What drives political commitment for nutrition? A review and framework synthesis to inform the United Nations Decade of Action on Nutrition

被引:134
作者
Baker, Phillip [1 ]
Hawkes, Corinna [2 ]
Wingrove, Kate [1 ]
Demaio, Alessandro Rhyl [3 ]
Parkhurst, Justin [4 ]
Thow, Anne Marie [5 ]
Walls, Helen [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Deakin Univ, Inst Phys Act & Nutr, Sch Exercise & Nutr Sci, Geelong, Vic, Australia
[2] City Univ London, Ctr Food Policy, London, England
[3] WHO, Dept Nutr Hlth & Dev, Geneva, Switzerland
[4] London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, Dept Hlth Policy, London, England
[5] Univ Sydney, Menzies Ctr Hlth Policy, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[6] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Fac Publ Hlth & Policy, London, England
[7] Leverhulme Ctr Integrated Res Agr & Hlth, London, England
关键词
SUGAR-SWEETENED BEVERAGES; OBESITY PREVENTION; ENABLING ENVIRONMENT; STAKEHOLDER PERSPECTIVES; SENSITIVE AGRICULTURE; POLICY FORMULATION; CHILDHOOD OBESITY; LABELING POLICY; SOUTH-ASIA; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000485
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction Generating country-level political commitment will be critical to driving forward action throughout the United Nations Decade of Action on Nutrition (2016-2025). In this review of the empirical nutrition policy literature, we ask: what factors generate, sustain and constrain political commitment for nutrition, how and under what circumstances? Our aim is to inform strategic 'commitment-building' actions. Method We adopted a framework synthesis method and realist review protocol. An initial framework was derived from relevant theory and then populated with empirical evidence to test and modify it. Five steps were undertaken: initial theoretical framework development; search for relevant empirical literature; study selection and quality appraisal; data extraction, analysis and synthesis and framework modification. Results 75 studies were included. We identified 18 factors that drive commitment, organised into five categories: actors; institutions; political and societal contexts; knowledge, evidence and framing; and, capacities and resources. Irrespective of country-context, effective nutrition actor networks, strong leadership, civil society mobilisation, supportive political administrations, societal change and focusing events, cohesive and resonant framing, and robust data systems and available evidence were commitment drivers. Low-income and middle-income country studies also frequently reported international actors, empowered institutions, vertical coordination and capacities and resources. In upper-middle-income and high-income country studies, private sector interference frequently undermined commitment. Conclusion Political commitment is not something that simply exists or emerges accidentally; it can be created and strengthened over time through strategic action. Successfully generating commitment will likely require a core set of actions with some context-dependent adaptations. Ultimately, it will necessitate strategic actions by cohesive, resourced and strongly led nutrition actor networks that are responsive to the multifactorial, multilevel and dynamic political systems in which they operate and attempt to influence. Accelerating the formation and effectiveness of such networks over the Nutrition Decade should be a core task for all actors involved.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 99 条
[1]  
Acosta A.Mejia., 2012, FIGHTING MATERNAL CH
[2]   The politics of success in the fight against malnutrition in Peru [J].
Acosta, Andres Mejia ;
Haddad, Lawrence .
FOOD POLICY, 2014, 44 :26-35
[3]  
Allender Steven, 2009, Aust New Zealand Health Policy, V6, P20, DOI 10.1186/1743-8462-6-20
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2 INT C NUTR C OUTC
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2008, MAKING NUTR NATL PRI
[6]  
[Anonymous], ANAL NUTR GOVERNANCE
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Fighting maternal and child undernutrition: Analysing the political and institutional determinants of delivering a national multisectoral response in six countries
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2015, The state of food insecurity in the world 2015-meeting the 2015 international hunger targets: taking stock of uneven progress, P1
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Policy Brief, V21, P402, DOI [DOI 10.1111/J.17456584.1983.TB00740.X, 10.1111/j.17456584.1983.tb00740.x]
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Global nutrition policy review: what does it take to scale up nutrition action?