Differences in responses to repeated fear-relevant stimuli between Nagoya and White Leghorn chicks

被引:22
作者
Abe, Hideaki [1 ]
Nagao, Kenji
Nakamura, Akihiro
Inoue-Murayama, Miho [1 ]
机构
[1] Kyoto Univ, Wildlife Res Ctr, Sakyo Ku, Kyoto 6068203, Japan
关键词
Domestic chicken; Freezing response; Habituation; Innate fear; Tonic immobility; NEONATAL MATERNAL SEPARATION; TONIC IMMOBILITY DURATION; DOMESTIC CHICKS; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; FLUCTUATING ASYMMETRY; LYMPHOCYTE RATIO; LEARNED FEAR; STRESS; PECKING; FOWL;
D O I
10.1016/j.beproc.2013.07.004
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Freezing responses to fearful stimuli are crucial for survival among all animal species within a prey-predator system. Generally, the degree of fearfulness correlates with intensity, duration, and frequency of freezing behaviours in response to fear-relevant stimuli. The present study examines innate fear responses to human handling in 144 newly hatched chicks through a tonic immobility (TI) test. Two fear responses-freezing duration and number of TI inductions-were examined. Individual variations in innate fear were investigated in chicks 1-2 days post-hatching when the restraint procedure was successively repeated 3 times within each day. Chicks showed sensitivity to fearful stimuli and considerable inter-individual variation in freezing duration and number of attempts required to induce TI. Moreover, differences were observed between breeds; White Leghorn chicks showed relatively low fear levels with gradual increases in TI duration, whereas Nagoya chicks showed extended TI duration and habituation to fearful stimuli. Our results suggest that TI reactions among newly hatched chicks are an innately determined behaviour specific to a breed or strain of chicken. Further, fearful responses among newborn chicks are not simple, but complex behaviours that involve multiple factors, such as breed-specific contextual fear learning and habituation/sensitisation processes. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 99
页数:5
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Heritability and Genetic Correlations of Fear-Related Behaviour in Red Junglefowl-Possible Implications for Early Domestication [J].
Agnvall, Beatrix ;
Jongren, Markus ;
Strandberg, Erling ;
Jensen, Per .
PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (04)
[2]   Strain and age differences in behaviour, fear response and pecking tendency in laying hens [J].
Albentosa, MJ ;
Kjaer, JB ;
Nicol, CJ .
BRITISH POULTRY SCIENCE, 2003, 44 (03) :333-344
[3]   IMMOBILITY REACTIONS IN DOMESTIC FOWL (GALLUS-GALLUS) LESS THAN 7 DAYS OLD - RESOLUTION OF A PARADOX [J].
BRAUD, WG ;
GINSBURG, HJ .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1973, 21 (FEB) :104-108
[4]   Fearfulness in red junglefowl and domesticated White Leghorn chickens [J].
Campler, Magnus ;
Jongren, Markus ;
Jensen, Per .
BEHAVIOURAL PROCESSES, 2009, 81 (01) :39-43
[5]   Prelimbic cortical BDNF is required for memory of learned fear but not extinction or innate fear [J].
Choi, Dennis C. ;
Maguschak, Kimberly A. ;
Ye, Keqiang ;
Jang, Sung-Wuk ;
Myers, Karyn M. ;
Ressler, Kerry J. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2010, 107 (06) :2675-2680
[6]  
CRAIG JV, 1984, POULTRY SCI, V63, P1, DOI 10.3382/ps.0630001
[7]   Tonic immobility is a measure of boldness toward predators: an application of Bayesian structural equation modeling [J].
Edelaar, Pim ;
Serrano, David ;
Carrete, Martina ;
Blas, Julio ;
Potti, Jaime ;
Luis Tella, Jose .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 2012, 23 (03) :619-626
[8]   Individual differences in tonic immobility may reflect behavioural strategies [J].
Erhard, HW ;
Mendl, M ;
Christiansen, SB .
APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 1999, 64 (01) :31-46
[9]   Changes in tonic immobility and the GABA-benzodiazepine system in response to handling in the chick [J].
Fluck, E ;
Hogg, S ;
Jones, RB ;
Bourne, R ;
File, SE .
PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR, 1997, 58 (01) :269-274
[10]   A critical review of fear tests used on cattle, pigs, sheep, poultry and horses [J].
Forkman, B. ;
Boissy, A. ;
Meunier-Salauen, M. C. ;
Canali, E. ;
Jones, R. B. .
PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 2007, 92 (03) :340-374