweig, Germany
来源
LANDBAUFORSCHUNG VOLKENRODE | 2001年 / 51卷 / 04期
关键词
risk assessment; personal protective equipment (PPE); performance requirement; test methods; plant protection products PPP (pesticides);
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Many working places in agriculture and horticulture affect farmers' health by various kinds of load, such as mechanical or heat stress, or exposure to airborne contaminants which may harm or irritate skin or breathing. This can be gases and particles, which form very complex bio-aerosols depending on the kind of source. One important source of airborne contaminants are pesticides which include possible risks. In all cases the possible risks have to be limited by reducing load or by using different types of PPE to protect the head, feet, whole body or respiration. This equipment must be tested and certified according the EU Directive 891686 EEC and CEN standard, as far as available. In other cases, national standards or guidelines may be used, as it is done in Germany with the definition of PPE to protect users of plant protection products (PPP). Risk assessment requires consideration of exposure data and of suitable protective measures. A particularity of the German model of risk assessment is to be seen in fixing limit values of penetration, e. g. 5 % concerning suits. A standard European testing procedure is currently under discussion in the framework of CEN work item WI 00162217. Concerning hand protection, gloves will be tested according to EN 374, which is under revision at the present time.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 205
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Hazardous Substances in personal Protective Equipment: How "healthy" PPE must be?
    Mattiuzzo, C.
    GEFAHRSTOFFE REINHALTUNG DER LUFT, 2016, 76 (05): : 191 - 193
  • [32] Acrylic window as physical barrier for Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) conservation
    Gan, Connie Cai Ru
    Tseng, Yu-Chi
    Lee, Kuan-I
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2020, 38 (07): : 1532 - 1534
  • [33] Smart Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for construction safety: A literature review
    Rasouli, Sina
    Alipouri, Yaghoub
    Chamanzad, Shahin
    SAFETY SCIENCE, 2024, 170
  • [35] Personal protective equipment (PPE) for high-level disinfection (HLD)
    不详
    AORN JOURNAL, 2018, 107 (01) : P15 - P15
  • [36] Personal protective equipment (PPE) usage in construction projects: A scientometric approach
    Ammad, Syed
    Alaloul, Wesam Salah
    Saad, Syed
    Qureshi, Abdul Hannan
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2021, 35
  • [37] Anti-fogging techniques as part of personal protective equipment (PPE)
    Ramamoorthy, Karthik Ganesh
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2020, 64 (12) : 1085 - +
  • [38] Physiological Hazard Assessment While Wielding Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Among Health Care Workers
    George, Jisa
    Verma, Ranjana
    Shafqat, Naseema
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (03)
  • [39] Cocoa Farmers' Compliance with Safety Precautions in Spraying Agrochemicals and Use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) in Cameroon
    Oyekale, Abayomi Samuel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 15 (02):
  • [40] Behavior Analysis of the Use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for Workers at PT. Maruki International Indonesia
    Alim, Andi
    Adam, Arlin
    Gala, Cynthia Claudia
    SOCIAL WORK IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 39 (05) : 458 - 467