Charting unknown waters-On the role of surprise in flood risk assessment and management

被引:94
作者
Merz, B. [1 ,2 ]
Vorogushyn, S. [1 ]
Lall, U. [3 ,4 ]
Viglione, A. [5 ]
Bloeschl, G. [5 ]
机构
[1] GFZ German Res Ctr Geosci, Sect Hydrol 54, Potsdam, Germany
[2] Univ Potsdam, Inst Earth & Environm Sci, Potsdam, Germany
[3] Columbia Univ, Columbia Water Ctr, New York, NY USA
[4] Columbia Univ, Dept Earth & Environm Engn, New York, NY USA
[5] Vienna Univ Technol, Inst Hydraul Engn & Water Resources Management, A-1040 Vienna, Austria
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; CHOICE EXPERIMENTS; SOCIO-HYDROLOGY; CLIMATE; SYSTEM; ADAPTATION; INSURANCE; FREQUENCY; FRAMEWORK; EXTREME;
D O I
10.1002/2015WR017464
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Unexpected incidents, failures, and disasters are abundant in the history of flooding events. In this paper, we introduce the metaphors of terra incognita and terra maligna to illustrate unknown and wicked flood situations, respectively. We argue that surprise is a neglected element in flood risk assessment and management. Two sources of surprise are identified: (1) the complexity of flood risk systems, represented by nonlinearities, interdependencies, and nonstationarities and (2) cognitive biases in human perception and decision making. Flood risk assessment and management are particularly prone to cognitive biases due to the rarity and uniqueness of extremes, and the nature of human risk perception. We reflect on possible approaches to better understanding and reducing the potential for surprise and its adverse consequences which may be supported by conceptually charting maps that separate terra incognita from terra cognita, and terra maligna from terra benigna. We conclude that flood risk assessment and management should account for the potential for surprise and devastating consequences which will require a shift in thinking.
引用
收藏
页码:6399 / 6416
页数:18
相关论文
共 101 条
  • [1] Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: Choice experiments and contingent valuation
    Adamowicz, W
    Boxall, P
    Williams, M
    Louviere, J
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1998, 80 (01) : 64 - 75
  • [2] Aerts JCJH, 2008, ECOL SOC, V13
  • [3] Ahrens J., 2006, J CONTING CRISIS MAN, V14, P207, DOI [DOI 10.1111/J.1468-5973.2006.00497.X, DOI 10.1111/J.1468-5973.2006.00497]
  • [4] Allison H., 2006, Science and Policy in natural resource management
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2013, GLOB ASS REP DIS RIS
  • [6] [Anonymous], B HYDR SUBC B
  • [7] [Anonymous], 1986, Complexity, Language, and Life: Mathematical Approaches, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-70953-1_6
  • [8] A probabilistic modelling system for assessing flood risks
    Apel, H
    Thieken, AH
    Merz, B
    Blöschl, G
    [J]. NATURAL HAZARDS, 2006, 38 (1-2) : 79 - 100
  • [9] Flood risk assessment and associated uncertainty
    Apel, H
    Thieken, AH
    Merz, B
    Blöschl, G
    [J]. NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2004, 4 (02) : 295 - 308
  • [10] Using Attribute Importance Rankings Within Discrete Choice Experiments: An Application to Valuing Bread Attributes
    Balcombe, Kelvin
    Bitzios, Michail
    Fraser, Iain
    Haddock-Fraser, Janet
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 65 (02) : 446 - 462