Single-cuff forearm tourniquet in intravenous regional anaesthesia results in less pain and fewer sedation requirements than upper arm tourniquet

被引:19
作者
Chiao, F. B. [1 ]
Chen, J.
Lesser, J. B.
Resta-Flarer, F.
Bennett, H.
机构
[1] St Lukes Roosevelt Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, New York, NY 10019 USA
关键词
Bier block; regional anaesthesia; SURGERY; ANALGESIA; TOLERANCE; BLOCK; CARE; HAND;
D O I
10.1093/bja/aet032
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
A limitation of Biers block or i.v. regional anaesthesia (IVRA) is tourniquet pain. We hypothesized that tourniquet placement on the forearm vs upper arm during IVRA for distal upper extremity surgery may result in less tourniquet pain, lower the need for analgesic interventions, and decrease post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) admission. Patients for distal upper extremity surgery were randomized into upper or forearm single-cuff tourniquet placement. IVRA was either performed with 15 ml of 2 lidocaine and 20 mg ketorolac in the upper group or 8 ml of 2 lidocaine and 10 mg ketorolac in the forearm group. Vital signs and visual analogue scale (VAS) score were recorded. If VAS score was 4, 50 g fentanyl was injected. If the patient had VAS scores 6 with fentanyl, deep sedation with propofol was administered. Twenty-eight subjects were in each group. There were no significant differences in patient characteristics, tourniquet time, or pressure between the groups. Ten patients in the forearm vs 27 in the upper arm group had a VAS score 4. The mean fentanyl use was 30 g in the forearm group vs 104 g in the upper arm group. One patient in the forearm group required propofol vs 22 in the upper arm group. PACU bypass to phase 2 recovery occurred 19 times in the forearm group vs zero times in the upper arm group (P0.0001). Our results indicate that the placement of the tourniquet on the forearm resulted in less discomfort, fewer sedation interventions, and greater likelihood of bypassing the PACU when compared with upper arm tourniquet.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 275
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Eliminating intensive postoperative care in same-day surgery patients using short-acting anesthetics
    Apfelbaum, JL
    Walawander, CA
    Grasela, TH
    Wise, P
    McLeskey, C
    Roizen, MF
    Wetchler, BV
    Korttila, K
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2002, 97 (01) : 66 - 74
  • [2] INTRAVENOUS REGIONAL ANALGESIA WITH A FOREARM TOURNIQUET
    CHAN, CS
    PUN, WK
    CHAN, YM
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1987, 34 (01): : 21 - 25
  • [3] Comparison of forearm and conventional Bier's blocks for manipulation and reduction of distal radius fractures
    Chong, A. K. S.
    Tan, D. M. K.
    Ooi, B. S.
    Mahadevan, M.
    Lim, A. Y. T.
    Lim, B. H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-BRITISH AND EUROPEAN VOLUME, 2007, 32E (01) : 57 - 59
  • [4] MODIFIED FOREARM INTRAVENOUS REGIONAL ANALGESIA FOR HAND SURGERY
    CHOW, SP
    PUN, WK
    LUK, KDK
    SO, YC
    IP, FK
    CHAN, KC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1989, 14A (05): : 913 - 914
  • [5] COLBERN EC, 1970, ANESTH ANAL CURR RES, V49, P935
  • [6] Quantitative comparison of leakage under the tourniquet in forearm versus conventional intravenous regional anesthesia
    Coleman, MM
    Peng, PW
    Regan, JM
    Chan, VWS
    Hendler, AL
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1999, 89 (06) : 1482 - 1486
  • [7] Efficacy of forearm versus upper arm tourniquet for local anaesthetic surgery of the hand
    Edwards, SA
    Harper, GD
    Giddins, GEB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-BRITISH AND EUROPEAN VOLUME, 2000, 25B (06) : 573 - 574
  • [8] Hadzic, 2011, A HADZICS PERIPHERAL
  • [9] UPPER EXTREMITY TOURNIQUET TOLERANCE
    HUTCHINSON, DT
    MCCLINTON, MA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1993, 18A (02): : 206 - 210
  • [10] Joshi G P, 1999, Curr Opin Anaesthesiol, V12, P643, DOI 10.1097/00001503-199912000-00002