BLENDED LEARNING ENGAGEMENT IN HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS: A DIFFERENTIAL ITEM FUNCTIONING ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS' BACKGROUNDS

被引:0
作者
Adams, Donnie [1 ]
Joo, Mabel Tan Hwee [2 ]
Sumintono, Bambang [1 ]
Pei, Oh Siew [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaya, Fac Educ, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
[2] UCSI Univ, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
来源
MALAYSIAN JOURNAL OF LEARNING & INSTRUCTION | 2020年 / 17卷 / 01期
关键词
Student engagement; blended learning; higher education institution; Rasch model; COURSES;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Purpose - Digital technology has transformed teaching and learning in such a way that it seems imperative lecturers and institutions need to adapt and adopt a blended learning model of instruction across disciplines. However, there is a scarcity of studies to determine the degree of students' engagement on blended or online university courses. The purpose of the study is to investigate students' cognitive engagement, emotional engagement, and behavioural engagement in a blended learning model of instruction as well as specifically assess their engagement based on demographic factors such as age, gender, field of study, ethnicity, and type of institution in leading Malaysian public and private higher education institutions. Methodology - A non-experimental quantitative research design was employed in this study. 462 undergraduate and postgraduate students were sampled using the Blended Learning Readiness Engagement Questionnaire. Subsequently, WINSTEPS Rasch model measurement software was used to determine the reliability and validity of the research instrument. Descriptive statistics and differential item functioning (DIE) were conducted to assess students' engagement in a blended learning model of instruction with the latter analysing specifically on student's demographic factors such as age, gender, field of study, ethnicity, and type of institution. Findings - Findings show high levels of engagement in blended learning activities among students in both public and private higher education institutions based on their cognitive, emotional, and behavioural engagement processes. Findings also indicates differences in students' engagement based on demographic factors such as age, gender, field of study, ethnicity, and type of institution. Significance -The findings of this study will help lecturers reflect on their own teaching practices in this era of technology advancement where a blended learning model of instruction are given increased prioritisation and proliferation. Implications and recommendations for future research in blended learning practices are presented.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 158
页数:26
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Acelajado M.J., 2011, ELECT J MATH TECHNOL, V5, P342
  • [2] Adams D, 2018, MALAYS J LEARN INSTR, V15, P227
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2013, APLIKASI MODEL RASCH
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2010, P REG C KNOWL INT IC
  • [5] Better to be frustrated than bored: The incidence, persistence, and impact of learners' cognitive affective states during interactions with three different computer-based learning environments
    Baker, Ryan S. J. D.
    D'Mello, Sidney K.
    Rodrigo, Ma. Mercedes T.
    Graesser, Arthur C.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER STUDIES, 2010, 68 (04) : 223 - 241
  • [6] A meta-analysis of blended learning and technology use in higher education: from the general to the applied
    Bernard, Robert M.
    Borokhovski, Eugene
    Schmid, Richard F.
    Tamim, Rana M.
    Abrami, Philip C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTING IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2014, 26 (01) : 87 - 122
  • [7] Bond T, 2015, APPLYING RASCH MODEL, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781315814698
  • [8] Boone W.J., 2014, Rasch analysis in the human sciences
  • [9] Utilizing Multifaceted Rasch Measurement Through FACETS to Evaluate Science Education Data Sets Composed of Judges, Respondents, and Rating Scale Items: An Exemplar Utilizing the Elementary Science Teaching Analysis Matrix Instrument
    Boone, William J.
    Townsend, J. Scott
    Staver, John R.
    [J]. SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2016, 100 (02) : 221 - 238
  • [10] Curley A., 2002, CLIN MANAGEMENT, V111, P15