Results of Application of External Fixation with Different Types of Fixators

被引:3
作者
Grubor, Predrag [1 ]
Grubor, Milan [2 ]
机构
[1] Dept Orthopaed & Trauma Surg, Banja Luka, Bosnia & Herceg
[2] Fac Med, Banja Luka, Bosnia & Herceg
关键词
external fixator; biomechanics; range of stability; FRACTURES;
D O I
10.2298/SARH1206332G
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Extra-focal or external fixation is the method of fracture fixation through the healthy part of the bone using pins or wires. Objective The aim was to determine which external splints (Ortofix, Mitkovic, Charnley and Ilizarov) had the best biomechanical properties in primary stabilization of spiral, transverse and commutative bone fractures. Methods To determine the investigation methodology of biomechanical characteristics of the external fixator we used mathematical and computer simulator (software), juvidur physical model and clinical examination. Results Values of advancing fragments in millimetres obtained by the study of mathematical and computer simulator (software): Charnley - 0.080 mm, Mitkovic M 20 - 0.785 mm, Ilizarov - 2.245 mm and Ortofix - 1.400 mm. In testing the juvidur model the following values were obtained: the external fixator Mitkovic M20 - 1.380 mm, Ortofix - 1.470 mm, Ilizarov - 2.410 mm, and Charnley - 2.510 mm. Clinical research of biomechanical characteristics of the effect of vertical force yielded the following results: Mitkovic M20 - 0.89 mm, Ortofix - 0.14 mm, Charnley - 0.80 mm and Ilizarov - 1.23 mm. Conclusion When determining the total number of the stability test splints under the effect of vertical force (compression) and force effect in antero-posterior, later-lateral plane of cross, spiral and comminuted long bone fractures, the best unified biomechanical stability was shown by the following external fixators: firstly, Mitkovic M20 (0.93mm), secondly, Charnley fixator (1.14 mm), thirdly, Ortofix (1.22 mm), and fourthly, Ilizarov (1.60 mm).
引用
收藏
页码:332 / 338
页数:7
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   In vivo assessment of regenerate axial stiffness in distraction osteogenesis [J].
Aarnes, GT ;
Steen, H ;
Ludvigsen, P ;
Waanders, NA ;
Huiskes, R ;
Goldstein, SA .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2005, 23 (02) :494-498
[2]   THE TREATMENT OF FRACTURES WITH A DYNAMIC AXIAL FIXATOR [J].
DEBASTIANI, G ;
ALDEGHERI, R ;
BRIVIO, LR .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1984, 66 (04) :538-545
[3]   EXTERNAL FIXATION OF THE LEG USING UNILATERAL BIPLANAR FRAMES [J].
FERNANDEZ, AA .
ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 1985, 104 (03) :182-186
[4]   THE INFLUENCE OF INDUCED MICROMOVEMENT UPON THE HEALING OF EXPERIMENTAL TIBIAL FRACTURES [J].
GOODSHIP, AE ;
KENWRIGHT, J .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1985, 67 (04) :650-655
[5]  
Grubor P., 2001, THESIS U NISU NIS
[6]  
Grubor P., 1996, MANUAL EXTERNAL FIXA
[7]  
Grubor P., 2000, TREATMENT BONE DEFEC
[8]  
Nikolic D., 2002, ACTA FM NAISSENSIS, V19, P191
[9]  
Piscevic S., 1976, ACTA HIRURGICA YUGOS, V2, P19
[10]  
Popovic D., 1991, RATNA RANA