Radical Prostatectomy Without Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection Is Widely Practiced in High-Risk Patients Despite Poorer Survival

被引:5
|
作者
Kodiyan, Joyson [1 ]
Guirguis, Adel [1 ]
Ashamalla, Hani [1 ]
机构
[1] NewYork Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, 506 6th St, Brooklyn, NY 11215 USA
关键词
Cancer; Pelvis; Prostate; Surgery; Urology; DISEASE PROGRESSION; CANCER; LYMPHADENECTOMY;
D O I
10.1016/j.clgc.2020.03.008
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The study investigated practice patterns and outcomes of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) in patients receiving radical prostatectomy using the National Cancer Data Base. Fifty-one percent of those with favorable risk disease did not receive PLND; 39.2% of those with unfavorable risk disease did not receive a PLND, and those who did not receive nodal dissection had significantly worse survival. Patients with unfavorable risk prostate cancer undergoing surgery should strongly be considered for PLND. Purpose: Radical prostatectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is the standard of care for unfavorable risk prostate cancer. We investigated dissection practice patterns and their impact on overall survival using a large national database. Patients and Methods: Men with prostate adenocarcinoma diagnosed between 2004 and 2013 were identified from the National Cancer Data Base. Disease was classified as either favorable or unfavorable on the basis of National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. Minimum follow-up was 4 years. All patients received riskappropriate surgery: prostatectomy with or without PLND. Prostatectomy alone and prostatectomy with PLND was propensity score matched within each risk cohort. Survival analysis included Kaplan-Meier statistics, Cox proportional hazards model, and multivariate logistic regression. Results: A total of 66,469 subjects met the inclusion criteria. Median (range) age was 63 (27-90) years. Median (range) follow-up was 59.53 (48-143.54) months. Within the cohort of patients with favorable risk disease, 51% did not undergo nodal dissection. Matched analysis demonstrated no difference in survival (P = .926). Within the cohort of patients with unfavorable risk disease, 39.2% did not receive nodal dissection. Matched analysis demonstrated that nodal dissection had superior survival (log-rank P = .002; hazard ratio - 0.624; 95% confidence interval, 0.466-0.835; P= .002). Greater odds of receiving nodal dissection included an open or robot-assisted approach compared to a laparoscopic approach, academic/research programs, and higher risk groups. Conclusion: Although PLND is associated with a significant survival benefit in men with unfavorable risk prostate cancer, nearly 40% of patients with unfavorable risk disease did not receive PLND. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:395 / +
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impact of Lymph Node Burden on Survival of High-risk Prostate Cancer Patients Following Radical Prostatectomy and Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection
    Moris, Lisa
    Van den Broeck, Thomas
    Tosco, Lorenzo
    Van Baelen, Anthony
    Gontero, Paolo
    Karnes, Robert Jeffrey
    Everaerts, Wouter
    Albersen, Maarten
    Bastian, Patrick J.
    Chlosta, Piotr
    Claessens, Frank
    Chun, Felix K.
    Graefen, Markus
    Gratzke, Christian
    Kneitz, Burkhard
    Marchioro, Giansilvio
    Salas, Rafael Sanchez
    Tombal, Bertrand
    Van Der Poel, Henk
    Walz, Jochen Christoph
    De Meerleer, Gert
    Bossi, Alberto
    Haustermans, Karin
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Van Poppel, Hendrik
    Spahn, Martin
    Briganti, Alberto
    Joniau, Steven
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2016, 3
  • [2] Clinical value of extended pelvic lymph node dissection in patients subjected to radical prostatectomy
    Dobruch, Jakub
    Piotrowicz, Sebastian
    Skrzypczyk, Michal
    Golabek, Tomasz
    Chlosta, Piotr
    Borowka, Andrzej
    VIDEOSURGERY AND OTHER MINIINVASIVE TECHNIQUES, 2014, 9 (01) : 64 - 70
  • [3] Lymph swelling after radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection
    Carlsson, Stefan
    Bottai, Matteo
    Lantz, Anna
    Bjartell, Anders
    Hugosson, Jonas
    Steineck, Gunnar
    Stranne, Johan
    Wiklund, Peter
    Haglind, Eva
    Akre, Olof
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 129 (06) : 695 - 698
  • [4] Should Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection be Performed With Radical Prostatectomy? No
    Cookson, Michael S.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (04): : 1284 - 1285
  • [5] Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection: a combined technique
    Jarzemski, Piotr
    Listopadzki, Slawomir
    Slupski, Piotr
    Jarzemski, Marcin
    Brzoszczyk, Bartosz
    Sosnowski, Roman
    VIDEOSURGERY AND OTHER MINIINVASIVE TECHNIQUES, 2020, 15 (01) : 192 - 198
  • [6] Significance of pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy
    Iwamura, Hiromichi
    Hatakeyama, Shingo
    Narita, Takuma
    Ozaki, Yusuke
    Konishi, Sakae
    Horiguchi, Hirotaka
    Kodama, Hirotake
    Kojima, Yuta
    Fujita, Naoki
    Okamoto, Teppei
    Tobisawa, Yuki
    Yoneyama, Tohru
    Yamamoto, Hayato
    Yoneyama, Takahiro
    Hashimoto, Yasuhiro
    Ohyama, Chikara
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [7] Determinants of Performing Radical Prostatectomy Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection and the Number of Lymph Nodes Removed in Elderly Men
    Hu, Jim C.
    Prasad, Sandip M.
    Gu, Xiangmei
    Williams, Stephen B.
    Lipsitz, Stuart R.
    Nguyen, Paul L.
    Choueiri, Toni K.
    Choi, Wesley W.
    D'Amico, Anthony V.
    UROLOGY, 2011, 77 (02) : 402 - 406
  • [8] Should Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection be Performed With Radical Prostatectomy? YES
    Studer, Urs E.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (04): : 1285 - 1287
  • [9] Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection at the Time of Radical Prostatectomy: Extended, of Course
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Barletta, Francesco
    Torsi, Francesco Mon
    Briganti, Alberto
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2022, 44 : 13 - 14
  • [10] Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection at the Time of Radical Prostatectomy: Extended? Of Course Not!
    Sooriakumaran, Prasanna
    Narain, Tushar A.
    Davda, Reena
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2022, 44 : 18 - 19