Numerical simulation of turbulent air flow with dispersed droplets in cooling tower eliminators

被引:2
作者
Zamora, B. [1 ]
Kaiser, A. S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Cartagena, ETS Ingn Ind, Dept Ingn Term & Fluidos, Cartagena 30202, Spain
来源
REVISTA INTERNACIONAL DE METODOS NUMERICOS PARA CALCULO Y DISENO EN INGENIERIA | 2012年 / 28卷 / 03期
关键词
Drift eliminator; Collection efficiency; Turbulence model; CFD; CFD PREDICTION; MODEL; PERFORMANCE; DEPOSITION; CHANNELS; DRIFT;
D O I
10.1016/j.rimni.2012.03.008
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This work presents a numerical study on the turbulent flow of air with dispersed water droplets in separators of mechanical cooling towers. The averaged Navier-Stokes equations are discretised through a finite volume method, using the Fluent and Phoenics codes, and alternatively employing the turbulence models k-epsilon, k-omega and the Reynolds stress model, with low-Re version and wall enhanced treatment refinements. The results obtained are compared with numerical and experimental results taken from the literature. The degree of accuracy obtained with each of the considered models of turbulence is stated. The influence of considering whether or not the simulation of the turbulent dispersion of droplets is analyzed, as well as the effects of other relevant parameters on the collection efficiency and the coefficient of pressure drop. Focusing on four specific eliminators ('Belgian wave', 'H1-V', 'L-shaped' and 'Zig-zag'), the following ranges of parameters are outlined: 1 <= U-e <= 5 m/s for the entrance velocity, 2 <= D-p <= 50 mu m for the droplet diameter, 650 <= Re <= 8.500 for Reynolds number, and 0.05 <= P-i <= 5 for the inertial parameter. Results reached alternately with Fluent and Phoenics codes are compared. The best results correspond to the simulations performed with Fluent, using the SST k-omega turbulence model, with values of the dimensionless scaled distance to wall y(+) in the range 0.2 to 0.5. Finally, correlations ate presented to predict the conditions for maximum collection efficiency (100%), depending on the geometric parameter of removal efficiency of each of the separators, which is introduced in this work. (C) 2011 CIMNE (Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya). Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:148 / 160
页数:13
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], PHOENICS SUPPORT ENC
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, US GUID
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2003, TURBULENCE MODELING
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2006, GENTRA USER GUIDE PH
[5]   EFFECT OF DRIFT ELIMINATOR DESIGN ON COOLING-TOWER PERFORMANCE [J].
BECKER, BR ;
BURDICK, LF .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1992, 114 (04) :632-642
[6]   COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF CURRENT DESIGN EVAPORATIVE COOLING-TOWER DRIFT ELIMINATORS [J].
CHAN, J ;
GOLAY, MW .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1977, 11 (08) :775-781
[7]   DROPLET BEHAVIOR AND COLLECTION BY COUNTERFLOW COOLING-TOWER ELIMINATORS [J].
FOSTER, PM ;
WILLIAMS, MI ;
WINTER, RJ .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1974, 8 (04) :349-360
[8]   A numerical model for gas flow and droplet motion in wave-plate mist eliminators with drainage channels [J].
Galletti, Chiara ;
Brunazzi, Elisabetta ;
Tognotti, Leonardo .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2008, 63 (23) :5639-5652
[9]   Application of CFD to closed-wet cooling towers [J].
Gan, G ;
Riffat, SB ;
Shao, L ;
Doherty, P .
APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2001, 21 (01) :79-92
[10]   Numerical simulation of closed wet cooling towers for chilled ceiling systems [J].
Gan, G ;
Riffat, SB .
APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 1999, 19 (12) :1279-1296