A Survey of Distributed Consensus Protocols for Blockchain Networks

被引:513
作者
Xiao, Yang [1 ]
Zhang, Ning [2 ]
Lou, Wenjing [3 ]
Hou, Y. Thomas [1 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Polytech Inst & State Univ, Bradley Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
[2] Washington Univ, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
[3] Virginia Polytech Inst & State Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
来源
IEEE COMMUNICATIONS SURVEYS AND TUTORIALS | 2020年 / 22卷 / 02期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Blockchain; distributed consensus; fault tolerance; protocol design; TIME; AGREEMENT; BROADCAST;
D O I
10.1109/COMST.2020.2969706
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Since the inception of Bitcoin, cryptocurrencies and the underlying blockchain technology have attracted an increasing interest from both academia and industry. Among various core components, consensus protocol is the defining technology behind the security and performance of blockchain. From incremental modifications of Nakamoto consensus protocol to innovative alternative consensus mechanisms, many consensus protocols have been proposed to improve the performance of the blockchain network itself or to accommodate other specific application needs. In this survey, we present a comprehensive review and analysis on the state-of-the-art blockchain consensus protocols. To facilitate the discussion of our analysis, we first introduce the key definitions and relevant results in the classic theory of fault tolerance which help to lay the foundation for further discussion. We identify five core components of a blockchain consensus protocol, namely, block proposal, block validation, information propagation, block finalization, and incentive mechanism. A wide spectrum of blockchain consensus protocols are then carefully reviewed accompanied by algorithmic abstractions and vulnerability analyses. The surveyed consensus protocols are analyzed using the five-component framework and compared with respect to different performance metrics. These analyses and comparisons provide us new insights in the fundamental differences of various proposals in terms of their suitable application scenarios, key assumptions, expected fault tolerance, scalability, drawbacks and trade-offs. We believe this survey will provide blockchain developers and researchers a comprehensive view on the state-of-the-art consensus protocols and facilitate the process of designing future protocols.
引用
收藏
页码:1432 / 1465
页数:34
相关论文
共 134 条
[1]  
Abd-El-Malek M., 2005, SIGOPS OPER SYST REV, V39, P59, DOI [DOI 10.1145/1095809.1095817, DOI 10.1145/1095810.1095817]
[2]   DEFINING LIVENESS [J].
ALPERN, B ;
SCHNEIDER, FB .
INFORMATION PROCESSING LETTERS, 1985, 21 (04) :181-185
[3]  
Amoussou-Guenou Y., 2018, IACR CRYPTOLOGY EPRI, V2018, P574
[4]   Hyperledger Fabric: A Distributed Operating System for Permissioned Blockchains [J].
Androulaki, Elli ;
Barger, Artem ;
Bortnikov, Vita ;
Cachin, Christian ;
Christidis, Konstantinos ;
De Caro, Angelo ;
Enyeart, David ;
Ferris, Christopher ;
Laventman, Gennady ;
Manevich, Yacov ;
Muralidharan, Srinivasan ;
Murthy, Chet ;
Binh Nguyen ;
Sethi, Manish ;
Singh, Gari ;
Smith, Keith ;
Sorniotti, Alessandro ;
Stathakopoulou, Chrysoula ;
Vukolic, Marko ;
Cocco, Sharon Weed ;
Yellick, Jason .
EUROSYS '18: PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRTEENTH EUROSYS CONFERENCE, 2018,
[5]  
[Anonymous], P 31 INT S DISTR COM
[6]  
[Anonymous], COSM SDK DOC VAL OV
[7]  
[Anonymous], SHARD INTR R D COMP
[8]  
[Anonymous], EMPH31ST INT S DISTR
[9]  
[Anonymous], LIRIAS2089352 UENIX
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2019, VISA FACT SHEET