Robust Portfolio Control with Stochastic Factor Dynamics

被引:42
作者
Glasserman, Paul [1 ]
Xu, Xingbo [2 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Columbia Business Sch, New York, NY 10027 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Ind Engn & Operat Res Dept, New York, NY 10027 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
VALUE-AT-RISK; RELATIVE ENTROPY; OPTIMIZATION; MANAGEMENT; UTILITY;
D O I
10.1287/opre.2013.1180
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Portfolio selection is vulnerable to the error-amplifying effects of combining optimization with statistical estimation and model error. For dynamic portfolio control, sources of model error include the evolution of market factors and the influence of these factors on asset returns. We develop portfolio control rules that are robust to this type of uncertainty, applying a stochastic notion of robustness to uncertainty in model dynamics. In this stochastic formulation, robustness reflects uncertainty about the probability law generating market data, and not just uncertainty about model parameters. We analyze both finite-and infinite-horizon problems in a model in which returns are driven by factors that evolve stochastically. The model incorporates transaction costs and leads to simple and tractable optimal robust controls for multiple assets. We illustrate the performance of the controls on historical data. As one would expect, in-sample tests show no evidence of improved performance through robustness-evaluating performance on the same data used to estimate a model leaves no room to capture model uncertainty. However, robustness does improve performance in out-of-sample tests in which the model is estimated on a rolling window of data and then applied over a subsequent time period. By acknowledging uncertainty in the estimated model, the robust rules lead to less aggressive trading and are less sensitive to sharp moves in underlying prices.
引用
收藏
页码:874 / 893
页数:20
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   A QUARTET OF SEMIGROUPS FOR MODEL SPECIFICATION, ROBUSTNESS, PRICES OF RISK, AND MODEL DETECTION [J].
Anderson, Evan W. ;
Hansen, Lars Peter ;
Sargent, Thomas J. .
JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION, 2003, 1 (01) :68-123
[2]   Value and Momentum Everywhere [J].
Asness, Clifford S. ;
Moskowitz, Tobias J. ;
Pedersen, Lasse Heje .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2013, 68 (03) :929-985
[3]   Dynamic Mean-Variance Asset Allocation [J].
Basak, Suleyman ;
Chabakauri, Georgy .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2010, 23 (08) :2970-3016
[4]  
Ben T.A., 2000, Applied Optimization, P303
[5]   Robust multiperiod portfolio management in the presence of transaction costs [J].
Bertsimas, Dimitris ;
Pachamanova, Dessislava .
COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2008, 35 (01) :3-17
[6]   Risk sensitive portfolio management with Cox-Ingersoll-Ross interest rates: The HJB equation [J].
Bielecki, TR ;
Pliska, SR ;
Sheu, SJ .
SIAM JOURNAL ON CONTROL AND OPTIMIZATION, 2005, 44 (05) :1811-1843
[7]   Risk-sensitive dynamic asset management [J].
Bielecki, TR ;
Pliska, SR .
APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND OPTIMIZATION, 1999, 39 (03) :337-360
[8]  
Campbell J. Y., 2002, STRATEGIC ASSET ALLO
[9]   Ambiguity, risk, and asset returns in continuous time [J].
Chen, ZJ ;
Epstein, L .
ECONOMETRICA, 2002, 70 (04) :1403-1443
[10]   Distributionally Robust Optimization Under Moment Uncertainty with Application to Data-Driven Problems [J].
Delage, Erick ;
Ye, Yinyu .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2010, 58 (03) :595-612