Nitrogen leaching from douglas-fir forests after urea fertilization

被引:10
作者
Flint, Cynthia M. [1 ]
Harrison, Rob B. [1 ]
Strahm, Brian D. [1 ]
Adams, A. B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Coll Forest Resources, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2134/jeq2007.0367
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Leaching of nitrogen (N) after forest fertilization has the potential to pollute ground and surface water. The purpose of this study was to quantify N leaching through the primary rooting zone of N-limited Douglas-fir [Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco] forests the year after fertilization (224 kg N ha(-1) as urea) and to Calculate changes in the N pools of the overstory trees, understory vegetation, and soil. At six sites oil production forests in the Hood Canal watershed, Washington, tension lysimeters and estimates of the soil water flux were used to quantify, the mobilization and leaching of NO3-N, NH4-N, and dissolved organic nitrogen below the observed rooting depth. Soil and vegetation samples were collected before fertilization and 1 and 6 mo after fertilization. In the year after fertilization, the total leaching beyond the primary rooting zone in excess of control plots was 4.2 kg N ha(-1) (p = 0.03), which was equal to 2% of the total N applied. The peak NO3-N concentration that leached beyond the rooting zone of fertilized plots was 0.2 mg NO3-N L-1. Six months after fertilization, 26% of the applied N was accounted for in the overstory, and 27% was accounted for in the O+A horizon of the soil. The results of this study indicate that forest fertilization can lead to small N leaching fluxes out of the primary rooting zone during the first year after urea application.
引用
收藏
页码:1781 / 1788
页数:8
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   MINERALIZATION OF CARBON AND NITROGEN IN ACID FOREST SOIL TREATED WITH FAST AND SLOW-RELEASE NUTRIENTS [J].
AARNIO, T ;
MARTIKAINEN, PJ .
PLANT AND SOIL, 1994, 164 (02) :187-193
[2]   MINERALIZATION OF C AND N AND NITRIFICATION IN SCOTS PINE FOREST SOIL TREATED WITH NITROGEN FERTILIZERS CONTAINING DIFFERENT PROPORTIONS OF UREA AND ITS SLOW-RELEASING DERIVATIVE, UREAFORMALDEHYDE [J].
AARNIO, T ;
MARTIKAINEN, PJ .
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 1995, 27 (10) :1325-1331
[3]   Fate of urea and ureaformaldehyde nitrogen in a one-year laboratory incubation with Douglas-fir forest floor [J].
Aarnio, T ;
McCullough, K ;
Trofymow, JA .
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 1996, 28 (10-11) :1407-1415
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1994, HUMUS CHEM GENESIS C
[5]  
[Anonymous], 8 WEY CO
[6]   DISTRIBUTION AND INCREMENT OF BIOMASS IN ADJACENT YOUNG DOUGLAS-FIR STANDS WITH DIFFERENT EARLY GROWTH-RATES [J].
BANCALARI, MAE ;
PERRY, DA .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 1987, 17 (07) :722-730
[7]   Biotic versus hydrologic control over seasonal nitrate leaching in a floodplain forest [J].
Bechtold, JS ;
Edwards, RT ;
Naiman, RJ .
BIOGEOCHEMISTRY, 2003, 63 (01) :53-71
[8]  
Bisson P.A., 1992, FOREST FERTILIZATION, P179
[9]   Additional carbon sequestration following repeated urea fertilization of second-growth Douglas-fir stands in western Washington [J].
Canary, JD ;
Harrison, RB ;
Compton, JE ;
Chappell, HN .
FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2000, 138 (1-3) :225-232
[10]  
CLINE C, 1973, 742 WASH STAT DEP EC