An integrated multi criteria approach for landfill siting in a conflicting environmental, economical and socio-cultural area

被引:144
作者
Eskandari, Mahnaz [2 ]
Homaee, Mehdi [1 ]
Mahmodi, Shahla [3 ]
机构
[1] Tarbiat Modares Univ, Dept Soil Sci, Tehran, Iran
[2] Islamic Azad Univ, Sci & Res Branch, Dept Soil Sci, Tehran, Iran
[3] Univ Tehran, Fac Agr, Dept Soil Sci, Karaj, Iran
关键词
Landfill siting; Multi-criteria decision analysis; Municipal solid waste; MUNICIPAL SOLID-WASTE; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION-SYSTEMS; SITE SELECTION; GIS; LEACHATE; PHYTOREMEDIATION; METHODOLOGY; MODELS; PLANT; AHP;
D O I
10.1016/j.wasman.2012.03.014
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Landfill site selection is a complicated multi criteria land use planning that should convince all related stakeholders with different insights. This paper addresses an integrating approach for landfill siting based on conflicting opinions among environmental, economical and socio-cultural expertise. In order to gain optimized siting decision, the issue was investigated in different viewpoints. At first step based on opinion sampling and questionnaire results of 35 experts familiar with local situations, the national environmental legislations and international practices, 13 constraints and 15 factors were built in hierarchical structure. Factors divided into three environmental, economical and socio-cultural groups. In the next step, the GIS-database was developed based on the designated criteria. In the third stage, the criteria standardization and criteria weighting were accomplished. The relative importance weights of criteria and subcriteria were estimated, respectively, using analytical hierarchy process and rank ordering methods based on different experts opinions. Thereafter, by using simple additive weighting method, the suitability maps for landfill siting in Marvdasht, Iran, was evaluated in environmental, economical and socio-cultural visions. The importance of each group of criteria in its own vision was assigned to be higher than two other groups. In the fourth stage, the final suitability map was obtained after crossing three resulted maps in different visions and reported in five suitability classes for landfill construction. This map indicated that almost 1224 ha of the study area can be considered as best suitable class for landfill siting considering all visions. In the last stage, a comprehensive field visit was performed to verify the selected site obtained from the proposed model. This field inspection has confirmed the proposed integrating approach for the landfill siting. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1528 / 1538
页数:11
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [21] Waste management models and their application to sustainable waste management
    Morrissey, AJ
    Browne, J
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2004, 24 (03) : 297 - 308
  • [22] Selection of MSW landfill site for Konya, Turkey using GIS and multi-criteria evaluation
    Nas, Bilgehan
    Cay, Tayfun
    Iscan, Fatih
    Berktay, Ali
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2010, 160 (1-4) : 491 - 500
  • [23] Nazari A., 2011, ENV EARTH SCI, DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12665-011-1137-2
  • [24] Landfill site selection by using geographic information systems
    Sener, B
    Süzen, ML
    Doyuran, V
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY, 2006, 49 (03): : 376 - 388
  • [25] GIS-based approach for optimized siting of municipal solid waste landfill
    Sumathi, V. R.
    Natesan, Usha
    Sarkar, Chinmoy
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2008, 28 (11) : 2146 - 2160
  • [26] Sys C, 1991, LAND EVALUATION 2
  • [27] Multi-criteria GIS-based siting of an incineration plant for municipal solid waste
    Tavares, Gilberto
    Zsigraiova, Zdena
    Semiao, Viriato
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2011, 31 (9-10) : 1960 - 1972
  • [28] University of California Committee of Consultants, 1974, GUID INT WAT QUAL AG
  • [29] Landfill site selection using spatial information technologies and AHP: A case study in Beijing, China
    Wang Guiqin
    Qin Li
    Li Guoxuea
    Chen Lijun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2009, 90 (08) : 2414 - 2421