Male Caregivers of Patients With Breast and Gynecologic Cancer Experiences From Caring for Their Spouses and Partners

被引:81
作者
Lopez, Violeta [1 ]
Copp, Gina [2 ]
Molassiotis, Alexander [3 ]
机构
[1] Australian Natl Univ, Res Ctr Nursing & Midwifery Practice, Sch Med, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[2] Middlesex Univ, Sch Hlth & Social Sci, London N17 8HR, England
[3] Univ Manchester, Sch Nursing Midwifery & Social Work, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
关键词
Breast cancer; Caregiving; Caring; Gender; Gynecologic cancer; Longitudinal; Male; Protection; Qualitative design; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; MULTIPLE-MYELOMA; CARE; DISTRESS; QUALITY; SUPPORT; FAMILY; ADJUSTMENT; DEPRESSION; SYMPTOMS;
D O I
10.1097/NCC.0b013e318231daf0
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: There is considerable evidence demonstrating the negative effects of caregiving particularly in the areas of psychological well-being and quality of life of family caregivers of patients with cancer. However, there is little work on male caregivers' subjective experience of caring for family members with cancer, and little is known on how caregivers experience the caring over time. Objective: The objective of the study was to explore male spouses'/partners' experience of caring for their wives/partners with breast and gynecologic cancer over a 1-year period. Method: An exploratory longitudinal qualitative descriptive design using face-to-face interviews of 15 spouses/partners was used in this study. Content analysis of the transcribed data was conducted to extract significant categories and themes. Results: Varying degrees of interrelated cognitive, physical, and psychological impact were experienced by caregivers that extended to 12 months. Gender-specific attitudes prevented male caregivers from supporting their own self. Male caregivers dealt with problems that arose in the caregiving congruent with their masculinity, such as minimizing disruptions, focusing on tasks, and keeping their own stress to themselves. Conclusion: Male caregivers as a separate group with their own needs have not received much attention in the cancer literature, and their concerns and challenges may differ from those of female caregivers. Implications for Practice: Male caregivers' concerns and challenges must be taken into consideration when planning appropriate interventions to support them in their caregiving role.
引用
收藏
页码:402 / 410
页数:9
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
Baucom DH, 2008, PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, V18, P267
[2]   Breast Cancer in a Wife How Husbands Cope and How Well It Works [J].
Bigatti, Silvia M. ;
Brown, Linda F. ;
Steiner, Jennifer L. ;
Miller, Kathy D. .
CANCER NURSING, 2011, 34 (03) :193-201
[3]   Taking 'women's work' 'like a man': Husbands' experiences of care work [J].
Calasanti, Toni ;
King, Neal .
GERONTOLOGIST, 2007, 47 (04) :516-527
[4]   The mental health of informal caregivers in Ontario: An epidemiological survey [J].
Cochrane, JJ ;
Goering, PN ;
Rogers, JM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1997, 87 (12) :2002-2007
[5]   Relationship vulnerabilities during breast cancer: patient and partner perspectives [J].
Fergus, Karen D. ;
Gray, Ross E. .
PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2009, 18 (12) :1311-1322
[6]  
Glajchen Myra, 2004, J Support Oncol, V2, P145
[7]  
Grbich C., 2009, Qualitative data analysis: An introduction
[8]   Primary caregivers of cancer patients in the palliative phase:: A path analysis of variables influencing their burden [J].
Grov, Ellen Karine ;
Fossa, Sophie D. ;
Sorebo, Oystein ;
Dahl, Alv A. .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2006, 63 (09) :2429-2439
[9]   Family caregiver burden: results of a longitudinal study of breast cancer patients and their principal caregivers [J].
Grunfeld, E ;
Coyle, D ;
Whelan, T ;
Clinch, J ;
Reyno, L ;
Earle, CC ;
Willan, A ;
Viola, R ;
Coristine, M ;
Janz, T ;
Glossop, R .
CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2004, 170 (12) :1795-1801
[10]   Marital satisfaction in patients with cancer: Does support from intimate partners benefit those who need it the most? [J].
Hagedoorn, M ;
Kuijer, RG ;
Buunk, BP ;
DeJong, GM ;
Wobbes, T ;
Sanderman, R .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 19 (03) :274-282