Comparison of different eggshell thickness measurement methods

被引:2
作者
Arslan, Abdulkadir [1 ]
Yamak, Umut Sami [1 ]
机构
[1] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Anim Sci, Samsun, Turkey
关键词
Eggshell thickness; egg weight; incubation; specific gravity; ultrasound; SHELL THICKNESS; EGG; HATCHABILITY;
D O I
10.3906/vet-2004-127
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
This study was conducted to examine how various methods affect the results of eggshell thickness measurements. Direct and indirect measurements were performed on 700 table eggs which were daily collected from the same flock. The shell thickness of the eggs was calculated according to a logarithm which uses egg weight. Eggs with a specific gravity of higher than 0.80 g/cm(3) were classified as thick-shelled, whereas the others were categorized as thin-shelled. After determining the shell thickness of the eggs by an ultrasound gauge, all of the eggs were broken, the shells were separated, and the shell thickness of each egg was measured with two micrometers (digital and manual). Values measured by the manual micrometer were considered as actual thicknesses. Lowest correlation was determined between the logarithm method and the others (P > 0.05). However, there was a significant correlation between ultrasound and micrometer measurements (P < 0.05). According to the results of the current study, ultrasound measurement may be accepted as a suitable method for determining the eggshell thickness without breaking the egg.
引用
收藏
页码:1150 / 1153
页数:4
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, KAFKAS U VET FAK DER
[2]   AVIAN EGG - WATER-VAPOR CONDUCTANCE, SHELL THICKNESS, AND FUNCTIONAL PORE AREA [J].
AR, A ;
PAGANELLI, CV ;
REEVES, RB ;
GREENE, DG ;
RAHN, H .
CONDOR, 1974, 76 (02) :153-158
[3]  
Bennett C. D., 1992, Journal of Applied Poultry Research, V1, P61, DOI 10.1093/japr/1.1.61
[4]   HENS EGG - RAPID METHOD FOR ROUTINE ESTIMATION OF FLOCK MEAN SHELL THICKNESS [J].
CARTER, TC .
BRITISH POULTRY SCIENCE, 1975, 16 (02) :131-143
[5]  
Ergun OF, 2017, VET WORLD, V10, P1114, DOI 10.14202/vetworld.2017.1114-1117
[6]  
Hamilton R. M. G., 1976, 7322598 ENG RES SERV
[7]   COMPARISON OF 2 METHODS OF MEASURING EGG-SHELL QUALITY [J].
LEESON, S ;
SUMMERS, JD .
POULTRY SCIENCE, 1976, 55 (06) :2472-2474
[8]   Allometric equations for predicting body mass of dinosaurs [J].
Packard, G. C. ;
Boardman, T. J. ;
Birchard, G. F. .
JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 2009, 279 (01) :102-110
[9]  
Peebles E. D., 2004, MISSISSIPPI AGR FORE, V1139, P16
[10]   EVALUATION OF VARIOUS METHODS OF MEASURING EGG SHELL QUALITY [J].
SNAPIR, N ;
PEREK, M .
ANNALES DE ZOOTECHNIE, 1969, 18 (04) :399-&