Democracy and the Logic of Political Survival

被引:33
作者
Clarke, Kevin A. [1 ]
Stone, Randall W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rochester, Dept Polit Sci, Rochester, NY 14627 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1017/S0003055408080131
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Although democracy is a key concept in political science, debate continues over definitions and mechanisms. Bueno de Mesquita, Smith, Siverson, & Morrow (2003) make the important claim that most of democracy's effects are in fact due to something conceptually simpler and empirically easier to measure than democracy: the size of the minimum winning coalition that selects the leader. The argument is intuitively appealing and supported by extensive data analysis. Unfortunately, the statistical technique they use induces omitted variable bias into their results. They argue that they need to control for democracy, but their estimation procedure is equivalent to omitting democracy from their analysis. When we reestimate their regressions controlling for democracy, most of their important findings do not survive.
引用
收藏
页码:387 / 392
页数:6
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Almond G., 1963, CIVIC CULT
  • [2] [Anonymous], Forbes
  • [3] Carey JohnM., 1992, PRESIDENTS ASSEMBLIE
  • [4] Dahl RA., 1971, POLYARCHY PARTICIPAT
  • [5] Goldberger A. S., 1964, ECONOMETRIC THEORY
  • [6] Greene H.W., 2008, ECONOMETRIC ANAL, V6th
  • [7] Hicken A, 2005, AM J POLIT SCI, V49, P897
  • [8] ELIMINATING PROBLEMS CAUSED BY MULTICOLLINEARITY - A WARNING
    KENNEDY, PE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC EDUCATION, 1982, 13 (01) : 62 - 64
  • [9] Lijphart A., 1999, Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries
  • [10] Mesquita BB, 2003, LOGIC OF POLITICAL SURVIVAL, P1