Risk factors for unsafe events involving a motor vehicle for group riders (cyclists): A naturalistic case-crossover study

被引:10
作者
Fraser, Michelle L. [1 ]
Meuleners, Lynn B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Australia, Western Australian Ctr Rd Safety Res, Sch Populat & Global Hlth, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
关键词
Group riding; Cycling; Naturalistic study; Unsafe events; Road environment; CRASH CHARACTERISTICS; SAFETY; INFRASTRUCTURE; BICYCLISTS; FREQUENCY; ATTITUDES; INJURIES; IMPACT; MISS;
D O I
10.1016/j.aap.2020.105758
中图分类号
TB18 [人体工程学];
学科分类号
1201 ;
摘要
This study aimed to determine the risk factors associated with unsafe events involving a motor vehicle, that occurred while group riding (cycling) in Perth, Western Australia. Naturalistic video footage was collected from 52 group riders and unsafe events identified. A case-crossover study was used to compare the road infrastructure and group behavioural characteristics of 108 case sites where unsafe events occurred to 216 control sites where no unsafe events occurred. After controlling for potential confounding factors, round abouts increased the risk of an unsafe event compared to midblocks (odds ratio (OR): 3.63, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.57-8.42, p = 0.003), priority control intersections (OR: 4.36, 95% CI: 1.49-12.76, 0.007) and traffic signal intersections (OR: 5.57, 95% CI: 1.42-21.79, p = 0.014). Raised traffic islands (OR: 2.30, 95% CI: 1.41-3.78, p = 0.001), posted speed limits of >= 60 km per hour (OR: 2.45, 95% CI: 1.55-3.86, p < 0.001) and group rider traffic violations (OR: 2.51, 95% CI: 1.14-5.53, p = 0.022) also significantly increased the risk of an unsafe event. Riding two abreast in the traffic lane (OR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.32-0.76, p = 0.002) or having all riders in the bicycle lane (OR: 0.14, 95% CI: 0.04-0.51, p = 0.003), significantly reduced the risk of an unsafe event, compared to riding single file in the traffic lane. Simple road infrastructure treatments on popular group riding routes as well as education targeting both group riders and motorists, could reduce unsafe events and promote a safer, more inclusive shared road environment for group riders.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Adobe, 2015, AD PREM PRO CC VERS
[2]   Predictors of the frequency and subjective experience of cycling near misses: Findings from the first two years of the UK Near Miss Project [J].
Aldred, Rachel ;
Goodman, Anna .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2018, 110 :161-170
[3]   A Matter of Utility? Rationalising Cycling, Cycling Rationalities [J].
Aldred, Rachel .
MOBILITIES, 2015, 10 (05) :686-705
[4]  
Amy Gillett Foundation, 2017, WHY RID 2 ABR IS SAF
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2014, 322 MON U ACC RES CT
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1991, Manufacturing Knowledge: A History of the Hawthorne Experiments
[7]  
Austroads, 2016, AUSTR PUB, VAGTM08-16
[8]  
Beck M., 2016, ROAD RAGE WHY DO BIK
[9]   Single- versus multi-vehicle bicycle road crashes in Victoria, Australia [J].
Boufous, Soufiane ;
de Rome, Liz ;
Senserrick, Teresa ;
Ivers, Rebecca Q. .
INJURY PREVENTION, 2013, 19 (05) :358-362
[10]  
Bromhead N., 2018, 2 ABREAST EXPLAINED