Hydrogen production system combined with a catalytic reactor and a plasma membrane reactor from ammonia

被引:56
|
作者
Hayakawa, Yukio [1 ]
Miura, Tomonori [2 ]
Shizuya, Kota [1 ]
Wakazono, Shintaro [1 ]
Tokunaga, Kenya [1 ]
Kambara, Shinji [1 ]
机构
[1] Gifu Univ, Dept Chem & Biomol Sci, Gifu, Japan
[2] Sawafuji Elect Co Ltd, Gunma, Japan
关键词
Hydrogen production; Ammonia; Plasma; Hydrogen separation membrane; Catalyst; ENERGY-SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.12.141
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Ammonia is a 1promising raw material for hydrogen production because it may solve several problems related to hydrogen transport and storage. Hydrogen can be effectively produced from ammonia via catalytic thermal decomposition; however, the resulting residual ammonia negatively influences the fuel cells. Therefore, a high-purity hydrogen production system comprising a catalytic decomposition reactor and a plasma membrane reactor (PMR) has been developed in this work. Most of the ammonia is converted to hydrogen and nitrogen by the catalytic reactor. After the product gas containing unreacted ammonia is introduced to the PMR, unreacted ammonia is decomposed and hydrogen is separated in the PMR. Based on these processes, hydrogen with a purity of 99.99% is obtained at the output of the PMR. Optimal operation conditions maximizing the hydrogen production flow rate were investigated. The gap length of the PMR and the gas differential pressure and applied voltage of the plasma influence the flow rate. A pure hydrogen flow rate of similar to 120 L/h was achieved using the current operating conditions. The maximum energy efficiency of the developed hydrogen production system is 28.5%. (C) 2019 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:9987 / 9993
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Hydrogen production from waste activated sludge by using separation membrane acid fermentation reactor and photosynthetic reactor
    Jeong, Tae-Young
    Cha, Gi-Cheol
    Yoo, Ik-Keun
    Kim, Dong-Jin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2007, 32 (05) : 525 - 530
  • [32] Plasma-Catalytic Ceramic Membrane Reactor for Volatile Organic Compound Control
    Jo, Jin-Oh
    Lee, Sang Baek
    Jang, Dong Lyong
    Mok, Young Sun
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PLASMA SCIENCE, 2013, 41 (10) : 3021 - 3029
  • [33] On the feasibility of a plasma-chemical reactor for hydrogen production
    E. T. Protasevich
    Technical Physics, 2003, 48 : 795 - 796
  • [34] A novel configuration for hydrogen production from coupling of methanol and benzene synthesis in a hydrogen-permselective membrane reactor
    Khademi, M. H.
    Jahanmiri, A.
    Rahimpour, M. R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2009, 34 (12) : 5091 - 5107
  • [35] On the feasibility of a plasma-chemical reactor for hydrogen production
    Protasevich, ET
    TECHNICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 48 (06) : 795 - 796
  • [36] A protonic ceramic membrane reactor for the production of hydrogen from coal steam gasification
    Kyriakou, V.
    Garagounis, I.
    Vourros, A.
    Marnellos, G. E.
    Stoukides, M.
    JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2018, 553 : 163 - 170
  • [37] Ultra-pure hydrogen production from reformate mixtures using a palladium membrane reactor system
    Abdollahi, Mitra
    Yu, Jiang
    Liu, Paul K. T.
    Ciora, Richard
    Sahimi, Muhammad
    Tsotsis, Theodore T.
    JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2012, 390 : 32 - 42
  • [38] Analysis of the Combined Ammonia Production and Cyclohexane Dehydrogenation by a Novel Bifunctional Reactor
    Ghani, Roozbeh
    Boostani, Fatemeh
    Iranshahi, Davood
    ENERGY & FUELS, 2019, 33 (07) : 6717 - 6726
  • [39] Pure Hydrogen and Propylene Coproduction in Catalytic Membrane Reactor-Assisted Propane Dehydrogenation
    Saidi, Majid
    Safaripour, Maryam
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 43 (07) : 1402 - 1415
  • [40] Hydrogen Production from Methane Decomposition in Cold Plasma Reactor with Rotating Electrodes
    Moshrefi, Mohammad Mahdi
    Rashidi, Fariborz
    PLASMA CHEMISTRY AND PLASMA PROCESSING, 2018, 38 (03) : 503 - 515