Beyond control of variables: What needs to develop to achieve skilled scientific thinking?

被引:123
作者
Kuhn, Deanna [1 ]
Lordanou, Kalypso [1 ]
Pease, Maria [1 ]
Wirkala, Clarice [1 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Teachers Coll, Dept Human Dev, New York, NY 10027 USA
关键词
Scientific thinking; Causal reasoning; Multivariable prediction; Epistemological understanding; Argumentation;
D O I
10.1016/j.cogdev.2008.09.006
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
We identify three aspects of scientific thinking beyond the control-of-variables strategy that we claim are essential for students to master as a foundation for skilled scientific thinking. The first is strategic and involves the ability to coordinate effects of multiple causal influences on an outcome. file second is a mature understanding of the epistemological foundations of science, recognizing scientific knowledge as constructed by humans rattler than simply discovered in the world. The third is the ability to engage in skilled argumentation in the scientific domain, with an appreciation of argumentation as entailing the coordination of theory and evidence. We present new empirical data with respect to the first two of these competencies, supporting the Claim that they are not well developed by early adolescence and warrant attention and provision of effective kinds of scaffolding. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:435 / 451
页数:17
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
Andriessen J, 2006, RUTG INV SYMP EDUC S, P197
[2]  
[Anonymous], CONTRIBUTIONS INFORM
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1996, NAT SCI ED STAND
[4]   Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: designing for learning from the web with KIE [J].
Bell, P ;
Linn, MC .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2000, 22 (08) :797-817
[5]   Motivation and performance differences in students domain-specific epistemological belief profiles [J].
Buehl, Michelle M. ;
Alexander, Patricia A. .
AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2005, 42 (04) :697-726
[6]   Beliefs about schooled knowledge: Domain specific or domain general? [J].
Buehl, MM ;
Alexander, PA ;
Murphy, PK .
CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 27 (03) :415-449
[7]   A DEVELOPMENTAL-STUDY OF CONSUMER INFORMATION-PROCESSING STRATEGIES [J].
CAPON, N ;
KUHN, D .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1980, 7 (03) :225-233
[8]   On the distinction between false belief understanding and subscribing to an interpretive theory of mind [J].
Carpendale, JI ;
Chandler, MJ .
CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 1996, 67 (04) :1686-1706
[9]   Analytic frameworks for assessing dialogic argumentation in online learning environments [J].
Clark, Douglas B. ;
Sampson, Victor ;
Weinberger, Armin ;
Erkens, Gijsbert .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2007, 19 (03) :343-374
[10]   Direct instruction vs. discovery: The long view [J].
Dean, David, Jr. ;
Kuhn, Deanna .
SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2007, 91 (03) :384-397